Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Daniel Craig to star in Steven Spielberg's 'Tintin' (2011)


73 replies to this topic

#1 RivenWinner

RivenWinner

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 256 posts

Posted 26 January 2009 - 07:59 PM

Now on the CBn main page...

Posted Image
Will play opposite Jamie Bell in 3D motion capture feature due in 2011

Posted Image
Steven Spielberg film also stars Jamie Bell, Andy Serkis and Simon Pegg


Well, the Tintin franchise has finally started production today, with news that Danial Craig is set to play the pirate Red Rackham in the first film of the series.

http://www.comingsoo...ws.php?id=52288

Craig has been doing a pretty good job mixing serious dramatic roles with big tent pole films. In the graphic novel, Rackham doesn't really have a large role, so I was hoping Craig would play another character but I'm fine with this. Jamie Bell is set to play Tintin.


As a long time Tintin fan, I really hope Spielberg and Jackson don't mess this up.

#2 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 26 January 2009 - 08:00 PM

Hang On. Isn't Thomas Sangster playing Tintin?

#3 RivenWinner

RivenWinner

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 256 posts

Posted 26 January 2009 - 08:03 PM

Sangster had to drop out sometime ago due to scheduling conflicts. Since then, it's been pure speculation as to who would play Tintin. Today's it official though.

I really hope that they stay true to the novels and the characters.

#4 Qwerty

Qwerty

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 85605 posts
  • Location:New York / Pennsylvania

Posted 26 January 2009 - 08:59 PM

Now on the CBn main page...

Posted Image
Will play opposite Jamie Bell in 3D motion capture feature due in 2011


#5 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 26 January 2009 - 09:14 PM

Surprised at Jamie Bell- seems a bit old for this now.

But a 1930's-set adventure movie directed by Spielberg, written by Dr Who and general sitcom genuis Steven Moffat , the director of Shaun of the Dead (and co-starring the two stars of that) and half of the funniest show on the radio (Adam & Joe) and co-starring James Bond? This is pretty much my dream film.
Tintin? I can take or leave him, but the talent involved makes it unmissable.

And any Bond fan not up to speed on Joe Cornish's work needs to check out this

#6 Jeff007

Jeff007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2076 posts
  • Location:Afghanistan

Posted 26 January 2009 - 09:18 PM

Didn't Craig ask Spielberg, pre Casino Royale, that if he became Bond, would he ever hire him again? Spielberg said yes I believe and now it's true.

#7 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 26 January 2009 - 09:26 PM

For an indie-loving actor, Craig can't get enough of those big franchises, can he? :(

#8 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 26 January 2009 - 09:30 PM

Great news! I don't even remember the role of Red Rackham actually, but I'm sure its been beefed up if Craig is on board.

I suppose Toby Jones will be playing Professor Calculus? And Mackenzie Crook from The (real) Office also on board? Excellent!

#9 crheath

crheath

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 704 posts

Posted 26 January 2009 - 09:55 PM

Daniel Craig in Tintin? &$%@#&@!!! Thundering Typhoons!!!!!

#10 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:01 PM

Daniel Craig in Tintin? &$%@#&@!!! Thundering Typhoons!!!!!


Billions of bilious blue blistering barnacles? Its all coming back to me now...

#11 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:18 PM

Surprised at Jamie Bell- seems a bit old for this now.


Well, I think Sangster was actually too young. I know that Tintin is commonly referred to as "the boy reporter", but I'm not sure that there's anything in the books that says he's anything other than an adult (albeit a young one). After all, he has a job (which apparently comes with the most generous expense account known to man) and his own gaff, and is a demon driver and so on, so it's not as though he's Harry Potter.

A curious thing about the Tintin books is that virtually no one seems to be married or to have a girlfriend (or boyfriend).

The Tintin purist in me does bristle at the film's title, though. It should be THE SECRET OF THE UNICORN.

#12 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:21 PM

Surprised at Jamie Bell- seems a bit old for this now.


Well, I think Sangster was actually too young. I know that Tintin is commonly referred to as "the boy reporter", but I'm not sure that there's anything in the books that says he's anything other than an adult (albeit a young one). After all, he has a job (which apparently comes with the most generous expense account known to man) and his own gaff, and is a demon driver and so on, so it's not as though he's Harry Potter.



Fair point. Doesn't really matter either way of course as he'll simply look like Tintin!

#13 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:33 PM

I think Craig would have been a far more natural choice for Captain Haddock (which Connery would have been superb for back in the day). Same-shaped nose and ears, same strapping physique. Take a look at a photo of Craig with a full beard, imagine the beard a little darker, and perhaps you'll get where I'm coming from.

#14 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:39 PM

I think Craig would have been a far more natural choice for Captain Haddock (which Connery would have been superb for back in the day). Same-shaped nose and ears, same strapping physique. Take a look at a photo of Craig with a full beard, imagine the beard a little darker, and perhaps you'll get where I'm coming from.


It's basically a cartoon, though, so Graham Norton could do it and still look exactly like Haddock. Which annoyingly means that for some reason Serkis gets picked again (is he really the only actor who can do body capture?), but he can't spoil it for me- it just sounds too good.

#15 crheath

crheath

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 704 posts

Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:42 PM

Daniel Craig in Tintin? &$%@#&@!!! Thundering Typhoons!!!!!


Billions of bilious blue blistering barnacles? Its all coming back to me now...


I forgot about that one. I haven't read them in a while.

#16 Mr_Wint

Mr_Wint

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2406 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:54 PM

The only question remains: If they have Spielberg, Jackson and Craig... why not make a real film with good old-fashioned live-action?

#17 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 26 January 2009 - 11:07 PM

The only question remains: If they have Spielberg, Jackson and Craig... why not make a real film with good old-fashioned live-action?


A good question, and personally I'd much prefer to see it that way. There's nothing about Tintin that demands impossible special effects that can't be done in live action, any more than say, an Indiana Jones film.

Still, its Tintin, its Craig, its Gareth from The Office, so I'm there.

I think Craig would have been a far more natural choice for Captain Haddock (which Connery would have been superb for back in the day). Same-shaped nose and ears, same strapping physique. Take a look at a photo of Craig with a full beard, imagine the beard a little darker, and perhaps you'll get where I'm coming from.


It's basically a cartoon, though, so Graham Norton could do it and still look exactly like Haddock. Which annoyingly means that for some reason Serkis gets picked again (is he really the only actor who can do body capture?), but he can't spoil it for me- it just sounds too good.


Well basically he's Jackson's mascot, isn't he? In any case, Craig probably didn't want to be tied to another big franchise and ending up jumping back and forth between Bond and Tintin without having room to do a Low Budget Indie, so this way he can just be a part of it and do one (or will he be in two?)

And just for trivia, this seems to cement Craig's reputation as a "great guy to work with", since he's reuniting with not one, or two, but three people he's worked with before - Toby Jones, Jamie Bell, and Steven Spielberg.

#18 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 26 January 2009 - 11:10 PM

its Gareth from The Office


Really? Who's Crook playing?

And, no, Craig won't be returning for any more Tintin films (unless, of course, he plays someone else). Red Rackham appears only in this story (and even then only in flashback, since his character died decades before "the present day").

#19 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 26 January 2009 - 11:12 PM

Well basically he's Jackson's mascot, isn't he?


Yes, I always wonder why. I mean, he's okay- but he's just another actor. There's nothing great about him.

#20 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 26 January 2009 - 11:20 PM

its Gareth from The Office


Really? Who's Crook playing?


He's just listed in the press release :

"Bell and Craig are joined by an international cast that includes Andy Serkis, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Gad Elmaleh, Toby Jones and Mackenzie Crook."

Any guesses on who he'll be playing, Loomis? I think Toby Jones is an obvious fit for Professor Calculus, but I can't remember much about the supporting cast from that story.

And, no, Craig won't be returning for any more Tintin films (unless, of course, he plays someone else). Red Rackham appears only in this story (and even then only in flashback, since his character died decades before "the present day").


Well this is odd then. Craig showing up for what is basically a flashback cameo, yet the press release has worded it so that he's The Villain of the film. I wonder if his role has been beefed up or if they've changed the part to a modern day pirate...hmm, do we know what time period this film is going to be set in, anyway?

#21 deth

deth

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2651 posts
  • Location:Berlin, Germany

Posted 26 January 2009 - 11:24 PM

I'm a little confused as to how Red Rackham merits such a big star as Craig (which he now surely is)? It's a tiny almost insignificant role in the story...

#22 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 26 January 2009 - 11:28 PM

its Gareth from The Office


Really? Who's Crook playing?


He's just listed in the press release :

"Bell and Craig are joined by an international cast that includes Andy Serkis, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Gad Elmaleh, Toby Jones and Mackenzie Crook."

Any guesses on who he'll be playing, Loomis? I think Toby Jones is an obvious fit for Professor Calculus, but I can't remember much about the supporting cast from that story.

And, no, Craig won't be returning for any more Tintin films (unless, of course, he plays someone else). Red Rackham appears only in this story (and even then only in flashback, since his character died decades before "the present day").


Well this is odd then. Craig showing up for what is basically a flashback cameo, yet the press release has worded it so that he's The Villain of the film. I wonder if his role has been beefed up or if they've changed the part to a modern day pirate...hmm, do we know what time period this film is going to be set in, anyway?


I don't know. I certainly wouldn't want to see Tintin with a laptop and mobile phone, put it that way. And, no, I can't begin to guess who Crook is playing.

It may be that Red Rackham's part has been beefed up, but I'm guessing it's only a small role that Craig is doing for fun and as a bit of a favour to his old buddy Spielberg (oh, and for a small amount of cash, too, of course!).

#23 HildebrandRarity

HildebrandRarity

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4361 posts

Posted 27 January 2009 - 12:17 AM

For an indie-loving actor, Craig can't get enough of those big franchises, can he? :(


I suppose he's mixing it up? Plus from what it seems, it's not a large role so I imagine he's not getting mega bucks for doing it. Everyone likes to work...and Craig's no different, as long as he likes the script, etc.

#24 Pierce - Daniel

Pierce - Daniel

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 719 posts

Posted 27 January 2009 - 12:36 AM

I'm sure Craig has been pegged as the main villain. Tintin dosen't sounds like the sort of fiulm to have the depth to add flashback scenes. It's a kids film, a bit of a romp. I'm sure Craig is the film's main villain, hense the casting of such a famous actor, whether he is just in the first film or is the villain in the triogly, i don't know.

#25 Vauxhall

Vauxhall

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10744 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 27 January 2009 - 01:43 AM

Interesting role for Craig. Will be good to see him reunite with Jamie Bell anyway, who I think was the surprise star of DEFIANCE.

#26 deth

deth

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2651 posts
  • Location:Berlin, Germany

Posted 27 January 2009 - 02:16 AM

I'm sure Craig has been pegged as the main villain. Tintin dosen't sounds like the sort of fiulm to have the depth to add flashback scenes. It's a kids film, a bit of a romp. I'm sure Craig is the film's main villain, hense the casting of such a famous actor, whether he is just in the first film or is the villain in the triogly, i don't know.



you haven't ever read the comics then have you...

#27 MrMoneypenny

MrMoneypenny

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 182 posts
  • Location:Sherman Oaks, CA

Posted 27 January 2009 - 02:36 AM

The only question remains: If they have Spielberg, Jackson and Craig... why not make a real film with good old-fashioned live-action?


OMG!!!! I think I just died and went to Heaven!!!!! My two biggest passions, Bond and Tintin, combined into one single movie!!!!! F'ING AMAZING!!!!

The reason why this movie is not live-action is that Herge, the author of Tintin who passed away in 1983, was never a big fan of the previous live-action Tintin films. Spielberg and Jackson want to create a unique Tintin universe without losing the Herge-style.

And for those who think this will be a kids film? Think again. Tintin is for everyone between the ages of 7 and 77 ... and beyond!

Wow, this is THE best birthday present EVER!!!! (can you tell I'm excited?)

#28 honeyjes

honeyjes

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 183 posts

Posted 27 January 2009 - 07:18 AM

I'm a little confused as to how Red Rackham merits such a big star as Craig (which he now surely is)? It's a tiny almost insignificant role in the story...


I think DC just likes to mix it up a bit, his name being attached to this may also have swayed the powers that be to invest in getting this made, also Daniel has a history of helping out a friend, The Jacket, Golden Compass, FOAF etc, one of the endearing things about him is he doesn't seem to forget the people who have helped to put him where he is today.

#29 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 27 January 2009 - 07:28 AM

But a 1930's-set adventure movie directed by Spielberg, written by Dr Who and general sitcom genuis Steven Moffat , the director of Shaun of the Dead (and co-starring the two stars of that) and half of the funniest show on the radio (Adam & Joe) and co-starring James Bond? This is pretty much my dream film.
Tintin? I can take or leave him, but the talent involved makes it unmissable.

Entirely agreed. :(

#30 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 27 January 2009 - 08:08 AM

its Gareth from The Office


Really? Who's Crook playing?


He's just listed in the press release :

"Bell and Craig are joined by an international cast that includes Andy Serkis, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Gad Elmaleh, Toby Jones and Mackenzie Crook."

Any guesses on who he'll be playing, Loomis? I think Toby Jones is an obvious fit for Professor Calculus, but I can't remember much about the supporting cast from that story.

And, no, Craig won't be returning for any more Tintin films (unless, of course, he plays someone else). Red Rackham appears only in this story (and even then only in flashback, since his character died decades before "the present day").


Well this is odd then. Craig showing up for what is basically a flashback cameo, yet the press release has worded it so that he's The Villain of the film. I wonder if his role has been beefed up or if they've changed the part to a modern day pirate...hmm, do we know what time period this film is going to be set in, anyway?


I don't know. I certainly wouldn't want to see Tintin with a laptop and mobile phone, put it that way. And, no, I can't begin to guess who Crook is playing.

It may be that Red Rackham's part has been beefed up, but I'm guessing it's only a small role that Craig is doing for fun and as a bit of a favour to his old buddy Spielberg (oh, and for a small amount of cash, too, of course!).


Well hopefully one of the usual suspects will have a script review sooner or later. I'll throw out some speculation that Craig will be playing both the 'old' Red Rackham and his descendant, who is a rival/old foe of Captain Haddock.