
The Bourne Legacy (2012)
#91
Posted 06 September 2009 - 08:05 PM
#95
Posted 12 September 2009 - 02:20 PM
#96
Posted 12 September 2009 - 03:18 PM
Even if BOURNE 4 turns out to be a carbon copy of SUPREMACY and ULTIMATUM, I'm certain it'll still be a far better film than most of the Bonds.
Why?
#97
Posted 12 September 2009 - 03:39 PM
#98
Posted 12 September 2009 - 04:38 PM
Because SUPREMACY and ULTIMATUM are far better films than most of the Bonds.
Oh. I actually liked all three although I do think that SUPREMACY was the best of them and ULTIMATUM the weakest.
#99
Posted 10 October 2009 - 08:33 PM
I wish they'd get Liman back for the next film!
#100
Posted 11 October 2009 - 07:49 AM
Totally agree. Doug Liman did a great job with The Bourne Identity even if it wasn't like the book. It's even nicer being that it's the one Bourne film that you can actually follow the action. It also has the best plot/story.I still think Identity was the best of the three. Doug Liman had the best handle on blending action, drama and humour in these films. Under Greengrass, they've become heavy-handed, overly serious and look like they've been shot by a cameraman who's having an epileptic fit!!!
I wish they'd get Liman back for the next film!
#101
Posted 11 October 2009 - 07:57 AM
I don't see the point of doing Bourne 4 unless it's exceptionally good, and it seems Damon and Greengrass agrees with me.
#102
Posted 11 October 2009 - 12:26 PM
That´s my opinion, too. What really bothers me with BS and BU is not so much the shaky cam but the fact that they used the script from Identity again and only changed some names. The books are really good with an interesting plot and great sequences so why use nothing from them and instead kill Marie?! I really like the movies but I hate the nonexistent storyline. It´s like they stretched BI to a six-hour chase with no meaning.Totally agree. Doug Liman did a great job with The Bourne Identity even if it wasn't like the book. It's even nicer being that it's the one Bourne film that you can actually follow the action. It also has the best plot/story.I still think Identity was the best of the three. Doug Liman had the best handle on blending action, drama and humour in these films. Under Greengrass, they've become heavy-handed, overly serious and look like they've been shot by a cameraman who's having an epileptic fit!!!
I wish they'd get Liman back for the next film!
#103
Posted 11 October 2009 - 06:32 PM
That´s my opinion, too. What really bothers me with BS and BU is not so much the shaky cam but the fact that they used the script from Identity again and only changed some names. The books are really good with an interesting plot and great sequences so why use nothing from them and instead kill Marie?! I really like the movies but I hate the nonexistent storyline. It´s like they stretched BI to a six-hour chase with no meaning.Totally agree. Doug Liman did a great job with The Bourne Identity even if it wasn't like the book. It's even nicer being that it's the one Bourne film that you can actually follow the action. It also has the best plot/story.I still think Identity was the best of the three. Doug Liman had the best handle on blending action, drama and humour in these films. Under Greengrass, they've become heavy-handed, overly serious and look like they've been shot by a cameraman who's having an epileptic fit!!!
I wish they'd get Liman back for the next film!
Because Carlos is actually real. The Bourne's often beat the living hell out of the Bonds, and are very well put together. The cinematography just isn't for everyone.
#104
Posted 28 October 2009 - 04:19 AM
#105
Posted 28 October 2009 - 06:00 AM

#106
Posted 28 October 2009 - 10:58 AM
Well for those of us anxious for something Bourne like, here's the trailer for the Damon/Greengrass film Green Zone
Thank God Hollywood is giving us another Iraq movie. Everybody loves those.
#107
Posted 28 October 2009 - 11:08 AM
#108
Posted 28 October 2009 - 12:03 PM
Man, I wish it was Bourne 4 in Iraq.
That's certainly what it looks like. GREEN ZONE looks more like an action thriller than the restrained drama I was expecting, and at least half of this trailer does indeed look like Bourne in Iraq.
THE HURT LOCKER (which I loved) seems like the kind of Iraq movie that you'd assume would be made by the director of UNITED 93 - a film with more emphasis on atmosphere, claustrophobia and suspense than on action. But GREEN ZONE looks more like the sort of Iraq movie Ridley Scott would make.
#109
Posted 28 October 2009 - 12:32 PM
Man, I wish it was Bourne 4 in Iraq.
That's certainly what it looks like. GREEN ZONE looks more like an action thriller than the restrained drama I was expecting, and at least half of this trailer does indeed look like Bourne in Iraq.
THE HURT LOCKER (which I loved) seems like the kind of Iraq movie that you'd assume would be made by the director of UNITED 93 - a film with more emphasis on atmosphere, claustrophobia and suspense than on action. But GREEN ZONE looks more like the sort of Iraq movie Ridley Scott would make.
Which I think may actually be the reason for these films turning out in this particular manner: to shake up most of our expectations. Not completely pull the rug, but give us an element of unexpected style.
#110
Posted 28 October 2009 - 01:10 PM
That does not mean I don´t like this trailer or the film. I´m interested.
But I´m also a bit disappointed. I was under the impression that Greengrass and Damon wanted to do something else, a much more political film. Seems like they chose to go commercial and repeat the formula.
#111
Posted 28 October 2009 - 04:31 PM
Man, I wish it was Bourne 4 in Iraq.
That's certainly what it looks like. GREEN ZONE looks more like an action thriller than the restrained drama I was expecting, and at least half of this trailer does indeed look like Bourne in Iraq.
I was expecting a 2/3 hr lecture on how "calamitous" the choice to go to Iraq was by the Bush administration...this looks like it could actually be fun.
#112
Posted 28 October 2009 - 04:33 PM
#113
Posted 10 November 2009 - 02:10 PM
Hmm. Really feels like a "Bourne"-film. Has the same basic principle: Agent turns against his superior after finding out their true intentions.
Well, given Greengrass and Damon are raving lefties, it's no surprise that they hate the military, the CIA and so on. After all, if it wasn't for the military, the CIA etc, they'd be living in the Soviet Union, which is clearly what they really want!

#114
Posted 10 November 2009 - 02:14 PM
And your evidence to support this comes from where...?Well, given Greengrass and Damon are raving lefties
#115
Posted 10 November 2009 - 02:14 PM
And your evidence to support this comes from where...?Well, given Greengrass and Damon are raving lefties
#116
Posted 10 November 2009 - 02:14 PM
And your evidence to support this comes from where...?Well, given Greengrass and Damon are raving lefties
#117
Posted 10 November 2009 - 03:50 PM
And your evidence to support this comes from where...?Well, given Greengrass and Damon are raving lefties
Only thing I can think of is Geometry. According to Descartes, there must be a set of coordinates from which everything else is perceived as 'raving leftist'.

Not sure what it's telling more about, the object of observation or the observer...
#118
Posted 10 November 2009 - 05:02 PM
Well, given Greengrass and Damon are raving lefties, it's no surprise that they hate the military, the CIA and so on. After all, if it wasn't for the military, the CIA etc, they'd be living in the Soviet Union, which is clearly what they really want!
Why should Greengrass and Damon's political views matter to us?
#119
Posted 10 November 2009 - 05:33 PM
Well, given Greengrass and Damon are raving lefties, it's no surprise that they hate the military, the CIA and so on. After all, if it wasn't for the military, the CIA etc, they'd be living in the Soviet Union, which is clearly what they really want!
Why should Greengrass and Damon's political views matter to us?
When Greengrass took over Bourne, the films automatically took a strong left wing/liberal slant. Remember Greengrass's attack on Bond saying that he represents the establishment while Bourne is the people's hero? Take a look at any of Greengrass's past work to see his stance.
Damon's affiliations to the so-called 'Hollywood Left' are well known and were spoofed in Team America where he was portrayed as a member of the Film Actors' Guild.
In The Bourne Ultimatum, they even had to feature The Guardian as the paper of choice to reveal the truth about Bourne, which is ironic as The Guardian's journalism has long been a joke, even among those who work for it!
Before Greengrass, Bourne was an exciting adventure film where a rogue agent from a secret black-ops division tries to bring down the enemy. It was fun. Under Greengrass, a political agenda became overt, Marie was stupidly killed off, robbing the films of their humanity and the films' supposed 'message' was relentlessly hammered home.
As far as I'm concerned, Greengrass with his humourless political tubthumping has spoiled what should be an exceiting spy series.
Edited by Gabriel, 10 November 2009 - 05:36 PM.
#120
Posted 10 November 2009 - 05:51 PM
Hmm. Really feels like a "Bourne"-film. Has the same basic principle: Agent turns against his superior after finding out their true intentions.
Well, given Greengrass and Damon are raving lefties, it's no surprise that they hate the military, the CIA and so on. After all, if it wasn't for the military, the CIA etc, they'd be living in the Soviet Union, which is clearly what they really want!
LOL

Of course they'd have their meals,fine wines,toilet paper,Levis and various goods we evil capitalist pigs take for granted..etc. flown in from France!

That is the huge irony of lefties: they hate the military, CIA, corporations and "authority" and yet they admire countries with authoritarian goverments that, while they provide free (crappy) healthcare, they deny freedom of expression, property rights,...etc and detain indefinately or kill their own citizens without due process whenever they please.
Re: Greengrass/Damon's politics: They haven't affected the movies-yet. As long as they are kick
