Some many beautiful locales in this film. I particularly liked the ones filmed in Rio
Rio looks beautiful and very accessible in this movie.
And am I right in thinking it is a lot more built-up, 30 years on, with more tall buildings??
Posted 14 October 2008 - 01:45 AM
Some many beautiful locales in this film. I particularly liked the ones filmed in Rio
Posted 14 October 2008 - 05:28 AM
Many of the locals looked beautiful and accessible too.Some many beautiful locales in this film. I particularly liked the ones filmed in Rio
Rio looks beautiful and very accessible in this movie.
Posted 21 November 2008 - 12:41 AM
Many of the locals looked beautiful and accessible too.Some many beautiful locales in this film. I particularly liked the ones filmed in Rio
Rio looks beautiful and very accessible in this movie.
Posted 18 February 2010 - 10:33 PM
Posted 19 February 2010 - 02:32 AM
Posted 19 February 2010 - 11:46 AM
Posted 19 February 2010 - 01:48 PM
Posted 21 February 2010 - 09:19 PM
For all the criticism Moonraker gets, I don't think it would take many cuts to have it ranking alongside other Moore films as a good middle of the road entry in the series
1. Cut Jaws flapping his arms in the PTS
2. Cut the Gondola hovercraft and associated shots in the Piazza San Marco
3. Cut Jaws in the airport metal detector
4. Different method of Manuela escaping from Jaws in Rio
5. Cut Dolly
6. Remove "Maginificent 007" music
That's probably only 2-3 minutes of cuts at most, leaving a good 2 hours of material.
OK, the space stuff is a bit daft, but considering that Shuttles do exist and there were genuine space stations at that time (such as SkyLab). Then the only things that jar are the size of station, the whole radar jamming puzzle and the laser guns, which sit quite well alongside Volcano lairs and Atlantis as extreme but acceptable concepts for Bond movies.
YOLT and SPY are usually reasonably well respected (OK, a lot of people dislike YOLT, but I like it)
Posted 21 February 2010 - 09:50 PM
Posted 22 February 2010 - 12:38 AM
As it is, I can't watch Moonraker sober. For reference, I was one of the troops there on opening in 1979 (age 14); I thought it was
then and I think it's
now.
I do wonder how Moonrakar might have played with a truly dark centre, however, and not just with the lip service of the PTS, centrifuge, death of Corinne, and scientists bits. There is simply no threat implicit in Bond's discovery of Drax's plot to destroy humanity. Moore is sadly at his blandest while the end of the world is threatened; he is not dark and brooding over the fate, or super-confident in control, just wooden.
Had the DANGER element of Moonraker been played up with, say, Laz, Dalton or Craig - or Rog in The Man Who Haunted Himself mode - it could have been a classic.
As it is, its awful. DAD and Brosnan is CR and Craig by comparison. Bond at its worst, IMO.
Posted 22 February 2010 - 01:27 PM
Posted 22 February 2010 - 04:14 PM
Posted 22 February 2010 - 06:19 PM
Agreed on the great scenes. Moonraker is grand entertainment, would never dream of giving this film crap. As per list.For all the crap we give it, there are a few great moments in MR. Just to point out my favorites. (Not necessarily in order)
"Such good sport"
The death of Corrine
The Venice locale (Great location, but three times?)
The entire score + Title song
The Rio locale
All of Drax
The visual effects
and most of the cable car fight.
darthbond
Posted 23 February 2010 - 04:48 AM
Posted 23 February 2010 - 04:56 AM
It isn't quite "awful" - reserve that for the 1967 version of Casino Royale - but it isn't the marvellous work of art that so many on this thread have persuaded themselves it is. Right now the story of the emperor's new clothes springs to my mind. You see what you want to see in it.
Posted 23 February 2010 - 09:06 AM
Nobody is claiming it's "a marvelous work of art".
Posted 23 February 2010 - 03:08 PM
Posted 23 February 2010 - 08:05 PM
The dogs killing Corrine. One of the BEST most intense scenes in all Bond history. The music, the use of slow motion, the fact that Bond has exited the scene and the outcome is inevitable... It's a brilliant scene that is Craig-era worthy (the scientists dying with Bond watching through the glass is another similarly disturbing scene).
Sure, Moonraker goes too goofy in certain sections. But it has a rhythm of alternating humor and deadly seriousness that I think is pure BOND. And, yes, the locations are stunning and all real (okay, except for outer space -- but it still looks damn good).
I love Moonraker.
Posted 27 April 2010 - 03:32 AM
The dogs killing Corrine. One of the BEST most intense scenes in all Bond history. The music, the use of slow motion, the fact that Bond has exited the scene and the outcome is inevitable... It's a brilliant scene that is Craig-era worthy (the scientists dying with Bond watching through the glass is another similarly disturbing scene).
Sure, Moonraker goes too goofy in certain sections. But it has a rhythm of alternating humor and deadly seriousness that I think is pure BOND. And, yes, the locations are stunning and all real (okay, except for outer space -- but it still looks damn good).
I love Moonraker.
This is actually my 2nd favourite Rog movie, behind the fabulous Live and let die. I do think that Moonraker's original plot and storyline is far superior in the Novel. But I still love this movie including the scene at the end chasing the Bacterial Bombs.
Posted 28 September 2012 - 04:13 AM
Posted 29 September 2012 - 03:45 PM
Recently watched Moonraker again. It does have some beautiful locations.
-
Posted 29 September 2012 - 04:32 PM
Four years late in replying to this thread unfortunately, but I was in Rio earlier this year so can now comment with some degree of knowledge. There are certainly some areas built up with taller buildings but these are largely grouped together and the iconic views over the city remain largely as they were at the time of MOONRAKER. Extraordinarily beautiful city.Some many beautiful locales in this film. I particularly liked the ones filmed in Rio
Rio looks beautiful and very accessible in this movie.
And am I right in thinking it is a lot more built-up, 30 years on, with more tall buildings??
Posted 02 October 2012 - 02:56 PM
Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:41 PM