
Blinded by Inconsolable Rage
#1
Posted 08 July 2008 - 09:10 AM
#2
Posted 08 July 2008 - 09:19 AM
What exactly does this mean, is Bond angry that he was deceived by Vesper or the fact that she was driven to suicide? Or is it both?
I'm guessing he's angry because Vesper was forced to deceive him and was driven to suicide by Mr White et al.
#3
Posted 08 July 2008 - 12:25 PM
#4
Posted 08 July 2008 - 12:41 PM
#5
Posted 08 July 2008 - 12:53 PM
It's just the moaning M saying he's angry in a convoluted, fancy sentence.
That too

#6
Posted 08 July 2008 - 01:58 PM
#7
Posted 08 July 2008 - 03:52 PM
Edited by aris007, 08 July 2008 - 03:53 PM.
#8
Posted 08 July 2008 - 06:05 PM
Anyway, referring to the original post, I think it's a combination of being angry both over Vesper's betrayal and over the fact that she was basically forced into that situation. Also, I think he's still so bitter over the affair that he wonders if she ever really loved him as much as he loved her. In any case, he holds Quantum responsible, as did the literary Bond with SMERSH, and he's out to crush them.
I'm pretty jazzed about it, myself.

#9
Posted 08 July 2008 - 06:08 PM
What exactly does this mean, is Bond angry that he was deceived by Vesper or the fact that she was driven to suicide? Or is it both?
"Why a little bit of both I suppose"
#10
Posted 08 July 2008 - 06:09 PM
No, I don't think Bond really would have killed Vesper. As 00Twelve says, I think the "allow me" comment was just a fit of rage. In the greater scheme of CASINO ROYALE, I think Bond would have been able to see the "bigger picture", and brought Vesper in for questioning had he had the opportunity.I think that he's angry, because he was deceived by Vesper. I don't think that he gave a damn about her death. Besides he would have killed her if she hadn't suicided! Am I right?
#11
Posted 08 July 2008 - 06:14 PM
No, I don't think Bond really would have killed Vesper. As 00Twelve says, I think the "allow me" comment was just a fit of rage.
Yeah, It's just an expression. Like If I say "If you dont turn up, I'll kill ya"... It wont mean i'll actually kill you if you didn't turn up, It will just mean that I will be really angry. So basically, Bond is saying that he is really, really, REALLY angry with Vespers betrayal.

#12
Posted 08 July 2008 - 07:36 PM
That "rage" sentence to me means that he is now defined a loose cannon to the Service, as we will get to see. M then tries to restrict his movements because of this uncontrolled "rage".
Maybe by the end of the flick, we'll see him in the "acceptance" mode (or not which might propel the third film).
Usual stuff.
EDIT: or is that grief, anger then acceptance?

Edited by danslittlefinger, 08 July 2008 - 07:59 PM.
#13
Posted 10 July 2008 - 03:46 PM
No, I don't think Bond really would have killed Vesper. As 00Twelve says, I think the "allow me" comment was just a fit of rage.
Yeah, It's just an expression. Like If I say "If you dont turn up, I'll kill ya"... It wont mean i'll actually kill you if you didn't turn up, It will just mean that I will be really angry. So basically, Bond is saying that he is really, really, REALLY angry with Vespers betrayal.
Got the meaning! Thanks for enlightining me!

#14
Posted 10 July 2008 - 04:45 PM
That clunky "blinded by inconsolable rage" line is pretty awful, too. Nobody (with the possible exception of Brian Sewell) speaks like that. They would have been better off changing it to something that sounds like it might've actually come out of somebody's mouth.
#15
Posted 10 July 2008 - 05:04 PM
#16
Posted 10 July 2008 - 05:21 PM
It feels like Dench's M since Goldeneye, take 1. Nothing new there.I would have cut the word "inconsolable." Makes the sentence unwieldy and artificial. Feels "written."
#17
Posted 10 July 2008 - 06:38 PM
#18
Posted 10 July 2008 - 07:00 PM
I can imagine M looking through her thesaurus between briefings so she can hit Bond with another presumptuous sounding word or phrase.
More like M giving Bond a trashing, and then Bond looking it up to see what she meant.

#19
Posted 10 July 2008 - 07:06 PM
"Paroxysm beyond the hope of palliation has rendered you so optically feckless, you remain yet unacquainted with those in whom who can consign!!!"I can imagine M looking through her thesaurus between briefings so she can hit Bond with another presumptuous sounding word or phrase.
More like M giving Bond a trashing, and then Bond looking it up to see what she meant.
(I hope somebody enjoys that. It took me a good 10 minutes to come up with it.

#20
Posted 10 July 2008 - 07:56 PM
"Paroxysm beyond the hope of palliation has rendered you so optically feckless, you remain yet unacquainted with those in whom who can consign!!!"I can imagine M looking through her thesaurus between briefings so she can hit Bond with another presumptuous sounding word or phrase.
More like M giving Bond a trashing, and then Bond looking it up to see what she meant.
(I hope somebody enjoys that. It took me a good 10 minutes to come up with it.)
I'm enjoying it - the thought of M saying that is hilarious. Most probably because its kind of... feasible

#21
Posted 10 July 2008 - 08:52 PM
#22
Posted 10 July 2008 - 11:50 PM
#23
Posted 11 July 2008 - 08:13 AM
#24
Posted 11 July 2008 - 12:42 PM
"Paroxysm beyond the hope of palliation has rendered you so optically feckless, you remain yet unacquainted with those in whom who can consign!!!"I can imagine M looking through her thesaurus between briefings so she can hit Bond with another presumptuous sounding word or phrase.
More like M giving Bond a trashing, and then Bond looking it up to see what she meant.
biggrin.gif
(I hope somebody enjoys that. It took me a good 10 minutes to come up with it. smile.gif )
OMG... I can actually imagine her saying that!


#25
Posted 11 July 2008 - 03:09 PM
Perhaps we should always pander to the common denominator.
Meow!
#26
Posted 11 July 2008 - 03:32 PM
#27
Posted 12 July 2008 - 01:08 AM
I would have cut the word "inconsolable." Makes the sentence unwieldy and artificial. Feels "written."
Completely agreed. The word doesn't feel particularly natural when it's used the way that it's used in the trailer. The line would have been much better without it.
#28
Posted 12 July 2008 - 04:16 AM
Hmmmm...

#29
Posted 15 July 2008 - 02:26 PM
"Paroxysm beyond the hope of palliation has rendered you so optically feckless, you remain yet unacquainted with those in whom who can consign!!!"

You should write all M's materials. When M finds his balls again, he should be even more cryptic than this current rendition of M.
Sir I salute you, and I will write to EON productions, so they shall hire you.
#30
Posted 15 July 2008 - 02:59 PM
Could You've Stripped Me of My Armor Haggis conceivably have come up with such tripe?