The GS, Coco, Righty & Mr Blofeld thread
#1
Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:33 AM
You're welcome.
#2
Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:38 AM
In all fairness, you seem to have overlooked the epic Gravity-elizabeth feud.
#3
Posted 12 August 2011 - 11:40 AM
#4
Posted 12 August 2011 - 02:16 PM
...but I must say Righty comes out swinging...
Edited by Chief of SIS, 12 August 2011 - 02:18 PM.
#5
Posted 12 August 2011 - 02:34 PM
But seriously folks, where do you really think you're going with this?
#6
Posted 12 August 2011 - 03:05 PM
5:00, Gravity. Don't miss your part this time. PLEASE. I want to see your performance as Renfield. But I know you'll be nowhere as amazing as Mr. Frye.
I guess this fight is over then because you're the retard.Taken from the Craig Turned Bond Down thread:
But, to paraphrase a wise old man I once knew: 'Who's the more retarded? The retard or the retard that argues with him?'
You're just retarded.
Using that word to describe others gives them permission to use it to describe you, FYI.
Oh, and by the way, I would never accuse anyone of those things unless there were evidence. In your case...boy, do I have evidence of your retardedness. I have so much evidence against you--hell, EVERYONE on this board does--that it oozes like the blood spilled after the St. Valentine's Day Massacre.
#7
Posted 12 August 2011 - 04:03 PM
#8
Posted 12 August 2011 - 06:39 PM
So, as everyone should have noticed by now, the Team has by in large walked away from CBn. This site is on its own, so it's up to all the forum contributors to decide what kind of place this is going to be. Good luck.
I think in the end that's always down to the contributors, regardless how much of a team is or isn't present. By and large most members are quite capable of acting responsible and show a necessary minimum of manners and style over considerable spaces of time. I wouldn't stay if that was not the case.
That said there is doubtlessly room for improvement and I would welcome for example a more lively main page and a return of missing members, both of the team and the forums. But as far as I know others have already offered their help, so I don't know how I could help the situation beyond staying as civil as possible wherever the need for civility arises.
#9
Posted 12 August 2011 - 06:48 PM
So, as everyone should have noticed by now, the Team has by in large walked away from CBn. This site is on its own, so it's up to all the forum contributors to decide what kind of place this is going to be. Good luck.
This greatly saddens me. I was hoping this would be shut down. I'm disappointed with everyone across the board, Mods and flamers alike. So, unfortunately, I will attempt to make a case for sanity here at CBn. I haven't been posting on this forum for a long time. Probably actively for a year. But I registered back in '08. It was the one forum out there that appeared to have sensible Bond fans that just truly loved the character. You want proof of that look at all the fun fan-fiction worked on or amount of time spent discussing Bond's more obscure novels. And since I've joined, it seems like the conversation is less about Bond and more about the culture around CBn.
And here is where I really grind my teeth. I'm really looking at you here Gravity, coco, Righty, or whoever finds it necessary to start an internet feud with a person they have never personally met and in all reality based on their common interest in Bond would most likely enjoy, right now there is probably some Bond fan reading this post and looking through this topic or possibly the 'Craig Turned Down Bond' topic, and thinking to themselves 'What is this crap?' Who on the outside wants to be a part of a community that isn't even centered around the topic it is supposed to be discussing? We're missing the insane opportunity to bring new life to this board. We already kicked out the older ones. It's mutiny on the bounty. You don't like someone else's view. Fine. Great actually. It's called discussion. If you can't do it with respect and an open mind and not realize that someone is capable of having a different view from you even if it is presented forcefully and radically, if you can't do these things, on behalf of the tired, fed up, Bond loving enthusiasts on this board, I request of you to shape up or get the out of my community.
Jeez, I miss the Shark.
Edited by Chief of SIS, 12 August 2011 - 07:04 PM.
#10
Posted 12 August 2011 - 06:57 PM
Excuse me, I haven't started feuds with any of them. The fact is that the arguments are derailing so many threads and I'm tired of it - so many people have complained but it doesn't stop, it goes on and on and on. Given that, fine, let them carry on, but put it all in one place, away from the other discussions. I'm a neat freak, I believe everything should have its place. I don't care if they all hate each other (although frankly they all seem to be enjoying it a bit too much for me to believe that), I'm just bored of seeing it all over the forum, all the time.I'm really looking at you here Gravity, Santa, coco, Righty, or whoever finds it necessary to start an internet feud with a person they have never personally met
#11
Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:01 PM
Having said that, I hereby promise to be a bigger man and not allow my personal issues with the party in question to seep over to my activity here on CB.n.
#12
Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:03 PM
Excuse me, I haven't started feuds with any of them. The fact is that the arguments are derailing so many threads and I'm tired of it - so many people have complained but it doesn't stop, it goes on and on and on. Given that, fine, let them carry on, but put it all in one place, away from the other discussions. I'm a neat freak, I believe everything should have its place. I don't care if they all hate each other (although frankly they all seem to be enjoying it a bit too much for me to believe that), I'm just bored of seeing it all over the forum, all the time.
Clumping your name was in the wrong. I know you're trying hard. I think I just grabbed off the topic heading since you started the topic. I apologize and remove your name to attempt to make a stronger more focused argument.
And Coco, thank you, welcome to the high road.
Edited by Chief of SIS, 12 August 2011 - 07:04 PM.
#13
Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:04 PM
#14
Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:07 PM
Thanks.Clumping your name was in the wrong. I know you're trying hard. I think I just grabbed off the topic heading since you started the topic. I apologize and remove your name to attempt to make a stronger more focused argument.
And Coco, thank you, welcome to the high road.
And Santa is right; she doesn't deserve to belong on this list. However, elizabeth does--I see more fighting between her and Gravity on these forums than between any other two members that I can remember.
Not trying to vilify her; it's just an observation I've made.
#15
Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:17 PM
Thank you, sweet pea.And Santa is right; she doesn't deserve to belong on this list. However, elizabeth does--I see more fighting between her and Gravity on these forums than between any other two members that I can remember.
The names listed weren't meant to be exclusive, I just picked on the ones I'd noticed first/most. Doesn't mean they're the only offenders - we've all had a dispute with someone on here at some point but what's been going on lately is excessive. Along with Chief of SIS, I thank you for the tone of your response.
#16
Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:26 PM
Anyway, before you all tell me to off I just thought I'd share.
By the way, did I mention your feuds are interesting reads?
#17
Posted 12 August 2011 - 08:43 PM
I never once "started an argument" with any of the parties involved here. I was unfairly attacked a few weeks ago by Mr. Blofeld in my 4 year old Stephen Colbert thread. Check it out; my post history doesn't lie.
I'm no longer a mod here but let's make this the last post in this discrace of a thread. Okay?
We all win.
CBn loses. It's dead. 2000-2011.
#18
Posted 12 August 2011 - 09:59 PM
Sorry all. Let's start anew.
#19
Posted 12 August 2011 - 10:32 PM
#20
Posted 13 August 2011 - 05:40 AM
You raise a good point, but that's pretty much what the PM/Communique system is for.Bless you, Santa, I love this idea. If somebody wants to take offense at something someone else has written, they can simply say, "See you at the thread," and both of them can come here. If a member finds a discussion becoming rancorous and personal, he/she can tell those involved, "Take it to the thread," and the antagonists can come here, carrying on ad infinitum.
#21
Posted 14 August 2011 - 12:30 AM
What "crap"? You're the one who cried at the craptastical ending of The End of Time Part 2; you've no right to determine what is and isn't crap.
The series isn't over yet, Harkster... so don't start whining about whatever mysteries haven't been solved; there's six more episodes to come.
If you really want more RTD, there's always "Torchwood"... oh, wait, you've already professed your love for that. Figures.
-- A Pissed-Off Fan of Who
A little harsh, don't you think? I love how it's coming to a point where no one can really have an opinion around this guy anymore.
#22
Posted 14 August 2011 - 12:49 AM
We could get along, but... you know what? Never mind. Guess we can agree to disagree. I think the only way to settle this is to wait until Moffat leaves, no?
#23
Posted 14 August 2011 - 12:52 AM
Anyway, this thread is getting a little heated again. I think it's time for a little entertainment.
#24
Posted 14 August 2011 - 01:03 AM
#25
Posted 14 August 2011 - 01:19 AM
#26
Posted 14 August 2011 - 01:32 AM
#27
Posted 14 August 2011 - 01:39 AM
Who's strangling the cat?It was a private rage, actually. Just because I have a different opinion to you, doesn't give you the right to send me a message saying that I'm wrong. So what I cried at the ending to End of Time. David Tennant is my favourite Doctor and I grew up with him? Big deal.
Anyway, this thread is getting a little heated again. I think it's time for a little entertainment.
#28
Posted 14 August 2011 - 03:44 AM
Who's strangling the cat?... Just because I have a different opinion to you, doesn't give you the right to ....
The correct pronunciation, I believe, is stranglin' (only one "g").
#29
Posted 14 August 2011 - 05:21 AM
It's a PRIVATE message, not a PUBLIC message, no? Defeats the purpose... and I still think Moffat-Who is demonstrably better than RTD-Who.
Yes, but nor is its purpose for ABUSIVE messages. Mr Harkin perfectly justified in exposing it.
#30
Posted 14 August 2011 - 06:30 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWk8SzooWBo
5:00, Gravity. Don't miss your part this time. PLEASE. I want to see your performance as Renfield. But I know you'll be nowhere as amazing as Mr. Frye.I guess this fight is over then because you're the retard.
Taken from the Craig Turned Bond Down thread:But, to paraphrase a wise old man I once knew: 'Who's the more retarded? The retard or the retard that argues with him?'
You're just retarded.
Using that word to describe others gives them permission to use it to describe you, FYI.
Oh, and by the way, I would never accuse anyone of those things unless there were evidence. In your case...boy, do I have evidence of your retardedness. I have so much evidence against you--hell, EVERYONE on this board does--that it oozes like the blood spilled after the St. Valentine's Day Massacre.
Maybe very off topic, but I actually bothered to see Dracula (1931), the video from this post. I saw the whole movie, and it was fantastic. There's something about the lack of music that lends itself to the creepiness and atmosphere of the film. Bela Lugosi is traditionally regarded as the best Dracula actor for a reason. Thanks for posting the video!