9) Crash
What the?
I'd probably list that under my least favourites.
Edited by The Shark, 12 August 2009 - 12:34 PM.
Posted 12 August 2009 - 12:34 PM
9) Crash
Edited by The Shark, 12 August 2009 - 12:34 PM.
Posted 12 August 2009 - 01:57 PM
Edited by The Ghost Who Walks, 12 August 2009 - 02:00 PM.
Posted 12 August 2009 - 03:29 PM
But I think that’s the topic of the thread. Your Top 10, not The Best 10. Dunno. To me, that means your ‘favorites’. (There’s that word again.) ie. “Which 10 films of this millennium would you keep if you could only keep 10?”I mean, yer BOURNE ULTIMATUMs, yer CASINO ROYALEs, yer DARK KNIGHTs, yer ROCKY BALBOAS.... love 'em to bits as I do, I'd never include them in the ranks of true greatness.
My memory of it is not a fond one. I remember almost nothing about it, and that was the case about 24 hours after seeing the film. What I do remember is a very peculiar (I’m being kind with my choice of words here) tangent which takes the story to the Galapagos islands.Why so shocked?
Posted 12 August 2009 - 04:25 PM
But I think that’s the topic of the thread. Your Top 10, not The Best 10. Dunno. To me, that means your ‘favorites’.I mean, yer BOURNE ULTIMATUMs, yer CASINO ROYALEs, yer DARK KNIGHTs, yer ROCKY BALBOAS.... love 'em to bits as I do, I'd never include them in the ranks of true greatness.
“Which 10 films of this millennium would you keep if you could only keep 10?”
Posted 12 August 2009 - 04:40 PM
Posted 12 August 2009 - 04:58 PM
Posted 12 August 2009 - 05:01 PM
Posted 12 August 2009 - 05:29 PM
MASTER AND COMMANDER is the most intelligent and exquisitely constructed cinematic entertainment to come out of the last decade, and was deeply unappreciated during its original release. That's probably because it's something of a subdued film, and subdued films don't tend to make blockbusters. Watching it, I don't get the energy rush I get from some of the decade's other epics. But MASTER AND COMMANDER is still excellent, entirely achieving the task it sets out for itself, and then some.My memory of it is not a fond one. I remember almost nothing about it, and that was the case about 24 hours after seeing the film. What I do remember is a very peculiar (I’m being kind with my choice of words here) tangent which takes the story to the Galapagos islands.
I do recall that it creates a good atmosphere, particularly under the ship’s deck. But its story I thought it was totally unmemorable. And, again, the Galapagos sequence felt horribly tacked on. (An image of Bond and Natalya on the beach comes to mind.)
BUT. I was a different kind of movie-watcher back then, that’s for sure. So who knows…
Posted 12 August 2009 - 05:55 PM
Posted 12 August 2009 - 05:58 PM
Well, then. I guess I'll have to watch it again, this time hopefully with wiser eyes and mind.Yes, MASTER AND COMMANDER is a true classic
Posted 12 August 2009 - 06:24 PM
Posted 12 August 2009 - 06:34 PM
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:04 PM
No love for In Bruges, anyone? It's got three cast members from Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire in it, and they each deliver performances leagues beyond what they offered in Goblet of Fire (I was especially impressed with Fiennes' performance).
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:43 PM
It was; I caught the trailer for it before There Will Be Blood a few years back.I don't think anybody can possibly give their best performances in Harry Potter films.No love for In Bruges, anyone? It's got three cast members from Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire in it, and they each deliver performances leagues beyond what they offered in Goblet of Fire (I was especially impressed with Fiennes' performance).
Loved In Bruges, and was surprised by how dark it was (it was marketed as a typical action comedy, as I seem to recall).
Posted 12 August 2009 - 08:09 PM
But I think that’s the topic of the thread. Your Top 10, not The Best 10. Dunno. To me, that means your ‘favorites’.I mean, yer BOURNE ULTIMATUMs, yer CASINO ROYALEs, yer DARK KNIGHTs, yer ROCKY BALBOAS.... love 'em to bits as I do, I'd never include them in the ranks of true greatness.
Perhaps, but you could interpret it either way. Given that Harmsway didn't pick the likes of CASINO ROYALE and THE DARK KNIGHT, I interpreted his list as a "best" list rather than a "favourites" list and decided to follow suit.“Which 10 films of this millennium would you keep if you could only keep 10?”
Well, if that's the question then probably (in alphabetical order):
BORAT: CULTURAL LEARNINGS OF AMERICA FOR MAKE BENEFIT GLORIOUS NATION OF KAZAKHSTAN
THE BOURNE IDENTITY
THE BOURNE SUPREMACY
THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM
BRUNO
CASINO ROYALE
THE DARK KNIGHT
RAMBO
ROCKY BALBOA
ROLLERBALL
Those are the flicks of this century I've probably returned to the most.
Posted 12 August 2009 - 11:19 PM
MASTER AND COMMANDER is the most intelligent and exquisitely constructed cinematic entertainment to come out of the last decade, and was deeply unappreciated during its original release. That's probably because it's something of a subdued film, and subdued films don't tend to make blockbusters. Watching it, I don't get the energy rush I get from some of the decade's other epics. But MASTER AND COMMANDER is still excellent, entirely achieving the task it sets out for itself, and then some.My memory of it is not a fond one. I remember almost nothing about it, and that was the case about 24 hours after seeing the film. What I do remember is a very peculiar (I’m being kind with my choice of words here) tangent which takes the story to the Galapagos islands.
I do recall that it creates a good atmosphere, particularly under the ship’s deck. But its story I thought it was totally unmemorable. And, again, the Galapagos sequence felt horribly tacked on. (An image of Bond and Natalya on the beach comes to mind.)
BUT. I was a different kind of movie-watcher back then, that’s for sure. So who knows…
You have to understand that MASTER AND COMMANDER is not a plot-driven tale. It's not at all about whether the ship actually succeeds at its given mission or not, or the naval battles. It's a character-driven tale, and is about the friendship that exists in the midst of all that is going on. It's the care with which it handles its characters that makes it so wonderful, and that's why the Galapagos "tangent" makes all the sense in the world. In fact, it's probably the best sequence in the film, both for the beauty it offers, and how it reveals the characters and their relationships to one another.
Not that MASTER AND COMMANDER isn't epic. It very much is, and when it goes for naval action, it does it oh-so-right. But as Roger Ebert said, MASTER AND COMMANDER "achieves epic without losing sight of the human." Yes, MASTER AND COMMANDER is a true classic, whether people recognize that or not, and the kind of film that seems all the more appealing as our blockbusters seem to be getting increasingly louder and dumber.
Posted 13 August 2009 - 11:04 AM
Yes, MASTER AND COMMANDER is a true classic
...certainly better than Pirates Of The Carribean, though.
Posted 13 August 2009 - 12:28 PM
Posted 13 August 2009 - 12:28 PM
Posted 13 August 2009 - 12:59 PM
I think a great part of appreciating MASTER AND COMMANDER is attention--and appetite--for detail. One of the things that truly impresses in MASTER AND COMMANDER is the extent to which it manages to deftly weave in historical detail after historical detail, while never distracting from the source. In this respect, MASTER AND COMMANDER is an incredibly intricate film, and it adds a realism and a weight to the happenings that few other films manage.It's a really good film, but I wouldn't go that far! I've seen it twice and I wasn't that impressed!Yes, MASTER AND COMMANDER is a true classic
Posted 13 August 2009 - 01:25 PM
Posted 13 August 2009 - 01:32 PM
LAY3R CAKE!
I love Layer Cake. I love Daniel Craig, Michael Gambon and the hot, sleazy Sienna Miller in it! I love the wild and wierd character names in the film. I love that shot of DC in his ninja-style mask as he contemplates his imminent assassination of that nasty old prick in the man's own back garden!
For me, that moment could have been James Bond as a pre 00 on the brink of engaging in his first of two kills, this the 'cleaner' one coming first.
I'd vote this movie the non-Bond movie for 007 fans for this decade [the other being The Dreamers] given its historic relevence to the series, specifically the casting of one of the better James Bond actors.
So, I will include it in my list of 9 above to make an even 10!
Posted 13 August 2009 - 01:39 PM
Posted 13 August 2009 - 03:54 PM
...except that The Dreamers is a quite bizarre film; I watched it on IFC a few months back, and could not understand why everyone was acting as though they suffered from severe psychosis. The ending was a letdown, too.I share your view, in a way. Craig is cooler in Q0S than he is in CR but he's even cooler still in Lay3r Cake!
I saw it the day after his announcement in October, 2005 and within minutes I could see why they wanted him for the role. Similarlay so with Eva Green in The Dreamers.
Lay3r Cake/The Dreamers combo is a must have for James Bond fans. These two dvd's ought to be flanked by Die Another Day and Casino Royale in one's 007 section on one's movie collection case/shelf!
For me, the four year gap is filled nicely by these two films.
Posted 13 August 2009 - 04:49 PM
Well, I don't think it is boring. If someone finds MASTER AND COMMANDER boring, very well, but I'd argue that in this instance, it's probably more his or her fault than it is the film's fault.If you think boring is not a flaw, then sure.
Posted 13 August 2009 - 06:00 PM
Posted 13 August 2009 - 08:32 PM
9) Crash
What the?
I'd probably list that under my least favourites.
Posted 13 August 2009 - 08:39 PM
Edited by I never miss, 13 August 2009 - 08:41 PM.
Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:22 PM
For the record, I didn't like Crash either. I think Haggis is a talented writer, but I just found the film rather heavy-handed and preachy.
Posted 13 August 2009 - 10:40 PM