Maybe...I do have an idea in mind for a PTS that I'll submit provided no one else snatches it up before Round 2.Perhaps the PTS can involve Bond having to prove himself to MI6, by passing a field test of some sort.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0841/e08417d8e07db79e0e01cff2a8f125cc59534534" alt=":)"
Posted 18 December 2010 - 08:45 PM
Maybe...I do have an idea in mind for a PTS that I'll submit provided no one else snatches it up before Round 2.Perhaps the PTS can involve Bond having to prove himself to MI6, by passing a field test of some sort.
Posted 18 December 2010 - 08:46 PM
EON has discovered young, Afro-British artists before, so there's precedent, for this alternate reality...
Posted 18 December 2010 - 11:22 PM
Posted 18 December 2010 - 11:54 PM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 12:34 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 12:35 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 12:38 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 12:41 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 12:53 AM
Given the two 'villain' characters are essentially glorified henchmen - with that casting and that character, looks like we may have a true female villain.
I specifically created Granger to address the problem posed by the end of LICENCE TO KILL - namely, that Bond ignored orders and went off on his own. It's never really specified how a licence to kill actually works, but I've always figured it would work in such a way that Bond (or any other Double-Oh) can only use it when on assignment. Bond went so far off the reservation in LICENCE TO KILL that was he did equated to murder. That's something that absolutely needs to be addressed in this episode. M isn't going to simply welcome him back with open arms - Bond has to prove that he can be trusted to stay the course. I figure M trying to deal with Bond's actions in LICENCE TO KILL could make for a nice little subplot. It wouldn't so much be the can-I-trust-you-or-not? deal that we've seen of late, but moreso that there would be fallout from the Sanchez killings that MI6 need to deal with. As such, I have Granger in mind as a low-level field mission for Bond, the foundation for which M's trust will be built back up. Of course, I've always felt that the best stories are the ones that start with something small that invariably lead to something big. Look at LETHAL WEAPON, and the way a prostitute's suicide is the first in a series of events that lead to Riggs and Murtaugh uncovering a conspiracy of ex-CIA operatives smuggling heroin out of Vietnam. I figure the sequence of events could be something similar here: Bond gets a supposedly low-level assignment - investigate the suspicious death of somebody connected to the Ministry of Defence (or some such), only to find that the killer is part of a much wider conspiracy.
Edited by SamuelKevlar, 19 December 2010 - 01:03 AM.
Posted 19 December 2010 - 12:56 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 12:56 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 01:04 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 01:08 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 01:12 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 01:16 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 01:20 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 01:27 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 01:49 AM
If Chun Qiao does turn out to be the 'main villain' of the piece (I've not actually read the Millenium Trilogy, Samuel, though I own them, so can't really compare) as I interpreted her, then my new submission can be the secondary girl - if not, Chun Qiao can be the villain with Miss Lauder as the 'main girl'.
Posted 19 December 2010 - 01:56 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:02 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:05 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:09 AM
Okay - I understand what you're gunning for now, Samuel
It's beginning to look like we may need to bump coco's character up to main villain then - assuming he doesn't mind us doing so. It does offer some hiccups re: he'd need to be overdubbed - by Max von Sydow possibly - as he was in the 'previous years' Ghostbusters 2.
I wouldn't be opposed to swapping Ephraim Lewis for David Bowie, though in the late eighties/early nineties, he was going through a quiet period and not putting out much music at all (he released an album in 87, then didn't put one out until 93) so he might be better kept for a potential future UB Moore film.
Do we really have to go to Rotarua for the finale? After all, we did the Great Barrier Reef as the finale of UB-Moore; it just feels a bit repetitive. And while I can see the villain dying by sliding into the superheated mud, the series already did that in DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER.
Edited by SamuelKevlar, 19 December 2010 - 02:18 AM.
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:14 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:30 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:31 AM
Well, I was going to suggest Isthmus City as the PTS location (if it's still open when the third round comes about).If Samuel agrees to that. CT - and from the hypothesis the PTS could feature Bond undergoing some sort of assault/training course - then perhaps NZ could be the first location in the main bulk of the movie (after the titles) and M could assign Bond as temporary 'Head of Station' in New Zealand? As opposed to the Shrublands facility - or, perhaps, somehow mixing the two together.
But, ultimately, it is Samuel's choice.
That's what they do. Alan Rickman is Gideon Granger; when he takes LSD and becomes Dark Granger, the part is played by Jean Reno. I deliberately case two actors, because I wanted to externalise Dark Granger. Gideon believes that Bond and Dark Granger have so much in common that if he kills Bond, Dark Granger will die and he will be freed. I could see the entire plot being a plot by Gideon Granger to lure Bond out of hiding, though that would mean the prison/array sequence would become the final scene.I've got to say, I'd rather have Alan Rickman (or indeed Jean Reno) as the main villain (maybe one playing both sides of Granger, Jekyll/Hyde-style, and the other as the big baddie), but as we say in Holland, we must row with the oars we have.
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:35 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:41 AM
And yes, I have been to Rotarua. I think it could work as either a Shrublands-style health centre or as the final location Bond and the girl visit once everything is over ... but I'm just hesitant to once again have the climax being in Australia/New Zealand. It's like the way he had a second Double-Oh Agent in UB24-27. It just got repetitive.
Remember, though, we are fifteen years after 'Everything or Nothing' would have taken place - so two visits to Australasia in fifteen years ain't bad.
Edited by SamuelKevlar, 19 December 2010 - 02:43 AM.
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:50 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 02:54 AM
Posted 19 December 2010 - 03:00 AM