Ledger as Bond?
#1
Posted 27 July 2008 - 07:49 PM
As we all know Ledger was a marvolous actor, an extremly good looking actor and rough around the edges. Now I have been wondering this for quite sometime, If Heath Ledger was still with us, could be have been a possible successor to Daniel Craig when he hangs up the PPK? I know he's nor the stereotypical Bond actor, but neither is Craig and from what I have seen from Ledger in The Dark Knight, I'm convinced he could pull off anything. I know he's australian, but so was Lazenby, and he made a brilliant Bond in my book.
So how about it? Heath Ledger as James Bond, would it have worked?
#2
Posted 27 July 2008 - 07:51 PM
So how about it? Heath Ledger as James Bond, would it of worked?
Well, he would have needed a rug pretty soon
#3
Posted 27 July 2008 - 08:23 PM
#4
Posted 27 July 2008 - 08:28 PM
#5
Posted 27 July 2008 - 11:16 PM
#6
Posted 27 July 2008 - 11:40 PM
Chris is correct though - Ledger is (and always will be) the Joker.
#7
Posted 27 July 2008 - 11:41 PM
Brokeback Bond.I can't exactly put my finger upon why that is though.
#8
Posted 27 July 2008 - 11:46 PM
Ah, I see you haven't heard about the camping trip Felix and Bond take in QUANTUM OF SOLACE then?Brokeback Bond.I can't exactly put my finger upon why that is though.
#9
Posted 27 July 2008 - 11:57 PM
I seem to remember thinking then that he wouldn't be right for it.
#10
Posted 28 July 2008 - 12:23 AM
No to Bond but Ledger IS the Joker.
Until the next time a Batman movie features the Joker.
#11
Posted 28 July 2008 - 01:02 AM
We'll see if someone can make us forget Ledger's Joker. Doubtful.Until the next time a Batman movie features the Joker.No to Bond but Ledger IS the Joker.
At any rate, I think he would have made an interesting Bond. He's not a natural choice for me, but I'm not sure he'd have been miscast, either. I'd have to see what he would have done with it before I can judge, and I have an inkling that his talent and natural charisma would have pulled him through just fine.
#12
Posted 28 July 2008 - 04:14 AM
Ah, I see you haven't heard about the camping trip Felix and Bond take in QUANTUM OF SOLACE then?Brokeback Bond.I can't exactly put my finger upon why that is though.
#13
Posted 28 July 2008 - 04:27 AM
Exactly. Sure, the part may be re-cast in the future, but I can't see anyone coming close to what Ledger did. While we can't say what he would have been like as Bond in the off chance he was cast, we can say he owns the role of The Joker.We'll see if someone can make us forget Ledger's Joker. Doubtful.Until the next time a Batman movie features the Joker.No to Bond but Ledger IS the Joker.
#14
Posted 28 July 2008 - 04:41 AM
He owns the role of The Joker.While we can't say what he would have been like as Bond in the off chance he was cast, we can say he owns the role of The Joker.We'll see if someone can make us forget Ledger's Joker. Doubtful.Until the next time a Batman movie features the Joker.No to Bond but Ledger IS the Joker.
#15
Posted 28 July 2008 - 08:46 AM
#16
Posted 28 July 2008 - 11:08 AM
http://us.movies1.yi...r/feathers9.jpg
#17
Posted 28 July 2008 - 11:12 AM
As Harry Faversham, Ledger is basically Charlie Higson's Young Bond, slightly older.
I have not seen Ledger as the Joker. Comic strips have never been my thing. But as Faversham, Ledger does a very good prototype Bond.
#18
Posted 28 July 2008 - 11:29 AM
It's characters are takern from those of a comic book, just as M, Bond, Moneypenny, Felix, Tanner etc. are takern from the Fleming novels not meaning they are based on any books at all.
Ledger isn't being hailed just because he's dead, he really is that good.
#19
Posted 28 July 2008 - 11:32 AM
Ledger isn't being hailed just because he's dead, he really is that good.
I agree. One of the highlights of the movie. Though it is interesting to think if Ledger was still with us, would the Joker be just another character in TDK and would Ledger be hailed less for his portrayal of the character?
#20
Posted 28 July 2008 - 11:53 AM
Consider this - in The Four Feathers, Ledger is essentially a very young, well educated (possibly Eton) man from a background with a certain social status who suddenly has to prove his worth and turns out to be resourceful, brave, ultra-determined, essentially unstoppable.
As Harry Faversham, Ledger is basically Charlie Higson's Young Bond, slightly older.
I have not seen Ledger as the Joker. Comic strips have never been my thing. But as Faversham, Ledger does a very good prototype Bond.
But that Eton portrayal of Bond as seen in the YOUNG BOND books is very far removed from the cinematic Bond and always has been.
#21
Posted 28 July 2008 - 12:10 PM
Consider this - in The Four Feathers, Ledger is essentially a very young, well educated (possibly Eton) man from a background with a certain social status who suddenly has to prove his worth and turns out to be resourceful, brave, ultra-determined, essentially unstoppable.
As Harry Faversham, Ledger is basically Charlie Higson's Young Bond, slightly older.
I have not seen Ledger as the Joker. Comic strips have never been my thing. But as Faversham, Ledger does a very good prototype Bond.
But that Eton portrayal of Bond as seen in the YOUNG BOND books is very far removed from the cinematic Bond and always has been.
Fair comment - that's my literary Bond obsession for you!
However, had EON not gone down the Craig reboot route, I do think Ledger as a younger, period Bond in the vein of Faversham, even playing up the Eton stuff, might have worked.
#22
Posted 28 July 2008 - 02:55 PM
Ledger isn't being hailed just because he's dead, he really is that good.
I agree. One of the highlights of the movie. Though it is interesting to think if Ledger was still with us, would the Joker be just another character in TDK and would Ledger be hailed less for his portrayal of the character?
Interesting question. The answer is yes. Let's talk about the psychology of it.
It was one of his last roles.
He died suddenly. It was a tragic death.
The Joker is, for Batman fans AND non fans, the villain most recognized and most fascinating.
We were told for months how great his performace was.
He was allowed to take the character in a completely new direction, darker than the original Batman movie.
You add all of these up and you have every person in the theater hoping for Ledger to shine, WANTING him to shine. You pay more attention to him in his scenes due to the fact that you know you are watching a dead guy on the screen.
So, I do believe that had he still been with us, he would still be considered a great villain, but the cheers wouldn't have been as powerful.
If Daniel Craig had died right before Casino Royale, how would that have changed YOUR opinion of his already flawless performance?
(Before anyone thinks I am knocking him, I would easily rate his performance an A+)
#23
Posted 28 July 2008 - 03:14 PM
#24
Posted 28 July 2008 - 03:16 PM
Ledger isn't being hailed just because he's dead, he really is that good.
I agree. One of the highlights of the movie. Though it is interesting to think if Ledger was still with us, would the Joker be just another character in TDK and would Ledger be hailed less for his portrayal of the character?
You pay more attention to him in his scenes due to the fact that you know you are watching a dead guy on the screen.
Really? I'd like to think audiences are a bit more intelligent than that.
Whilst I haven't seen THE DARK KNIGHT just yet (and will do), I don't think Heath Ledger is the first actor to die before a last film role was released. I watched him in the superb CANDY last night. I didn't watch it thinking he had died. I just watched it thinking he was a great actor.
I feel there is a bit of mawkish rubber-necking going on with THE DARK KNIGHT, but Ledger himself would have been the first to laugh at that and not give a toss.
#25
Posted 28 July 2008 - 03:22 PM
Some fans' thinking seems to be: well, they were able to polish up Craig into Bond, so they can do it with just about anyone. Overlooking the fact that Craig did look the part to begin with. More or less.
#26
Posted 28 July 2008 - 03:31 PM
#27
Posted 28 July 2008 - 03:32 PM
Some fans' thinking seems to be: well, they were able to polish up Craig into Bond, so they can do it with just about anyone. Overlooking the fact that Craig did look the part to begin with. More or less.
And if he wears a tuxedo in anything else then he most definitely will be Bond. It's the Clive Owen syndrome and really demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of why some actors can be Bond and some can't. I find it quite baffling coming from people who know every detail about every film, but can't see the word for their nostalgic trees when wishing good actors were involved in Bond and not just Roger Moore clones.
#28
Posted 28 July 2008 - 04:20 PM
Entirely agreed.I don't think a lesson of the Craig era is that simply anyone can be Bond just so long as he happens to be a brilliant actor.... for the simple reason that I think Craig does (apart from the notorious hair colour issue, of course) look like Fleming's 007 anyway, what with an athletic physique, good looks offset by a "cruel mouth", and piercing eyes.
Some fans' thinking seems to be: well, they were able to polish up Craig into Bond, so they can do it with just about anyone. Overlooking the fact that Craig did look the part to begin with. More or less.
#29
Posted 28 July 2008 - 04:41 PM
#30
Posted 28 July 2008 - 08:08 PM
Edited by honour, 28 July 2008 - 08:09 PM.