Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

First review of Quantum Of Solace


97 replies to this topic

#1 oatesy

oatesy

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 223 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:24 AM

Posted Image
"It will kick the living daylights out of any rival action-hero franchises."


The Sun has posted a preliminary review of QoS. Some spoilers.


EIGHT months after the name of the 22nd James Bond film was announced, The Sneak was still struggling to remember it.

The limp Quantum Of Solace just wouldn’t stick.

But all that changed after I went undercover to infiltrate a top-secret screening of the new 007 flick.

Daniel Craig’s second outing as the world’s most famous secret agent is something you won’t forget in a hurry.

The actor transformed suave Bond into a gritty killing machine in 2006 hit Casino Royale and here the violence is ramped up to Rambo proportions.

More appropriate titles might have been A View To A Killing Spree or Triggerfinger.

The Sneak would like to give you a figure on the body count . . . but it was impossible to keep score.

The film kicks off with Bond in the car chase of his life as his Aston Martin DB9 is pursued through the narrow cliff-top lanes of the Italian Lakes.

A Bourne Ultimatum-style rooftop chase follows, with the famous Palio Horse Race as a stunning backdrop.

The stunts look dangerous for good reason — they are.

Chase
One driver is still recovering from head injuries after crashing into a wall filming the cliff-top chase.

Another had a narrow escape after skidding off a cliff into a lake.

And Craig needed eight stitches in his face after a fight scene and he had the top of a finger sliced off.

It’s a miracle anyone survived filming long enough for Bond to kill them in the movie.

Solace is the first 007 sequel, it picks up directly from where Casino Royale left off.

Bond is out to get revenge for the death of his lover Vesper Lynd (Eva Green) at any cost.

But his path of destruction leads him to the discovery of a new threat to the world, crime syndicate Quantum.

With spies everywhere, even within MI6, they pose an even greater danger than his old arch foes at SPECTRE.

Quantum’s mastermind is billionaire environmentalist Dominic Greene (French actor Mathieu Amalric), who uses a campaign to save swathes of rainforest as a cover for his evil plan.

As Bond battles his new enemies we follow his journey from his promotion to 007 agent (one kill needed) in the last film to First Blood-style rampages.

However, newcomers may be confused by references to old characters and plot lines.

Vesper’s hold on Bond is not fully explained, nor is the return of Mathis (Giancarlo Giannini), Bond’s friend turned foe turned who knows?

Bond’s long list of enemies also gets complicated.

He is so reckless in his blood lust that the CIA agree to kill him when he threatens their dealings with a South American government.

One spymaster quips: “If we refused to do business with villains, we would have no one left.”

Meanwhile, 007’s boss M (Judi Dench) says: “Bond, if you could avoid killing every lead there is, that would be appreciated.”

He dryly replies, “I will do my best” then heads off in designer suits to slay some more.

Things get so bad that M revokes his licence to kill.

Some might say Craig’s portrayal of the spy as an increasingly cold, emotionless character is a brave move. In The Sneak’s opinion, the old-style Bonds of Connery, Moore and Brosnan are too tame for 21st-century tastes.

Here the notches on his gun far outnumber the notches on his bedpost. Only once — sorry, girls — do we see Craig with his top off.

There are two sexy Bond girls in the curvy shapes of Camille (Olga Kurylenko) and MI6 agent Fields (Gemma Arterton).

But the only flash of flesh in the 105-minute movie is a very quick nookie scene with Fields.

The smartass quips and camp gadget-king Q have also been axed. And for the first time the immortal line “The name’s Bond, James Bond” is not used.

Topical environmental references abound, with baddies manipulating fears over climate change.

Though Bond’s carbon footprint would make Greenpeace activists cry. He goes from the UK to Italy to Bolivia to Austria, back to Italy, across to Haiti and finally to Russia.

The predominant colour here, though, isn’t environmental green — it’s blood red.

Which is a surprise since new 007 director Marc Forster is better known for more thoughtful films such as The Kite Runner and Finding Neverland.

Here Forster has followed the standard sequel route of blowing up bigger stuff.

Our hero writes off a fleet of cars, blows up a helicopter and military jetfighter, destroys a cargo plane and several boats and, well . . . you get the idea.

So this film is not as ground-breaking as Casino Royale.

But it will kick the living daylights out of any rival action-hero franchises.

Quantum Of Solace opens on October 31

http://www.thesun.co...icle1730883.ece

#2 Pierce - Daniel

Pierce - Daniel

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 719 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:33 AM

By the sounds of it the Sun forgot to watch CR before they watched QOS. Hmmm......They seemed confused as to who Vesper and Mathis are. Not cool. Bond is more Rambo here????Well at least they didn't mention Bourne..EDIT: They did.

Not encouraging, but it is only one review, lets hold out here.

#3 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:35 AM

Sounds great.

Of course, the inevitable backlash against more action and "Rambo"esque action is coming (typical, they never make a distinction between "Rambo" and "First Blood"; when it´s "First Blood"-like action, I can only applaud since in that one Rambo just fought back, trying to stay alive, instead of just mowing down people).

And the novelty of Craig´s Bond is fading.

In the end, this is a positive review and it states that Bond is better than his franchise-rivals again. High-five!

#4 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 09:50 AM

Sounds excellent. It is just what I wanted, a violent tightly wound romp. Fasten your seat belt, this is going to be good.

#5 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:06 AM

By the sounds of it the Sun forgot to watch CR before they watched QOS. Hmmm......They seemed confused as to who Vesper and Mathis are. Not cool. Bond is more Rambo here????Well at least they didn't mention Bourne..EDIT: They did.

Not encouraging, but it is only one review, lets hold out here.

They also apparently forgot to watch the other twenty films: Bond did not utter Those Immortal Words on three occasions during the Age of Connery, yet this review claims it's the first time in the series' history that he doesn't. Likewise, they suggest the rooftop chase owes a lot to The Bourne Ultimatum, even though Bourne copied Bond down to the location in that film. Ironically enough, it's in the same Bond flm they seemed more concerned with making "clever" references to, and since it's The Sun, they're probably still bitter that Winehouse didn't get the title gig despite their attempts at getting the job for her and so probably have it in fo her.

I'll wait until Roger Ebert gets his hands on it for a fair appraial.

#6 Simon

Simon

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5884 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:15 AM

I doubt this is a review.

There is nothing here that is not already known through trailers and past reports.

It has been thoroughly made (spewed) up.

#7 Gernot

Gernot

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 95 posts
  • Location:Vienna, Austria

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:18 AM

I am sure they didn't see the final film. They just saw a promo-trailer with some longer sequences, not more.

#8 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:28 AM

By the sounds of it the Sun forgot to watch CR before they watched QOS. Hmmm......They seemed confused as to who Vesper and Mathis are. Not cool. Bond is more Rambo here????Well at least they didn't mention Bourne..EDIT: They did.

Not encouraging, but it is only one review, lets hold out here.


This review says absolutely nothing about the film. Typical tabloid treading water.

#9 Sir James Moloney

Sir James Moloney

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 332 posts
  • Location:Somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:28 AM

well...it´s the sun :( but it sounds good :)

#10 PPK_19

PPK_19

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1312 posts
  • Location:Surrey, England.

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:48 AM

I agree, this is not a review. I could have written the same after watching the theatrical trailer. Lets wait till Empire's official review eh?

#11 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:52 AM

I see no reason to think that this isn't a real review: it all sounds good to me.

they're probably still bitter that Winehouse didn't get the title gig despite their attempts at getting the job for her


She did get the job; David Arnold confirmed that he was working with Ronson and Winehouse; it just fell through.

#12 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:53 AM

A Bourne Ultimatum-style rooftop chase follows,


Is that the Bourne Ultimatum rooftop chase that was first done in The Living Daylights? :) :(

#13 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 September 2008 - 10:59 AM

A Bourne Ultimatum-style rooftop chase follows,


Is that the Bourne Ultimatum rooftop chase that was first done in The Living Daylights? :) :(


Ultimatum actually made it exciting and pacey, though, didn't it? If the TLD one was anywhere near as memorable he'd have mentioned it. And if Daylights had the first ever rooftop chase in film, I'll eat my car. Even 'Vertigo' has a rooftop chase.
From what I've seen of the chase in the trailer, Ultimatum seems a very good comparison.

You don't always have to be so protective of Bond; it didn't always do everything first or better.

#14 Skudor

Skudor

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9286 posts
  • Location:Buckinghamshire

Posted 25 September 2008 - 11:05 AM

I feel dirty.

Just reading this crap.

That the sun wrote.

Or rather it's inept reporter.

I'm going to throw up now.

Now I'm going to throw up.

God I hate The Sun.

#15 Elvenstar

Elvenstar

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 294 posts
  • Location:nowhere

Posted 25 September 2008 - 11:59 AM

I believe this review but refuse to understand why they send such non proffessional people.
1st he calls CR groundbreaking then confused by links to Vesper and Mathis. Strange.
Overall it confirmed my fears about all-action film but it will be beautifully shot and tense at least. I don't think the critics' opinion will matter that much to me when the film's released. Especially taking into account that I usually don't like critic's darlings like dark Knight.

#16 Zorin Industries

Zorin Industries

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5634 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 12:05 PM

I feel dirty.

Just reading this crap.

That the sun wrote.

Or rather it's inept reporter.

I'm going to throw up now.

Now I'm going to throw up.

God I hate The Sun.

It's not as bad as the Mail. At least there is a slight optimism to The Sun - which sells by the bucket load. The Mail though is a hateful, :( stirring rag under the pretence of being something more than that. At least The Sun knows it is what it is.

#17 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 25 September 2008 - 12:12 PM

It's not as bad as the Mail. At least there is a slight optimism to The Sun - which sells by the bucket load. The Mail though is a hateful, :( stirring rag under the pretence of being something more than that.


Whilst I heartily endorse the sentiment, the sentiment is exactly the sort of thing the Mail would say - it's all a trap.

Better to ignore it and hope it all goes away.

As to the review - even if a cut 'n' paste job from sites like this rather than a genuine "review" (although I suspect it is a carefully guarded, Eon-approved, PR statement masquerading as news and the writer has indeed seen the film), the vast, vast, vast majority of Sun readers would never come to a site like this so it's early information for most people on what the new Bond film is going to be like.

#18 DamnCoffee

DamnCoffee

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 24459 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 12:21 PM

I dunno what to think of this review. The film certainly sounds very good indeed. But I'm quite confused by the actual wording of the article. Is the review good or bad? :(

#19 Captain Tightpants

Captain Tightpants

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4755 posts
  • Location::noitacoL

Posted 25 September 2008 - 12:37 PM

they're probably still bitter that Winehouse didn't get the title gig despite their attempts at getting the job for her


She did get the job; David Arnold confirmed that he was working with Ronson and Winehouse; it just fell through.

Well, then, she lost it of her own stupid fault.

#20 double o ego

double o ego

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1261 posts
  • Location:London, England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 12:43 PM

HAHA! I'm not reading that.

#21 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 September 2008 - 01:13 PM

they're probably still bitter that Winehouse didn't get the title gig despite their attempts at getting the job for her


She did get the job; David Arnold confirmed that he was working with Ronson and Winehouse; it just fell through.

Well, then, she lost it of her own stupid fault.



What's that got to do with The Sun?

#22 Germanlady

Germanlady

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1381 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 25 September 2008 - 01:34 PM

So the Sun reviewed it as an action film and gave it 5 stars IMO - since we cannot expect a tabloid to give a really fair review, I think they chose to ignore (if they have indeed seen the whole film and not just parts - the action parts - all the other ingrediences that we know by now are in it. So my guess - Great acting (since we have Graig and Almaric) PLUS great action.

#23 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 25 September 2008 - 01:37 PM

I dunno what to think of this review. The film certainly sounds very good indeed. But I'm quite confused by the actual wording of the article. Is the review good or bad? :(


I guess the reviewer had lots of fun but wanted to disguise this - as so many reviewers do. So he grabbed into his toolbag and brought the modern reviewer´s action film comparisons:

- Bond copies Bourne

- Shooting bad guys means Rambo

Also, this reviewer was clearly not familiar with Bond and probably saw CR only once without really paying attention (I know some famous critics who actually sleep during press screenings or attend them after 30 minutes). Therefore he did not remember Vesper or Mathis. Although this is so easy to understand: Vesper = dead girlfriend who betrayed Bond; Mathis = assistant who maybe betrayed Bond. Why is this so hard to get?

In the end - it is a positive review. Most people who read this in order to make up their mind will want to see the action.

#24 Simon

Simon

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5884 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 01:44 PM

I see no reason to think that this isn't a real review: it all sounds good to me.

Indeed. As a review of the trailer, it's hot to trot.

I think the Sun always do this with the Bonds and, I daresay, all the other popularist films. Their desire to offer the first reviews is laughable when the results are like this.

#25 tristanjblythe

tristanjblythe

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 87 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 September 2008 - 01:51 PM

This adds nothing to what we already now. But hey perhaps part of the deal of "sneaking" in to see the film was that they couldn't give any more away yet (although I admit I doubt it!)

#26 solace

solace

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 284 posts
  • Location:North of England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 01:53 PM

I think that from the sounds of it Bond is left a cold, ruthless killing machine after the events of CR. I reckon the film will be about the pointlessness of revenge. That you can never kill enough, Blow enough up to change things. Bond will start out killing everybody and come through the other side, a more thoughtfull, carefull person. maybe this will be the kind of film which should have followed OHMSS. What do you all think?

#27 Eddie Burns

Eddie Burns

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 232 posts
  • Location:Somewhere on Planet Earth

Posted 25 September 2008 - 01:54 PM

Typical Sun review for the typical Sun reader. It basically tells you what the average movie-goer needs to know about QoS. Its only us fans that sweat the details. At least it is positive.

However, I'm not fond of the Rambo description, because that initially was my fear...that this movie is just action with bits of acting.

Anybody have a review of what they said about Bourne Ultimatum/TDK etc.? it might help put things in perspective.

#28 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:16 PM

I see no reason to think that this isn't a real review: it all sounds good to me.

Indeed. As a review of the trailer, it's hot to trot.


Does M ask Bond not to kill every lead in the trailer? I don't remember that. Nor the CIA being sent to kill Bond.

#29 kneelbeforezod

kneelbeforezod

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1131 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:16 PM

well... its not the most inspiring review. I really loved the quiet moments in CR. There was a comment by Forster I think that CR had "more reflective moments". And now comes this review with Rambo references and talk of Forster going "the standard sequel route of blowing up bigger stuff".

I'm a teeny bit concerned now. Just a teeny bit.

#30 Loomis

Loomis

    Commander CMG

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 21862 posts

Posted 25 September 2008 - 02:18 PM

I see no reason to think that this isn't a real review: it all sounds good to me.

Indeed. As a review of the trailer, it's hot to trot.


Does M ask Bond not to kill every lead in the trailer?


It's in one of the TV spots.



Nor the CIA being sent to kill Bond.


This is a new one on me.

But regardless of whether the journalist saw the film or didn't, this "review" isn't even worth the paper it's printed on. If you believe that a review should have some interesting things to say, that is.