Could Mr white be a main villian for bond 23?
#1
Posted 11 January 2009 - 04:35 AM
of you think No are there any unused fleming names u'd like to see for bond 23's villian?
#2
Posted 11 January 2009 - 04:37 AM
Edited by BlackFire, 11 January 2009 - 04:38 AM.
#3
Posted 11 January 2009 - 04:38 AM
#4
Posted 11 January 2009 - 04:43 AM
MIIIII-STER WHITE!!!
(BOM... BAH-DAH-BAH-DAH-BUM...)
HE'S THE MAN, THE MAN
WITH THE QUAAANTUM TOUCH...
(BOM... BAH-DAH-BAH-DAH-BUM...)
A SHWANTUM TOUCH!!!
#5
Posted 11 January 2009 - 06:35 AM
Pretty girl, before of his knee of plight
He's MIIIISSTER WHITE!!!
#6
Posted 11 January 2009 - 09:00 AM
Edited by Dainshdude118, 11 January 2009 - 09:00 AM.
#7
Posted 11 January 2009 - 12:51 PM
#8
Posted 11 January 2009 - 03:11 PM
oh neither do i and i would be pissed if he was personaly i view Mr White as sort of Quantum's 007 he gets in takes care of the quantum member who might talk and get's out. In fact his mission in Casino Royale is similar to 007's (get the money at all costs.TBH, I don't think he's the head of quantum cus Bond's allready shot and captured him once, in the process stripping the character of his enigma. I love his character tho' and defenately want to see him in another film.
as for plots i dunno.
#9
Posted 11 January 2009 - 03:20 PM
As a side note, however, in QoS, White was at Tosca, listening in on the plan. That makes me think that he may not necessarily be the head of Quantum...
#10
Posted 11 January 2009 - 07:48 PM
#11
Posted 11 January 2009 - 09:59 PM
Act 1: Scheming
Mr White and the other power players discuss the mission in hand.
Act 2: Recruiting
It could be interesting to see Mr White finding the businessmen, terrorists and mercenaries needed to complete the task. How much does he tell them, what does Quantum offer them? Is it just about the money or is there something more?
Act 3 Execution
With all the pawns in place whatever operation they have planned goes into effect.
Bond meanwhile is monitoring one of the pawns (or something) on what should have been a straight forward assignment, but things get more complicated with the arrival of Mr White.
Still no idea on what the actual scheme would be, but probably terrorism, revenge or extortion.
#12
Posted 12 January 2009 - 02:44 AM
I just can't swallow the idea of him being the man behind it all. His behaviour and his lines indicate that he's answering to someone. For example, he knew of Bond's involvement with Le Chiffre, and yet he collected the money from the tournament in person. Why would he risk doing something like that if he wee at the head of the organisations? He already knows that Bond is a threat, and if he were the one in charge, he could simply have killed Bond in the boat, and forced Vesper to acquire the winnings another way.
Likewise at Tosca: he felt no need to make his presence known to the other members of Quantum. But by the he knew that Bond posed a danger to the organisation, and likely was aware of the absence of the man with the gift bag. It wouldn't be difficult to put two and two together and come up with the idea that Bond was in place. Why risk himself like that when he could just send a trusted lieutenant to the performance and report everything back to him?
White as a Big Bad wouldn't work as well as his current role does. That's not to say that it won't work full stop, but rather that he's better off as a high-level enforcer pulling the strings from the background than he is in the spotlight. And besides, the original ending to QUANTUM OF SOLACE - what is set to appear on DVD - has Bond confronting White for the final time because Bond supposedly kills him.
#13
Posted 12 January 2009 - 02:43 PM
he has great villian potential just not as a lead villian
if EON decide to continue bonds vengance quest against quantum they could use mr whites girlfreind from the opera as the lead bond girl(ive posted this on another thread..her name is elizabeth arcinega http://www.imdb.com/...06496/nm0033845 )
she could betray mr white and help bond persue the remaining quantum members.
#14
Posted 12 January 2009 - 02:49 PM
But like BlackFire says, Daniel said there is no trilogy on the cards - so I'm worried that could leave Mr White out of the equation for Bond 23.
#15
Posted 12 January 2009 - 02:53 PM
#16
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:19 AM
Edited by Martini, 13 January 2009 - 11:21 AM.
#17
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:28 AM
#18
Posted 15 January 2009 - 10:52 AM
#19
Posted 21 January 2009 - 06:50 PM
My idea is this in The property of a Lady (bond 23) Mr White acts like Le Chiffe or Dominic Greene as the overseer of a plan of his own design backed by Quantum. there would be a new villian in a glorified Henchman role (perhaps the characters name could be Ultric Von Hammerstien) Haines i see as an expendability either killed off or briefly mentioned that he died in prison under mysterious cirumstances. we learn that there is defintly a council above Mr white (though we learn none of there names) and that there may be a head of quantum (i can imagine a cool scene where someone would prefer death then utter his name like the begining of TWINE but actually cool and not cheesy)
I think it's the best of both worlds we get more of Mr White (who had some of the best lines in Casino and Quantum plus the news papers can't saay anything as they will assume mr glorfied henchmen is the real main villian of bond 23.
#20
Posted 21 January 2009 - 07:37 PM
I do not want Mr White to be the head of Quantum However I;'d like him to have more screen time in bond 23.
My idea is this in The property of a Lady (bond 23) Mr White acts like Le Chiffe or Dominic Greene as the overseer of a plan of his own design backed by Quantum. there would be a new villian in a glorified Henchman role (perhaps the characters name could be Ultric Von Hammerstien) Haines i see as an expendability either killed off or briefly mentioned that he died in prison under mysterious cirumstances. we learn that there is defintly a council above Mr white (though we learn none of there names) and that there may be a head of quantum (i can imagine a cool scene where someone would prefer death then utter his name like the begining of TWINE but actually cool and not cheesy)
I think it's the best of both worlds we get more of Mr White (who had some of the best lines in Casino and Quantum plus the news papers can't saay anything as they will assume mr glorfied henchmen is the real main villian of bond 23.
I like your idea. I never could see Mr. White as head of Quantum, considering some of his actions in CASINO ROYALE - like killing Le Chiffre and his henchmen or appearing in Venice to collect the money from Vesper and Gettler. Those are not the actions of someone heading a criminal organization.
#21
Posted 16 May 2009 - 04:12 AM
#22
Posted 16 May 2009 - 04:22 AM
#23
Posted 21 May 2009 - 04:10 PM
Either that, or kill him off in the PTS.
Not sure about that - such an action would be rather a kick in the teeth for CR and QOS (reminds me of Hicks and Newt being killed off at the start of Alien 3).
Still, I guess Eon sort of killed off Blofeld in the pre-titles of FYEO, so anything's possible....
#24
Posted 21 May 2009 - 05:19 PM
I picture it this way it's the end of a bond film White's Dead and many assume the orgnization is done and bond get's a note "thanks for killing of our most troublesome ooperative sincerly Quantum"
How cool would that be
#25
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:32 PM
Then, like Mr. *, I'd like to see the real finale play out in Bond 24. And maybe a post-Quantum Bond v. Ex-Quantum chief (if there is a chief) in 25, a la YOLT.
#26
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:34 PM
I'd like to see Bond 23 seem to have nothing to do qith Quantum, only to have the end reveal that Quantum is, in fact, involved or invested in whatever scheme is going down. Sort of how Goldfinger in the novel seems to be independent, only to turn out to be the treasurer for SMERSH.
I like this idea.
Perhaps also leave the film thinking that Bond has completed his mission successfully, only for him to realize just moments before the credits role that he had been somehow tricked or used by QUANTUM to carry out their own scheme.
#27
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:46 PM
As long as he isn't pitted against his own agency yet again, I'm down with an idea like that.I'd like to see Bond 23 seem to have nothing to do qith Quantum, only to have the end reveal that Quantum is, in fact, involved or invested in whatever scheme is going down. Sort of how Goldfinger in the novel seems to be independent, only to turn out to be the treasurer for SMERSH.
I like this idea.
Perhaps also leave the film thinking that Bond has completed his mission successfully, only for him to realize just moments before the credits role that he had been somehow tricked or used by QUANTUM to carry out their own scheme.
#28
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:48 PM
As long as he isn't pitted against his own agency yet again, I'm down with an idea like that.I'd like to see Bond 23 seem to have nothing to do qith Quantum, only to have the end reveal that Quantum is, in fact, involved or invested in whatever scheme is going down. Sort of how Goldfinger in the novel seems to be independent, only to turn out to be the treasurer for SMERSH.
I like this idea.
Perhaps also leave the film thinking that Bond has completed his mission successfully, only for him to realize just moments before the credits role that he had been somehow tricked or used by QUANTUM to carry out their own scheme.
No, definitely not against his own agency again. Like just about everyone else on these boards, I think that that storyline has run its course and shouldn't return to the franchise for at least another decade or two.
It could be done in one of those scenes (and this is an overly simplistic depiction of how it could potentially go) where M and Bond are talking at the end, and it's somehow revealed to them that they've been doing QUANTUM's bidding the entire time without ever actually knowing it.
#29
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:53 PM
#30
Posted 21 May 2009 - 09:49 PM