The Desert
#1
Posted 20 January 2009 - 09:11 PM
#2
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:00 PM
#3
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:02 PM
#4
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:05 PM
Why, out of all places, did Forster pick the Atacama Desert for the film's climactic (sort of) ending? I had heard a rumour that the Swiss Alps was supposed to be the location where the end scene would take place...I do like the desert setting, don't get me wrong, but why not the Alps, which are more exotic?
Well, it all depends on your definition of exoticism. To a European audience, the Alps don't sound exotic at all, but the atacama desert does
I found the desert location very well fitted for both the cinematography of this movie (stylish and spare), and the state of the characters' emotions (although the Alps, with their jagged skyline and threatening heights, could have worked well too).
#5
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:11 PM
And Mister *, I think I remember Forster saying that he wanted the Alps for the movies climax.
#6
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:17 PM
And Mister *, I think I remember Forster saying that he wanted the Alps for the movies climax.
Cool. Thanks for the correction, MHark. Staying spoiler free I missed some stuff.
#7
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:23 PM
"...where Haggis had the film conclude in a flurry of snow- harkening to the alpine cool of OHMSS - Forster pictured Bond against a desert".
It quotes Forster saying "in the desert, its unforgiving. You're out there and you might die"
So there!
#8
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:26 PM
#9
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:40 PM
#10
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:44 PM
#11
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:46 PM
Personally, I would've loved to see him shivering in the snow, cradling his wounded leg. Nasty Individual.
Haha! You make a good point there Mharkin!
#12
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:48 PM
The desert reflects Bond's emotional state. He's just lost Vesper, he's lonely. He needs time for contemplation. I think Forster mentioned it in an interview, and his reasons for picking it. I think it was in Total Film, but I'm not too sure.
Bla bla bla
I dont care about Bond's emotional state
I want to have a good entertainment from Bond movie not study of his emotions
And i dont care what you say
#13
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:50 PM
The desert reflects Bond's emotional state. He's just lost Vesper, he's lonely. He needs time for contemplation. I think Forster mentioned it in an interview, and his reasons for picking it. I think it was in Total Film, but I'm not too sure.
Bla bla bla
I dont care about Bond's emotional state
I want to have a good entertainment from Bond movie not study of his emotions
And i dont care what you say
I didn't ask you too.
#14
Posted 20 January 2009 - 10:53 PM
The desert reflects Bond's emotional state. He's just lost Vesper, he's lonely. He needs time for contemplation. I think Forster mentioned it in an interview, and his reasons for picking it. I think it was in Total Film, but I'm not too sure.
Bla bla bla
I dont care about Bond's emotional state
I want to have a good entertainment from Bond movie not study of his emotions
And i dont care what you say
I didn't ask you too.
LOL! But in response to Colonel Moon's post, it's ideas such as this that make Marc Forster the great cinematographist he is. True, his action set-pieces weren't brilliant, but you can blame the second unit for that mostly. But as far as location shots go, Forster nailed it.
#15
Posted 20 January 2009 - 11:00 PM
I contend that I consider desert sand better entertainment than Alpine snow.I want to have a good entertainment from Bond movie not study of his emotions
Oh.And i dont care what you say
#16
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:27 AM
The desert reflects Bond's emotional state. He's just lost Vesper, he's lonely. He needs time for contemplation. I think Forster mentioned it in an interview, and his reasons for picking it. I think it was in Total Film, but I'm not too sure.
Bla bla bla
I dont care about Bond's emotional state
I want to have a good entertainment from Bond movie not study of his emotions
And i dont care what you say
Oh, SNAP!
#17
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:27 AM
#18
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:43 AM
#19
Posted 21 January 2009 - 03:46 AM
#20
Posted 21 January 2009 - 08:17 AM
The desert reflects Bond's emotional state. He's just lost Vesper, he's lonely. He needs time for contemplation. I think Forster mentioned it in an interview, and his reasons for picking it. I think it was in Total Film, but I'm not too sure.
Bla bla bla
I dont care about Bond's emotional state
I want to have a good entertainment from Bond movie not study of his emotions
And i dont care what you say
There's 20 other movies out there that don't care about Bond's emotional state. You can have them, I'll enjoy QoS for developing Bond as a character thank you very much
#21
Posted 21 January 2009 - 08:58 AM
That is the official version, yes. The truth is that MK12 couldn't find any fitting Font Styles for the Swiss Alps, so they had to rethink the whole thing.The desert reflects Bond's emotional state. He's just lost Vesper, he's lonely. He needs time for contemplation. I think Forster mentioned it in an interview, and his reasons for picking it. I think it was in Total Film, but I'm not too sure.
#22
Posted 21 January 2009 - 04:52 PM
(I don't count DAF. For much of anything, actually.)
And Quantum (via Greene Planet) originally had their eyes on owning and controlling the ozone layer…That is the official version, yes. The truth is that MK12 couldn't find any fitting Fonts Styles for the Swiss Alps, so they had to rethink the whole thing.The desert reflects Bond's emotional state. He's just lost Vesper, he's lonely. He needs time for contemplation. I think Forster mentioned it in an interview, and his reasons for picking it. I think it was in Total Film, but I'm not too sure.
Sure. Makes sense.
#23
Posted 21 January 2009 - 10:23 PM
It's not like I hated the desert setting. I thought that the desert was an interesting place to set the villain's lair. I just thought that it would be more interesting if the finale had taken place in the Alps.Well, it all depends on your definition of exoticism. To a European audience, the Alps don't sound exotic at all, but the atacama desert does
I found the desert location very well fitted for both the cinematography of this movie (stylish and spare), and the state of the characters' emotions (although the Alps, with their jagged skyline and threatening heights, could have worked well too).
#24
Posted 21 January 2009 - 10:36 PM
The story is also about Greene monopolizing the water supply. It's more difficult to do that in the Alps.
Absolutely. Doesn't the plot of the film logically suggest that its climax would be suitably situated in a desert? Shouldn't setting and plot be ideally intertwined? The villain's motives throughout, one of the driving mysteries of the film, concerns depriving a drought-stricken population of their most precious natural resource. It seems to me that a desert--which is certainly extreme and deadly enough an environ to provide the backdrop for a proper Bond adventure--is the setting that would most complement the film's story.
#25
Posted 22 January 2009 - 12:11 AM
Death of green, too. Green being plants, Dominic Greene, freshness, vegetation, life and so on.It's also a more sinister place for the death of Greene.
And Greene sought to rob everyone of water. His death in the desert (which is pretty much devoid of water) is very appropriate because he died in what he sought to create- a place lacking in water. That's my thoughts.
#26
Posted 22 January 2009 - 12:20 AM
And people said QOS was shallow entertainment...
#27
Posted 22 January 2009 - 03:09 AM
Besides, after all the snow scenes in the Brosnan era, it's nice to have gotten away from that for a couple of films. The desert has been underused in the series, as has South America, largely. It worked out better.
If they want snow or a frigid area, go instead to Alaska or the Arctic, which was used to good effect in Gardner's Icebreaker. Eon has freely taken parts out of the other Gardner books for the films. I'd be interested in seeing the ice torture scene, one of the more original tortures in the entire series, just as long as it didn't look like they were trying to redo the CR torture scene.
#28
Posted 25 January 2009 - 09:06 AM
But why go to the Swiss Alps simply becase they're more exotic? The entire point of the new continuity is to get away from the tired old methods, but still retain the James Bond feeling. The Swiss Alps might be exotic and spectacular, but they're also a pretty obvious choice.Why, out of all places, did Forster pick the Atacama Desert for the film's climactic (sort of) ending? I had heard a rumour that the Swiss Alps was supposed to be the location where the end scene would take place...I do like the desert setting, don't get me wrong, but why not the Alps, which are more exotic?
#29
Posted 26 January 2009 - 02:55 AM
From what I understood, Eon actually has the rights to the continuation novels but chose not to do anything with them. Heard this years ago, probably in the '80s. Somebody else can probably give more insight into that.Turn, I don't think they intentionally dipped into the Gardner and Benson books. Or even unintentionally; if they had, Gardner would have had something to say about it.
There's a thread somewhere in the literary section counting all the similarities between the continuation novels and the films.
#30
Posted 26 January 2009 - 03:24 AM
From what I understood, Eon actually has the rights to the continuation novels but chose not to do anything with them. Heard this years ago, probably in the '80s. Somebody else can probably give more insight into that.Turn, I don't think they intentionally dipped into the Gardner and Benson books. Or even unintentionally; if they had, Gardner would have had something to say about it.
There's a thread somewhere in the literary section counting all the similarities between the continuation novels and the films.
Here is a CBn article:
http://commanderbond.net/article/520