Cowboys and Aliens - 2011
#211
Posted 12 June 2011 - 02:24 AM
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49999
It looks like a lot of fun. For one thing, it doesn't take itself nearly as seriously as other alien invasion films like BATTLE LOS ANGELES, SKYLINE and even SUPER 8. It knows just how ridiculous an alien invasion sounds and plays it as a strength rather than trying to ground it in reality.
#212
Posted 12 June 2011 - 01:24 PM
#213
Posted 12 June 2011 - 01:57 PM
#214
Posted 12 June 2011 - 05:12 PM
#215
Posted 12 June 2011 - 09:02 PM
#216
Posted 12 June 2011 - 10:20 PM
#217
Posted 12 June 2011 - 10:32 PM
I hope it is, because this summer is a particularly lousy one, and I'm going to need something a little better than X-MEN: FIRST CLASS to satisfy my cravings for popcorn entertainment. But I'm not holding my breath.It's got to be good, hasn't it?
#218
Posted 12 June 2011 - 10:42 PM
#219
Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:03 PM
#220
Posted 13 June 2011 - 12:17 AM
I hope it is, because this summer is a particularly lousy one, and I'm going to need something a little better than X-MEN: FIRST CLASS to satisfy my cravings for popcorn entertainment. But I'm not holding my breath.It's got to be good, hasn't it?
You're loss. You're missing out on SPY KIDS 4: ARMAGEDDON and SKANK ROBBERS.
#221
Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:32 AM
#222
Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:33 AM
I really hope this is good. It's got to be good, hasn't it?
Of course, but there have been a lot of movies that looked great but let people down in the past. I don't think it's going to happen this time.
#223
Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:33 AM
Interesting, Harms. I thought this summer looks to be a marked improvement over last year's which outside of INCEPTION I found utterly dismal. Already saw a couple great movies in X-MEN: FIRST CLASS and SUPER 8 and highly anticipating GREEN LANTERN, CAPTAIN AMERICA, and COWBOYS & ALIENS.I hope it is, because this summer is a particularly lousy one, and I'm going to need something a little better than X-MEN: FIRST CLASS to satisfy my cravings for popcorn entertainment. But I'm not holding my breath.It's got to be good, hasn't it?
I think COWBOYS will turn out to be the surprise hit of the summer. Watching the trailer, the feeling I get is one of confidence. For a change the filmmakers are content with holding their best cards close to the chest. They show next to nothing. This could also be the best role Harrison Ford has had in almost twenty years.
#224
Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:48 AM
I hope it is, because this summer is a particularly lousy one, and I'm going to need something a little better than X-MEN: FIRST CLASS to satisfy my cravings for popcorn entertainment. But I'm not holding my breath.It's got to be good, hasn't it?
You're loss. You're missing out on SPY KIDS 4: ARMAGEDDON and SKANK ROBBERS.
Worthy of a reply because I searched SKANK ROBBERS after I laughed at that reply. Watched the trailer. Now, that is high-brow entertainment.
#225
Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:50 AM
Edited by iBond, 13 June 2011 - 02:50 AM.
#226
Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:59 AM
I remember when people were talking about the first meeting between Kirk and Picard and how cool it was going to be...It was a big let down for most people.
That whole film was a disappointment.
#227
Posted 13 June 2011 - 03:45 AM
I'd more say I'm surprised by how straight it seems given the concept, which is a bold move, not the one I would have asked for personally perhaps, but it seems to be working...there's a lot to like in these trailers, but I just can't escape the impression this is going to be another fairly generic blockbuster with too much screentime eaten up by a suspense-free battle scene where people shoot at CGI.
Well most summer blockbusters now have one CGI thing fighting another CGI thing, so at least here you'll get actual humans pretending to fight things that aren't there
You're loss. You're missing out on SPY KIDS 4: ARMAGEDDON and SKANK ROBBERS.
Actually Spy Kids 4's subtitle is the semi-intriguing "All the time in the world", so somebody involved with it at least knows their stuff
#228
Posted 13 June 2011 - 04:09 AM
I'd more say I'm surprised by how straight it seems given the concept, which is a bold move, not the one I would have asked for personally perhaps, but it seems to be working...there's a lot to like in these trailers, but I just can't escape the impression this is going to be another fairly generic blockbuster with too much screentime eaten up by a suspense-free battle scene where people shoot at CGI.
Well most summer blockbusters now have one CGI thing fighting another CGI thing, so at least here you'll get actual humans pretending to fight things that aren't thereYou're loss. You're missing out on SPY KIDS 4: ARMAGEDDON and SKANK ROBBERS.
Actually Spy Kids 4's subtitle is the semi-intriguing "All the time in the world", so somebody involved with it at least knows their stuff
I wonder if Eon gave them some trouble.
#230
Posted 15 June 2011 - 12:45 PM
#231
Posted 15 June 2011 - 01:09 PM
You found TOY STORY 3 dismal? I wasn't that taken with it, myself, but it was more solid than anything I've seen this summer so far, and I suspect, by the time summer's out, it will still beat out what we've got. But my real favorite of last year's summer far was SCOTT PILGRIM. Nothing this summer seems to serve up such personality.Interesting, Harms. I thought this summer looks to be a marked improvement over last year's which outside of INCEPTION I found utterly dismal.
#232
Posted 15 June 2011 - 01:44 PM
#233
Posted 15 June 2011 - 01:51 PM
Despite being saddled with two miscast leads, I thought SCOTT PILGRIM had plenty of energy, with one solid joke hitting right after another. Most importantly, it had a very distinct personality, something I don't detect about this summer's crop of blockbusters. Since Hollywood does its best to homogenize the entertainment it offers, any Hollywood entertainment with a unique point of view is a small victory. Of course, any film as idiosyncratic as SCOTT PILGRIM is not going to work for everyone.Must say; I thought Scott Pilgrim dragged a lot.
I'll be pleased if either turns out well, but I don't see much reason to have faith.I've got high hopes for this and Captain America, though.
#234
Posted 15 June 2011 - 03:08 PM
Despite being saddled with two miscast leads, I thought SCOTT PILGRIM had plenty of energy, with one solid joke hitting right after another. Most importantly, it had a very distinct personality, something I don't detect about this summer's crop of blockbusters. Since Hollywood does its best to homogenize the entertainment it offers, any Hollywood entertainment with a unique point of view is a small victory. Of course, any film as idiosyncratic as SCOTT PILGRIM is not going to work for everyone.
Must say; I thought Scott Pilgrim dragged a lot.
It had an identity, yeah, but it ran out of jokes and few of them really worked. Some were crackers, but most weren't. And it started with the relationship before the one where he has to fight the 7 evil exes beginning. It takes about 45 mins into the film to meet the first evil ex: it felt like it went on forever.
I don't think something being different is good enough, to be honest; I'd prefer a very good solid homogenised one to an overlong, muddled, occasionally funny comedy with a different voice.
I'll be pleased if either turns out well, but I don't see much reason to have faith.I've got high hopes for this and Captain America, though.
I dunno; both look decent fun and are from the directors of Iron Man and The Rocketeer, doing not dissimilar things from those films which were both very capably handled. I think that's reason enough to be optimistic.
I'd be less optimistic if they were by Edgar Wright, to be honest; I'm not sure he's made more than one good film and has struggled to be cinematic.
Have you seen Attack the Block? Might be your sort of thing. I didn't find it completely successful, but it's solid enough.
#235
Posted 15 June 2011 - 03:45 PM
I'd be less optimistic if they were by Edgar Wright, to be honest; I'm not sure he's made more than one good film and has struggled to be cinematic.
I'd be far more willing to watch those two flicks, if they were directed by anyone with the humour, balls, and insight of Edgar Wright. He might've been able to sort of subversively critique and parody the Hollywood blockbuster, while simultaneously making one - rather than just working as another mindless a pawn in their game. I'd say Favreau, Abrams, and Johnston qualify as the later.
#237
Posted 15 June 2011 - 05:22 PM
Yeah; is that by Struzan? I though he'd retired...Ooh; Struzan-y; nice.
#238
Posted 15 June 2011 - 06:45 PM
I confess I didn't see TOY STORY 3 last summer. Since I know my niece and nephews will want to watch whatever the latest Pixar movie is when I visit for the holidays, I tend to hold off going to see such movies until then. The exception to that rule being anything Brad Bird does I will rush to the theater to see. I agree with you on SCOTT PILGRIM. But two movies doesn't make a summer for me. This summer has much more that I'm interested in.You found TOY STORY 3 dismal? I wasn't that taken with it, myself, but it was more solid than anything I've seen this summer so far, and I suspect, by the time summer's out, it will still beat out what we've got. But my real favorite of last year's summer far was SCOTT PILGRIM. Nothing this summer seems to serve up such personality.Interesting, Harms. I thought this summer looks to be a marked improvement over last year's which outside of INCEPTION I found utterly dismal.
In particular I'm interested in COWBOYS & ALIENS as the filmmakers seem to be going for a movie that feels like a real western before scary aliens appear. Daniel Craig looks to be playing a suitably tough character.
#239
Posted 15 June 2011 - 07:47 PM
Those 45 minutes are probably my favorite section of the film. But, again, I think SCOTT PILGRIM is very funny stuff indeed, so we're clearly on different pages with this one. I've not seen ATTACK THE BLOCK. Didn't even know what it was, to be honest. Sounds like it could be okay.It takes about 45 mins into the film to meet the first evil ex: it felt like it went on forever.
IRON MAN is mediocre at best. I don't get excited at the promise of seeing another film on that level. And if Johnston can match the playfulness of THE ROCKETEER, I'll be pleased, but I'm skeptical he's got it in him (or whether the Marvel movie machine will let him do it; their build-up to THE AVENGERS has been a liability for the films to date).I dunno; both look decent fun and are from the directors of Iron Man and The Rocketeer, doing not dissimilar things from those films which were both very capably handled. I think that's reason enough to be optimistic.
Yep.I'd be far more willing to watch those two flicks, if they were directed by anyone with the humour, balls, and insight of Edgar Wright. He might've been able to sort of subversively critique and parody the Hollywood blockbuster, while simultaneously making one - rather than just working as another mindless a pawn in their game. I'd say Favreau, Abrams, and Johnston qualify as the later.
I'll take quality over quantity. I'll take one genuinely great film over ten or twenty good pictures.But two movies doesn't make a summer for me.
If it seemed to be doing either the "Western" or "alien movie" part of the equation particularly well, I'd be happy. Admittedly, we haven't seen that much of the flick, but what we have seen isn't very interesting.In particular I'm interested in COWBOYS & ALIENS as the filmmakers seem to be going for a movie that feels like a real western before scary aliens appear.
#240
Posted 15 June 2011 - 09:28 PM
I'd be less optimistic if they were by Edgar Wright, to be honest; I'm not sure he's made more than one good film and has struggled to be cinematic.
I'd be far more willing to watch those two flicks, if they were directed by anyone with the humour, balls, and insight of Edgar Wright. He might've been able to sort of subversively critique and parody the Hollywood blockbuster, while simultaneously making one - rather than just working as another mindless a pawn in their game. I'd say Favreau, Abrams, and Johnston qualify as the later.
He can, but for me he's not fully reached the status of a good director yet; you have to be good to do that. Scott Pilgrim was the most cinematic he's been, which is good; but he needed to do that after Hot Fuzz, which was very much a TV movie; not a cinema one. I like him, but I think he's promised more than he's delivered so far; although of course Shaun is a classic. Scott Pilgrim needed to be great and... it wasn't.
Favreau, Abrams, and Johnston do indeed have less of a voice but they've all made very satisfying big summer movies and shown they all know what they're doing in this kind of sandpit.
Those 45 minutes are probably my favorite section of the film. But, again, I think SCOTT PILGRIM is very funny stuff indeed, so we're clearly on different pages with this one. I've not seen ATTACK THE BLOCK. Didn't even know what it was, to be honest. Sounds like it could be okay.
I thought you'd be all over that one; it's a tougher Shaun of the Dead, really. Doesn't quite take off enough for me, but it's a very decent first effort.
IRON MAN is mediocre at best.
Hmm. No; it's not. I agree that it's a not-hugely outstanding superhero effort lifted by the leading man, but at best it's very entertaining and fun, whether that's down to Downey (and the rest of the amazing cast) or not.
And if Johnston can match the playfulness of THE ROCKETEER, I'll be pleased, but I'm skeptical he's got it in him (or whether the Marvel movie machine will let him do it; their build-up to THE AVENGERS has been a liability for the films to date).
That's a bit negative; I don't see why they wouldn't. They've even said they're trying to go for the Raiders vibe again, which I think is good news. And it looks great so far; I love a period adventure film.