Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Most Disappointing Bond Film


129 replies to this topic

#121 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 11 June 2010 - 10:56 PM

So I clicked on this thread hoping to read more replies to what people consider to be a disappointing Bond film and lo and behold...I came smack into another QoS debate thread.

Way to ruin it for the rest of us guys.

#122 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 12 June 2010 - 12:44 PM

But perhaps that's only because QUANTUM OF SOLACE was the most disappointing Bond film for many people here (myself included).

#123 Trident

Trident

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2658 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 12 June 2010 - 01:58 PM

It's also the most recent Bond film. People are far more likely to remember that disappointment than, say, the one of Moonraker.

#124 darthbond

darthbond

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 839 posts
  • Location:Pocatello ID

Posted 12 June 2010 - 03:28 PM

I agree with Trident.

darthbond

#125 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 14 June 2010 - 03:29 AM

But perhaps that's only because QUANTUM OF SOLACE was the most disappointing Bond film for many people here (myself included).


True, I'm not debating that people can't be disappointed by it. But then there are several threads (and a whole forum) where they can voice their disappointment on the film. It shouldn't take up other threads. In other forums.

#126 john.steed

john.steed

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 271 posts
  • Location:Silver Spring, MD

Posted 14 June 2010 - 09:37 AM

But perhaps that's only because QUANTUM OF SOLACE was the most disappointing Bond film for many people here (myself included).


True, I'm not debating that people can't be disappointed by it. But then there are several threads (and a whole forum) where they can voice their disappointment on the film. It shouldn't take up other threads. In other forums.

You are right, there are many threads with heated discussions about Quantum of Solace. However, as the title of this tread is "Most Disappointing Bond Film", people are listing QoS, and many other films are well. Perhaps you should suggest that both supporters and detractors of QoS mose the further discussion elsewhere.

#127 elizabeth

elizabeth

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2285 posts
  • Location:SDSU - Go Aztecs!!!

Posted 14 June 2010 - 04:02 PM

But perhaps that's only because QUANTUM OF SOLACE was the most disappointing Bond film for many people here (myself included).

Me too. The action is terrific, but it was too quick.

#128 DR76

DR76

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1673 posts

Posted 25 June 2010 - 07:29 PM

Tomorrow Never Dies . . . with Diamonds Are Forever a close second.

#129 tdalton

tdalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 11680 posts

Posted 26 June 2010 - 05:04 AM

Tomorrow Never Dies . . . with Diamonds Are Forever a close second.


Although I've got Diamonds are Forever at the top of my list, I agree that Tomorrow Never Dies is right up there near the top as well. If there was ever a "checklist" Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies would be it. It's a shame, too, since the premise of the film holds so much potential.

#130 Quincy

Quincy

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 229 posts

Posted 29 June 2010 - 04:32 AM

Well, with this thread I suppose it doesn't mean for us to simply pick the worst entry so I'll go with DAF.

After the ending in OHMSS, DAF could have been a great follow-up.

I guess I'll also throw in that it was dissapointing that Lazenby didn't reprise the role. Connery was starting to age noticeably here. Lazenby was wonderful in OHMSS and probably would have handled a revenge plot a whole lot better than Connery and comnpany did.

Edited by Quincy, 29 June 2010 - 04:33 AM.