
Javier Bardem offered starring role
#151
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:22 PM
#152
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:31 PM

Whatever one thinks of the last two films, EON has significantly raised the Bond bar with Craig and the reboot, hiring Mendes to direct and having him court a talent like Bardem is a great case in point. Hopefully the script (in whatever state it's in, I imagine Logan will be doing some polishing once more casting is in place) seals the deal.
#153
Posted 04 February 2011 - 10:31 AM
#154
Posted 04 February 2011 - 01:07 PM
#155
Posted 04 February 2011 - 06:12 PM
#156
Posted 04 February 2011 - 06:39 PM
And Harry Potter (Runs)
I do wonder when he will accept his destiny and star in the gritty Rising Damp reboot
#157
Posted 04 February 2011 - 11:03 PM
And the Ralph Fiennes of THE AVENGERS, CLASH OF THE TITANS and RED DRAGON is also the same Ralph Fiennes of SCHINDLER'S LIST, STRANGE DAYS, THE ENGLISH PATIENT, IN BRUGES and THE READER. When he's on form, he's terrific.
#158
Posted 04 February 2011 - 11:11 PM
Hey, you take that back! Those two movies were directed by arguably two of the best directors in the Bond series!Yeah, well, Olivier was in INCHON and WILD GEESE II.


#159
Posted 05 February 2011 - 01:03 AM
I seem to recall reading somewhere that Craig did TOMB RADIER because he is (or at least was) a huge fan of the games and wanted to be in the film regardless of how it turned out.All actors make their share of poor choices - they're only human. Daniel Craig did TOMB RAIDER.
#160
Posted 05 February 2011 - 03:17 AM
#161
Posted 05 February 2011 - 03:40 AM
Lol that movie was great as a comedy movie(because it was so bad), but way before Craig was bond he was actually the only reason why i truly like it. His character was the only good written one in the film.I seem to recall reading somewhere that Craig did TOMB RADIER because he is (or at least was) a huge fan of the games and wanted to be in the film regardless of how it turned out.
All actors make their share of poor choices - they're only human. Daniel Craig did TOMB RAIDER.
#162
Posted 05 February 2011 - 04:15 AM
Lol that movie was great as a comedy movie(because it was so bad), but way before Craig was bond he was actually the only reason why i truly like it. His character was the only good written one in the film.
I seem to recall reading somewhere that Craig did TOMB RADIER because he is (or at least was) a huge fan of the games and wanted to be in the film regardless of how it turned out.
All actors make their share of poor choices - they're only human. Daniel Craig did TOMB RAIDER.
Seeing Angelina Jolie as Lara Croft was worth seeing, even if the plot/film was silly.
#163
Posted 05 February 2011 - 04:56 AM
#164
Posted 05 February 2011 - 09:48 AM
Yeah, well, Olivier was in INCHON and WILD GEESE II. All actors make their share of poor choices - they're only human. Daniel Craig did TOMB RAIDER.
And the Ralph Fiennes of THE AVENGERS, CLASH OF THE TITANS and RED DRAGON is also the same Ralph Fiennes of SCHINDLER'S LIST, STRANGE DAYS, THE ENGLISH PATIENT, IN BRUGES and THE READER. When he's on form, he's terrific.
Well, duh!
Sorry to be rude, but I do know that and didn't say otherwise.
Though I did find Strange Days a letdown and The English Patient isn't a favourite
Quiz Show is underrated these days. When the infamous Best Picture nominees of 94 are discussed it's generally ignored, but for me that's the one that was right up there with Pulp Fiction
#165
Posted 08 February 2011 - 10:48 PM
#166
Posted 08 February 2011 - 10:58 PM
Apparently, the cameras are going to start rolling on this film a lot earlier than we've been expecting. Which would make sense, considering all these casting rumours.
Yeah I imagine filming will begin either in November or December. No doubt they want to get rolling. Exciting stuff.
#167
Posted 09 February 2011 - 07:16 AM
Apparently, the cameras are going to start rolling on this film a lot earlier than we've been expecting. Which would make sense, considering all these casting rumours.
Yeah I imagine filming will begin either in November or December. No doubt they want to get rolling. Exciting stuff.
Well - they said "fall" in the reports, so the timeline seemed always this year.
#168
Posted 09 February 2011 - 08:20 AM
Apparently, the cameras are going to start rolling on this film a lot earlier than we've been expecting. Which would make sense, considering all these casting rumours.
Yeah I imagine filming will begin either in November or December. No doubt they want to get rolling. Exciting stuff.
Well - they said "fall" in the reports, so the timeline seemed always this year.
Probably complete bollocks but May 2011 is being mentioned in some quarters......
#169
Posted 09 February 2011 - 08:56 AM
We'll know when the source of all such knowledge speaks.
Apparently, the cameras are going to start rolling on this film a lot earlier than we've been expecting. Which would make sense, considering all these casting rumours.
Yeah I imagine filming will begin either in November or December. No doubt they want to get rolling. Exciting stuff.
Well - they said "fall" in the reports, so the timeline seemed always this year.
Probably complete bollocks but May 2011 is being mentioned in some quarters......
Zorin? Can you help us out at all?
#170
Posted 09 February 2011 - 08:56 AM
Apparently, the cameras are going to start rolling on this film a lot earlier than we've been expecting. Which would make sense, considering all these casting rumours.
Yeah I imagine filming will begin either in November or December. No doubt they want to get rolling. Exciting stuff.
Well - they said "fall" in the reports, so the timeline seemed always this year.
Probably complete bollocks but May 2011 is being mentioned in some quarters......
Where does this come from?
#171
Posted 09 February 2011 - 04:09 PM
Apparently, the cameras are going to start rolling on this film a lot earlier than we've been expecting. Which would make sense, considering all these casting rumours.
Yeah I imagine filming will begin either in November or December. No doubt they want to get rolling. Exciting stuff.
Well - they said "fall" in the reports, so the timeline seemed always this year.
Probably complete bollocks but May 2011 is being mentioned in some quarters......
Where does this come from?
A friend heard it from a supposedly reliable source; like I said it could well be nonsense but it does fit with the "sooner than expected" rumours that others have mentioned.
#172
Posted 09 February 2011 - 06:01 PM
A friend heard it from a supposedly reliable source; like I said it could well be nonsense but it does fit with the "sooner than expected" rumours that others have mentioned.
Thanks. I’d be very surprised, but I suppose it’s not totally out of the question. Casting does seem to be taking place extremely early by Bond standards.
Then there was all that talk from Forster last time, about there being too short a period for post production… he said something about The Dark Knight having the best part of a year and him having only a few weeks, something like that.
Having said the above, your friend’s source could mean that that’s when things get moving at Pinewood, perhaps. I know that set construction for DAD was well underway in September for a production start in January.
The Press release announcing that Bond 23 was back on, did say “late 2011” for the start of production. I took this to mean October, November-ish. This would give them a few extra months for postproduction, which seems sensible.
#173
Posted 09 February 2011 - 08:31 PM
Apparently, the cameras are going to start rolling on this film a lot earlier than we've been expecting. Which would make sense, considering all these casting rumours.
Yeah I imagine filming will begin either in November or December. No doubt they want to get rolling. Exciting stuff.
Well - they said "fall" in the reports, so the timeline seemed always this year.
Probably complete bollocks but May 2011 is being mentioned in some quarters......
VERY likely its bullocks, as Tattoo shooting goes well into May.
#174
Posted 09 February 2011 - 08:49 PM
#175
Posted 09 February 2011 - 09:11 PM
#176
Posted 09 February 2011 - 09:15 PM
People can do two things at once - especially actors whose filming commitments don't overlap when neighbouring projects realise the needs of the other.VERY likely its bullocks, as Tattoo shooting goes well into May.
I would imagine things are bubbling along nicely in Bond Production Land.
#177
Posted 09 February 2011 - 11:47 PM
Second unit could get started in May, then Mendes and Craig join the fun in June. Mendes doing that play later this spring may explain him attempting to lock in Jardem and Fiennes now while he's got comparably more time in the day.
If any filming starts in May (which I doubt) this is probably the case, second unit. Remember some footage of the Palio di Siena was filmed months before regular production on QoS.
#178
Posted 09 February 2011 - 11:52 PM
Second unit could get started in May, then Mendes and Craig join the fun in June. Mendes doing that play later this spring may explain him attempting to lock in Jardem and Fiennes now while he's got comparably more time in the day.
If any filming starts in May (which I doubt) this is probably the case, second unit. Remember some footage of the Palio di Siena was filmed months before regular production on QoS.
Yup, I remember that. Really happy this is becoming a reality. Man I hope the script is good.
#179
Posted 10 February 2011 - 09:10 AM
People can do two things at once - especially actors whose filming commitments don't overlap when neighbouring projects realise the needs of the other.
VERY likely its bullocks, as Tattoo shooting goes well into May.
I would imagine things are bubbling along nicely in Bond Production Land.
Good to hear you talk positively about the developments for Bond, but I say not for this, as DC would have to go into training before Bond and that is not done in a week AND he has shot back to back for a year now and needs a break. I don't see them startiong to shoot before fall. He will have to ptomote C&A during July, too and do the same for DH in Septemer. Not possible, if he is in the middle of shooting 23 IMO.
#180
Posted 10 February 2011 - 10:25 AM
Personally, I don´t have to see him do Bond as the musclepack again. As any leading actor these days he will be ripped nevertheless.
So, training is not that much of a factor (except for stunt scenes, of course). But DRAGON TATTOO will probably wrap Craig´s scenes early enough, and the PR for C&A will be scheduled not to coincide with BOND 23.
If the film indeed has to go in front of the cameras this year. What´s wrong with the "old" schedule of shooting in the early months of the year 12 for a release in November?