40 replies to this topic

[JimmyBond]

This thread is a curious case. On one hand some of the members were a little more "agressive" in their responses to you Harkins. But on the other hand, seeing innuendo where none exists and believing it to be on purpose for a film made back in the 80s does seem a tad on the silly side.

I'll admit when I watch LTK I sometimes snicker at the "finger me" line, knowing what it could mean. But I realize that wasnt what it was intended to mean.

[Nicolas Suszczyk]

"Mharkin, you borracho, go to bed!"

So good I've first saw Licence to Kill subtitled in Spanish... these misunderstandings wouldn't have happened.

Don't blame Matt... you know these kind of attitudes can be considered as a sexual harrasement , and sometimes he'll have to make goood on his innuendos.

[Righty007]

This thread is a curious case. On one hand some of the members were a little more "agressive" in their responses to you Harkins.

I've been here for 6 years and I've seen a lot of absurd but this thread takes the cake, hence my "aggressive" responses.

[DamnCoffee]

Oh yes, because this thread is the WORST thread ever created in the history of CBn. Stop over exaggerating...


Anyone else think Jaws should return for Bond 20? You know, just to help Bond defeat the baddy. -_-


I've had it with this.

[Dr. Tynan]

Oh yes, because this thread is the WORST thread ever created in the history of CBn. Stop over exaggerating...

True.

[JimmyBond]

This thread is a curious case. On one hand some of the members were a little more "agressive" in their responses to you Harkins.

I've been here for 6 years and I've seen a lot of absurd but this thread takes the cake, hence my "aggressive" responses.

And I've been here for seven. This thread is nowhere near as bad as the poster who claimed there was a conspiracy to replace Brosnan with Jackman on Die Another Day...after they started filming! She would cite video's of behind the scenes footage of Brosnan looking "mad" as exacmples that Brosnan was already fired and he was just filming footage to hide the fact that Jackman was taking over the role and would be announced at a press conference.

Now that was an absurd thread.

[DaveBond21]

Now that was an absurd thread.

Absurd? That sounds a bit like turd, he-he.....

[Mr. Blofeld]

Could somebody reign Chris in, please? I get that Mharkin might annoy him, but there's no need to employ vitriol on these forums.

[Tybre]

This thread is a curious case. On one hand some of the members were a little more "agressive" in their responses to you Harkins.

I've been here for 6 years and I've seen a lot of absurd but this thread takes the cake, hence my "aggressive" responses.

And I've been here for seven. This thread is nowhere near as bad as the poster who claimed there was a conspiracy to replace Brosnan with Jackman on Die Another Day...after they started filming! She would cite video's of behind the scenes footage of Brosnan looking "mad" as exacmples that Brosnan was already fired and he was just filming footage to hide the fact that Jackman was taking over the role and would be announced at a press conference.

Now that was an absurd thread.

Absurd? It sounds positively delicious! Wouldn't happen to have been destroyed, would it? I imagine it'll make a brilliant evening read.

[coco1997]

Could somebody reign Chris in, please? I get that Mharkin might annoy him, but there's no need to employ vitriol on these forums.

Matt, Righty's comments were directed at Mharkin and not yourself, so why are you asking for someone to 'reign him in'? He's not done anything in this thread to attack you at all.

It seems to me that Righty has a right to be annoyed at the absurdity of the content of the thread, and he was merely expressing that.

Edited by coco1997, 23 September 2009 - 03:01 AM.

[Qwerty]

OK then, it seems this thread has run its course...

Closed.