237 replies to this topic

[coco1997]

A third film is not happening. Certainly it won't be out next year, if ever.

[tdalton]

A third film is not happening. Certainly it won't be out next year, if ever.

Sadly, I'd have to agree. It did seem like, at least for a minute or so last year that it might actually happen, but it's pretty much a done deal now that it won't be. As crushed as I am that it's not ever going to make it to the big screen, perhaps it's for the best considering the same creative team behind Year One was being tasked with creating an original story designed to introduce a new generation of Ghostbusters.

[coco1997]

A third film is not happening. Certainly it won't be out next year, if ever.

Sadly, I'd have to agree. It did seem like, at least for a minute or so last year that it might actually happen, but it's pretty much a done deal now that it won't be. As crushed as I am that it's not ever going to make it to the big screen, perhaps it's for the best considering the same creative team behind Year One was being tasked with creating an original story designed to introduce a new generation of Ghostbusters.

I had faith in Akroyd's words that the writers had finally come up with a satisfying, fresh script that would please everyone (or at least, almost everyone), but none of that matters if Murray can't bring himself to sign off on it. No Murray, no Ghostbusters.

[iBond]

The second film is very underrated.

Very.

[Safari Suit]

I have a certain level of fondness for it, because I watched it a lot as a kid. It does have a pretty decent plot, and Vigo and whatever Peter McNicholl's character is called make good villians. But it's one of those films where you suspect there was at least one committee meeting before each scene was shot, and as a comedy, well, it simply isn't funny.

As for Ghostbusters III, don't count on it.

[tdalton]

I really enjoy the second film as well, and would even put it on par with the first. That might be due to some kind of a nostalgia factor, though, as Ghostbusters II will always be kind of a special movie for me as it's the first film that I remember seeing in the theater. While it's a shame that Ghostbusters III won't be happening, I can't say that I'm at all surprised. After getting my hopes up every few years when they tried to get this thing kickstarted, I've reached a point that even a greenlight by the studio doesn't really mean anything to me anymore regarding this project. I'll believe the rumors on this one when a trailer actually arrives for it, and even then I'll still think it's probably a joke.

[coco1997]

I really enjoy the second film as well, and would even put it on par with the first. That might be due to some kind of a nostalgia factor, though, as Ghostbusters II will always be kind of a special movie for me as it's the first film that I remember seeing in the theater.

I'm in the same boat, t. I never saw "Ghostbusters 2" theaters, but I'm certain I saw it before the original film, and I have a bit of an affinity for it.

Although I'm sure "GB3" will never happen, I would be satisfied if the script for it, or even the script for the abandoned "Hellbent" project from the mid-90s, surfaced online.

[tdalton]

I really enjoy the second film as well, and would even put it on par with the first. That might be due to some kind of a nostalgia factor, though, as Ghostbusters II will always be kind of a special movie for me as it's the first film that I remember seeing in the theater.

I'm in the same boat, t. I never saw "Ghostbusters 2" theaters, but I'm certain I saw it before the original film, and I have a bit of an affinity for it.

Although I'm sure "GB3" will never happen, I would be satisfied if the script for it, or even the script for the abandoned "Hellbent" project from the mid-90s, surfaced online.

I'd love to see the "Hellbent" script as well. That sounded like a truly unique project that would have made for a fantastic third film.

[iBond]

I really enjoy the second film as well, and would even put it on par with the first. That might be due to some kind of a nostalgia factor, though, as Ghostbusters II will always be kind of a special movie for me as it's the first film that I remember seeing in the theater. While it's a shame that Ghostbusters III won't be happening, I can't say that I'm at all surprised. After getting my hopes up every few years when they tried to get this thing kickstarted, I've reached a point that even a greenlight by the studio doesn't really mean anything to me anymore regarding this project. I'll believe the rumors on this one when a trailer actually arrives for it, and even then I'll still think it's probably a joke.

Yeah, I'm starting to believe the same thing. If a trailer comes out, then I will believe it for sure. But as of now, IMDb is known to put things up and then take them down once nothing is happening. For example, they had information on Jurassic Park IV, but since that's not not going to happen, they took it down. So, most likely the same is going to happen with Ghostbusters III. I mean, already with a 2012 release date and nothing is in the works, most likely it was just something to get our hopes up with. I mean, the actors are all pretty much old now. I mean, the guy that played Egon has gotten really out of shape. But, if it does happen, then I will be thrilled. If not, at least the information was out there for a possibility.

According to IMDb, Sigoureny Weaver let slip that Bill Murray would play a ghost in the film. But, this is all merely speculation. Anyway, I guess we will just have to wait and see what happens...or what doesn't happen.

As for Ghostbusters II, I had a birthday party back in 1990 that had the car come and two look-a-likes host the party. It was fun haha! I got a proton pack and one of the dudes dressed up as Stay Puft and he would slowly melt to the ground as I would shoot him with the pack. Hahaha, fun times!

Edited by iBond, 12 June 2011 - 05:38 PM.

[tdalton]

I don't think that it was done simply to get everyone's hopes up. Judging from the history of the project, this was probably the closest it's ever come to actually happening. It seems like everyone other than Bill Murray is on board for this. There actually is a completed script that has apparently been approved by most of the people involved, the studio apparently gave it the go ahead, and Reitman was said to be back to direct. This is just my take from reading all of the articles about the film in the last year or so, but it really does seem like there are only a couple of things holding it up at this point.

[SecretAgentFan]

I don't think that it was done simply to get everyone's hopes up. Judging from the history of the project, this was probably the closest it's ever come to actually happening. It seems like everyone other than Bill Murray is on board for this. There actually is a completed script that has apparently been approved by most of the people involved, the studio apparently gave it the go ahead, and Reitman was said to be back to direct. This is just my take from reading all of the articles about the film in the last year or so, but it really does seem like there are only a couple of things holding it up at this point.

I get the same impression. It has widely been reported that the script has been sent to Murray but he hasn´t read it yet. He even confirmed it on a talk show (was it Letterman?).

Personally, I think this is pretty bad form by Murray. If he is not interested then he just should say so. But delaying to read this and even making fun of this is just a "powerful actor-idiocy".

And although I love Murray´s work - and he´s clearly the major attraction in the "Ghostbusters"-ensemble - I would urge the studio to move on without him. The whole film won´t be just about the original gang anyway. Beef up Ayckroyd´s role - or get Chevy Chase in there.

[elizabeth]

I have a certain level of fondness for it, because I watched it a lot as a kid. It does have a pretty decent plot, and Vigo and whatever Peter McNicholl's character is called make good villians.

Dr. Janosz Poha.

And I loved the second film. I loved both of them (*cough* once I grew a spine and was able to sit through the movies without getting scared *cough*). As for a 3rd film, it's IMDB, so of course it's lying, but one can only hope.

[iBond]

I don't think that it was done simply to get everyone's hopes up. Judging from the history of the project, this was probably the closest it's ever come to actually happening. It seems like everyone other than Bill Murray is on board for this. There actually is a completed script that has apparently been approved by most of the people involved, the studio apparently gave it the go ahead, and Reitman was said to be back to direct. This is just my take from reading all of the articles about the film in the last year or so, but it really does seem like there are only a couple of things holding it up at this point.

I get the same impression. It has widely been reported that the script has been sent to Murray but he hasn´t read it yet. He even confirmed it on a talk show (was it Letterman?).

Personally, I think this is pretty bad form by Murray. If he is not interested then he just should say so. But delaying to read this and even making fun of this is just a "powerful actor-idiocy".

And although I love Murray´s work - and he´s clearly the major attraction in the "Ghostbusters"-ensemble - I would urge the studio to move on without him. The whole film won´t be just about the original gang anyway. Beef up Ayckroyd´s role - or get Chevy Chase in there.

Yeah, I'm unclear as to why Murray is delaying so much. I mean, he's just going to get older and older it's not like time stands still. So, even though he is funny and a great addition to the cast, he should at least make a small cameo to make the fans happy. I'm sure people would be pleased to see him as Venkman no matter how long the scene is. I would be! Well...I take that back, I do hope that it's longer than just a cameo hehe! But still. Hah, I remember that small scene in Casper with Dan Akroyd running out of the house saying, "Who ya gonna call? Someone else..." lol That was a funny bit. But yeah, I do hope Murray decides what to do soon. As for the IMDb, he is already confirmed to be in it, and as I said earlier, Weaver mentioned that he might play a ghost or something...I have no idea.

[coco1997]

Ghostbusters 3 in 2013

This appears to be the first legitimate announcement from Sony regarding the release of the third film. However, the phrasing appears to indicate that it will be a reboot rather than a sequel.

[tdalton]

Ghostbusters 3 in 2013

This appears to be the first legitimate announcement from Sony regarding the release of the third film. However, the phrasing appears to indicate that it will be a reboot rather than a sequel.

That phrasing gave me some serious pause as well, but given that the idea in the current script was to have the old crew hand over the reigns to the new crew in the film, it's still possible that they go that direction, as it would be something of a "relaunch". That's what I'm hoping for, as a GB III without at least some of the originals isn't going to excite me one bit, especially if they decide to cast the film with current SNL cast members, as has been discussed quite a bit.

[coco1997]

given that the idea in the current script was to have the old crew hand over the reigns to the new crew in the film, it's still possible that they go that direction, as it would be something of a "relaunch". That's what I'm hoping for, as a GB III without at least some of the originals isn't going to excite me one bit

Good point. Hopefully, if the original cast's roles are only minimal, Bill Murray can be persuaded to finally give in and make an appearance.

[tdalton]

given that the idea in the current script was to have the old crew hand over the reigns to the new crew in the film, it's still possible that they go that direction, as it would be something of a "relaunch". That's what I'm hoping for, as a GB III without at least some of the originals isn't going to excite me one bit

Good point. Hopefully, if the original cast's roles are only minimal, Bill Murray can be persuaded to finally give in and make an appearance.

That's at least the hope I'm going to cling to.

I really don't have much interest in a GB III without the original crew, no matter how old they've gotten since GB II. I could deal with them not even including Murray as long as they're able to get Aykroyd, Ramos, and Hudson back, which it sounds like all three are willing to come back. I might be able to get some excitement going for it if they cast the new recruits well, but I have my doubts regarding the studio's ability to pull that off.

[iBond]

Hey, if they never get around to making a film, they should at least do a Ghostbusters Christmas Reunion.

[SecretAgentFan]

If they re-boot it with younger actors I hope it won´t be with twenty-somethings.

But I definitely would watch a "Ghostbusters" with Steve Carell, Will Ferrell and Chris Rock.

[Righty007]

We already have a thread on this: Ghostbusters III

[iBond]

We already have a thread on this: Ghostbusters III

Well, it was from some time ago. And I wasn't going to search that far back. But thanks for the heads up.

[Righty007]

We already have a thread on this: Ghostbusters III

Well, it was from some time ago. And I wasn't going to search that far back. But thanks for the heads up.

Are you serious? Is late-2010 really "some time ago"? I've been here since 2003. Now that's some time ago.

[Matt_13]

If it's a reboot with the original cast still in the film, servings as mentors that'll be totally fine by me. If it's a sort of start from scratch approach, I don't think I could appropriately verbalize my disdain.

[iBond]

We already have a thread on this: Ghostbusters III

Well, it was from some time ago. And I wasn't going to search that far back. But thanks for the heads up.

Are you serious? Is late-2010 really "some time ago"? I've been here since 2003. Now that's some time ago.

Hahaha! How time flies...

[JimmyBond]

It is good message board etiquette to search out threads on subjects you are interested in discussing. It keeps the clutter down that way.

[elizabeth]

But I definitely would watch a "Ghostbusters" with Steve Carell, Will Ferrell and Chris Rock.

Never thought I'd be saying this, but I probably would too.

[iBond]

Ghostbusters 3 in 2013

This appears to be the first legitimate announcement from Sony regarding the release of the third film. However, the phrasing appears to indicate that it will be a reboot rather than a sequel.

If that's the case, why make it "3"? They might as well just call it Ghostbusters, or The Ghostbusters. Who knows. Yeah, I'm starting to figure that it's not going to happen afterall. I mean, people did say the same thing about Indiana Jones 4 and how it was unlikely that it would ever happen, so who knows...but at this rate, I doubt it.

[00 Brosnan]

GBIII could have been released a decade ago if Bill Murray wanted to do it. The project has basically been hung up b/c of him. At this point a reboot is more likely than a GBIII. Murray obviously doesn't want to do it that badly.

[iBond]

But I definitely would watch a "Ghostbusters" with Steve Carell, Will Ferrell and Chris Rock.

Never thought I'd be saying this, but I probably would too.

Hmm...let's just hope the whole thing isn't all one big humor bash. I liked the first two films because they incorporated humor along with suspense.

[The Dove]

If Bill Murray says no and does something like shredding the script and mailing back to Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis...then we KNOW this movie WAS going to be VERY, VERY bad!! I say just do another video game in the spirit (no pun intended..lol!) of the Ghostbusters game that came out in '09..that would more than satisfy me in lieu of trying to put out a crappy 3rd film in which some young, snot-nosed little brats get handed over the Proton Packs..

http://jack.radio.co...sters-3-script/