Well bear in mind the quality of scripts writers write varies greatly. For example, many critics considered Star Trek the best film of the summer so far and Transformers 2 the worst, but they were written by the same guys (personally, I thought they were not far from being about the same level, but that's by the by). Another obvious example is Purvis and Wade writing both Die Another Day and Casino Royale; OK, they had some "help" on the last one, but I don't think their work on it can be dismissed entirely (and they had some "help" on DAD too).
I know we're in a distinct minority on this one, but I didn't mind Year One and I have a friend who actually liked it enough to see it twice! It wasn't great or anything, but it made a decent change from all the rauchy teen or "lovable loser" comedies which generally get high profile releases these days.
True.
Part of my caution on this is to temper my enthusiasm a bit so that, when the film doesn't actually get made, I won't be disappointed. We've been down this road before with GHOSTBUSTERS 3 (although, thankfully, it didn't get made the last time with that awful, awful cast that Akroyd wanted to put together).
On that note, there's such great comedic talent currently working on TV that I don't see any need to go to the "tried and true" comedians that are mega-stars and that are easily recognizable. I can easily come up with ten lesser known actors that I'd rather seen in GHOSTBUSTERS 3 than any of the "big names" (the ten would be: Nathan Fillion, Adam Baldwin, Yvonne Strahovski, Paul Rudd, John Krasinski, Michael C. Hall, Elizabeth Banks, Erik King, Oliver Hudson, and TJ Thyne). I could come up with more than these, but these are 10 TV actors and lesser known movie actors that I would much rather see make up the new Ghostbusters team than any of the big names that are constantly floated around as possibilities.