Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

First review of Quantum Of Solace


97 replies to this topic

#31 Quantumofsolace007

Quantumofsolace007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3488 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:20 PM

no the sun is really mad Sean Connery isn't playing Bond's Dad/lover/M/Main villian


However 2 things

1. Imdb was the first review (have we confirmed or debunked that one?)

2. i don't think the sun saw anything.

#32 kneelbeforezod

kneelbeforezod

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1131 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:20 PM

But regardless of whether the journalist saw the film or didn't, this "review" isn't even worth the paper it's printed on.

Yes it's a pretty ghastly bit of writing.

#33 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:22 PM

I think the Sun always do this with the Bonds and, I daresay, all the other popularist films. Their desire to offer the first reviews is laughable when the results are like this.


Yeah. I still remember their ludicrously glowing "review" of THE PHANTOM MENACE. On the other hand, I seem to recall that their Super Soaraway Sun World Exclusive Review™ of CASINO ROYALE pointed out that it was a very good film marred slightly by overlength, which many of us would agree with.

#34 Marketto007

Marketto007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2487 posts
  • Location:Brasil

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:29 PM

I am sure they didn't see the final film. They just saw a promo-trailer with some longer sequences, not more.


Agreed. I could right a much more complete review, based in all the photographs we've seen, all the Blog Reports, Trailers, TV Spots, Infos, etc...

xxx

#35 kneelbeforezod

kneelbeforezod

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1131 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:31 PM

I am sure they didn't see the final film. They just saw a promo-trailer with some longer sequences, not more.


Agreed. I could right a much more complete review, based in all the photographs we've seen, all the Blog Reports, Trailers, TV Spots, Infos, etc...

xxx

Yes but... the body count. They keep going on about the body count. Is that something we knew? You can't really infer that from the trailers.

#36 oatesy

oatesy

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 223 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:38 PM

I suspect the review is based on some elements of the film, but likely more than just the trailer (did Germanlady not post yesterday that the German JB fanclub were invited to see some extended scenes from QoS earlier this week). Hence the lack of any real opinion on the film as a whole, just comments on the level of violence being up. Presumably some of the action sequences were shown in a more complete format than the trailer - even from trailer the increased violence is fairly evident (Bond stabbing Slate in the neck for instance looked fairly nasty)

Can't believe this is based on a review of the entire film. I doubt the final scoring and sound mixing is complete yet. There is still over a month to go before the premiere

#37 Marketto007

Marketto007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2487 posts
  • Location:Brasil

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:54 PM

I am sure they didn't see the final film. They just saw a promo-trailer with some longer sequences, not more.


Agreed. I could right a much more complete review, based in all the photographs we've seen, all the Blog Reports, Trailers, TV Spots, Infos, etc...

xxx

Yes but... the body count. They keep going on about the body count. Is that something we knew? You can't really infer that from the trailers.


Yes, but you could imagine that, don't you?

Mitchell, Slate, Quantum man (in the car chase), etc, etc, etc...it's obvious.

xxx

#38 kneelbeforezod

kneelbeforezod

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1131 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:58 PM


Yes but... the body count. They keep going on about the body count. Is that something we knew? You can't really infer that from the trailers.


Yes, but you could imagine that, don't you?

Mitchell, Slate, Quantum man (in the car chase), etc, etc, etc...it's obvious.

xxx

Yes, I suppose thats true.
Ok, I shall now officially DISREGARD this review :(

#39 CamExam

CamExam

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 85 posts
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:07 PM

By the sounds of it the Sun forgot to watch CR before they watched QOS. Hmmm......They seemed confused as to who Vesper and Mathis are. Not cool. Bond is more Rambo here????Well at least they didn't mention Bourne..EDIT: They did.

Not encouraging, but it is only one review, lets hold out here.

I knew it wasnt going to be good as CR

#40 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:09 PM

I am sure they didn't see the final film. They just saw a promo-trailer with some longer sequences, not more.


Agreed. I could right a much more complete review, based in all the photographs we've seen, all the Blog Reports, Trailers, TV Spots, Infos, etc...

xxx

Yes but... the body count. They keep going on about the body count. Is that something we knew? You can't really infer that from the trailers.



It's a Action/Adventure film. It's obviously going to have a high body count. :(

#41 [dark]

[dark]

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6239 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:16 PM

Posted Image
"It will kick the living daylights out of any rival action-hero franchises."


#42 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:21 PM

It's a Action/Adventure film. There is obviously going to have a high body count. :(

Yep, and with one of the best James Bond actors ever to grace the screen meting it out. Nothing better than seeing Bond do what he does best.

#43 Ace Roberts

Ace Roberts

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 433 posts
  • Location:Ft. Worth, Texas US

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:27 PM

There are several references to the reviewer being confused about Vesper and Mathis - I don't read that at all - he clearly (and I'm paraphrasing) indicates that this film (QoS) does not dwell on past characters and assumes the viewer has seen Casino Royale and know who they are. I do not read anything in the review to indicate the reviewer is confused.

#44 British Chap

British Chap

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 263 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:30 PM

There are several references to the reviewer being confused about Vesper and Mathis - I don't read that at all - he clearly (and I'm paraphrasing) indicates that this film (QoS) does not dwell on past characters and assumes the viewer has seen Casino Royale and know who they are. I do not read anything in the review to indicate the reviewer is confused.


I agree. After all, he says Mathis is Bond's Friend turned enemy turned what? He knows who Mathis is. He is merely explainign that it is not dwelled on nor explained. The producers assume you have seen Casino Royale.

#45 The ides of Mark

The ides of Mark

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 175 posts
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:34 PM

Nah, nothing new here... I think the IMDB-review IS the real thing.

#46 Jeff007

Jeff007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2076 posts
  • Location:Afghanistan

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:36 PM

Great news!

#47 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:38 PM

Nah, nothing new here... I think the IMDB-review IS the real thing.


I think both are legit. Eon would sue The Suns :( if it posted a false review.

#48 Judo chop

Judo chop

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7461 posts
  • Location:the bottle to the belly!

Posted 25 September 2008 - 03:40 PM

That 'review' was about as helpful as Kara Milvoy.

#49 Stainless Steel Teeth INC

Stainless Steel Teeth INC

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 145 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:03 PM

I think EON would most definitely go after the Sun newspaper had they posted a negative review without having seen the movie but it comes across as being positive which is all good at the end of the day as it contributes towards the 'buzz.'

But as others have said this reads as being a quick cut & paste review without any real substance which leads me to think they have not seen the final cut. They don't really pick out and comment on any key scenes from the movie other than what has already been seen and talked about from trailers or clips.

I just think the Sun wanted the kudos of claiming to be the first newspaper to post a review.

But only a few more tortuous weeks before we start hearing the advance word for real!

#50 The Dove

The Dove

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 16671 posts
  • Location:Colorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:21 PM

Ugh..I hate this review.. sure it sounds great that they enjoyed the movie, but the Sun reviewer is obviously lacking on his Bond facts.. "First time ever the Bond, James Bond line is not used"?? HELLO!! Didn't this person ever see From Russia With Love, Thunderball, You Only Live Twice ect.. Sheesh!! :(

#51 Marketto007

Marketto007

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2487 posts
  • Location:Brasil

Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:31 PM

That 'review' was about as helpful as Kara Milvoy.


HAHA!!! :(

xxx

#52 bondrules

bondrules

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2190 posts
  • Location:America

Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:35 PM

I really despise tabloids....having said that, I don't believe their review is based on having watched the film.

My 2 cents....

Edited by bondrules, 25 September 2008 - 05:08 PM.


#53 Donovan Mayne-Nicholls

Donovan Mayne-Nicholls

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 381 posts
  • Location:Santiago, Chile

Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:50 PM

By the sounds of it the Sun forgot to watch CR before they watched QOS. Hmmm......They seemed confused as to who Vesper and Mathis are. Not cool. Bond is more Rambo here????Well at least they didn't mention Bourne..EDIT: They did.

Not encouraging, but it is only one review, lets hold out here.

I knew it wasnt going to be good as CR


Me too. By now, I've resigned myself to expect another TND. It's a real shame, however, that after all the effort to do something special with Royale, they seem to have done a 180o turn. I'm especially pissed @ Mr Forster, who after first saying how he liked the new approach to Bond, has made a point of changing everything andeveryone.

#54 stamper

stamper

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2994 posts
  • Location:Under the sea

Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:54 PM

I want to believe.

The predominant colour here, though, isn’t environmental green — it’s blood red


BEST. BOND. EVER.

#55 crheath

crheath

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 704 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:55 PM

"First time ever the Bond, James Bond line is not used"?? HELLO!! Didn't this person ever see From Russia With Love, Thunderball, You Only Live Twice ect.. Sheesh!! :(


I was getting ready to post the same reply. When was this guy born? Hasn't he seen all of the movies?

#56 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 September 2008 - 04:59 PM

But regardless of whether the journalist saw the film or didn't, this "review" isn't even worth the paper it's printed on. If you believe that a review should have some interesting things to say, that is.


I'm happy with a review just telling me whether the guy thinks the film is good or not. Obviously I wouldn't buy a magazine full of reviews by this guy, but I wouldn't call it worthless- it's a great bit of marketing at the least, as Jim says.

#57 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 05:09 PM

But regardless of whether the journalist saw the film or didn't, this "review" isn't even worth the paper it's printed on. If you believe that a review should have some interesting things to say, that is.


I'm happy with a review just telling me whether the guy thinks the film is good or not.


Yes. I like them too. Shame this isn't one of them. :(

I actually find it really difficult to see where he's going. He's slamming it one minute, Loving it the other. He even says, and I quote:


The smartass quips and camp gadget-king Q have also been axed.


What the hell does he mean by smartass quips?

The...
"Time to face gravity" kind or the "That last hand; nearly killed me" kind? :)

#58 bondrules

bondrules

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2190 posts
  • Location:America

Posted 25 September 2008 - 05:16 PM

But regardless of whether the journalist saw the film or didn't, this "review" isn't even worth the paper it's printed on. If you believe that a review should have some interesting things to say, that is.


I'm happy with a review just telling me whether the guy thinks the film is good or not.


Yes. I like them too. Shame this isn't one of them. :(

I actually find it really difficult to see where he's going. He's slamming it one minute, Loving it the other. He even says, and I quote:


The smartass quips and camp gadget-king Q have also been axed.


What the hell does he mean by smartass quips?

The...
"Time to face gravity" kind or the "That last hand; nearly killed me" kind? :)


"That last hand; nearly killed me" = Best line in CR (words & masterful delivery)

Edited by bondrules, 25 September 2008 - 05:16 PM.


#59 JimmyBond

JimmyBond

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10559 posts
  • Location:Washington

Posted 25 September 2008 - 05:37 PM

By the sounds of it the Sun forgot to watch CR before they watched QOS. Hmmm......They seemed confused as to who Vesper and Mathis are. Not cool. Bond is more Rambo here????Well at least they didn't mention Bourne..EDIT: They did.

Not encouraging, but it is only one review, lets hold out here.

I knew it wasnt going to be good as CR


I bought a lottery ticket, can you tell me if I'm going to win? Since you seem to be clairvoyant.

#60 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 05:44 PM

"we follow his journey from his promotion to 007 agent (one kill needed)"

:(