Wanted (2008)
#1
Posted 27 June 2008 - 08:26 PM
I was also struck by how many young women came to the screening (alone, in groups, and with dates). For an mega action movie, you expect the men to outnumber the women. Not so last night.
I think it could be a big hit.
#2
Posted 27 June 2008 - 10:25 PM
There was this weird credit in the end titles. They had to ask 20th Century Fox's permission in order to name a character Fox. I haven't seen a character that ridiculous since Harlan Ellison's added credit to The Terminator.
#3
Posted 27 June 2008 - 10:32 PM
#4
Posted 27 June 2008 - 11:45 PM
#5
Posted 28 June 2008 - 01:45 AM
#6
Posted 28 June 2008 - 02:16 AM
As I was opening this thread I received a Feedreader popup linking to a review of this movie at Cinematical.
Sounds really interesting.
#7
Posted 28 June 2008 - 02:25 AM
That's one of the changes from the mini-series.I had no problem with the ending. I liked it. Especially...
Spoiler
#8
Posted 28 June 2008 - 09:04 AM
#9
Posted 28 June 2008 - 09:06 AM
Saw a screening of WANTED last night. It was pretty damn good! Of all the summer movies I've seen so far, I think it's actually my favorite. Audience loved it. Not only did they applaud at the end, but they started rhythmically clapping to the end credit music. Never experienced anything like that, but the movie just had the audience in a groove that didn't let up.
I was also struck by how many young women came to the screening (alone, in groups, and with dates). For an mega action movie, you expect the men to outnumber the women. Not so last night.
I think it could be a big hit.
I agree - saw it with the boys and me liked it a lot. Had never heard of the comic book,
Good, unpretentious fun - no evident "themes" and I was in the mood for something incredibly shallow. Yum.
#10
Posted 28 June 2008 - 10:34 AM
I am going to see Hancock though. Just for the QoS trailer.
#11
Posted 28 June 2008 - 03:12 PM
FYI: One of the reasons that the movie differs so much from the comics is that the screenwriters started writing the movie when only the first issue of the comic had been released. They were forced by necessity to extrapolate where the story would go while purposely NOT going to the insane lengths the comic went too.
#12
Posted 28 June 2008 - 04:09 PM
#13
Posted 28 June 2008 - 04:36 PM
#14
Posted 28 June 2008 - 05:16 PM
#15
Posted 28 June 2008 - 05:46 PM
I saw the trailer and thought it looked like run-of-the-mill mindless CGI-stuffed action junk, but since y'all are being so sweet about it I might just give it a go on DVD.
My thoughts exactly. These days I guess I just assume anything with Angelina Jolie will be mediocre at best.
#16
Posted 28 June 2008 - 09:10 PM
#17
Posted 28 June 2008 - 10:39 PM
That's just stupid. Wait for Millar to finish writing the whole thing, then go from there. Why the rush when so much time has passed between the end of the mini series and the release of the film?FYI: One of the reasons that the movie differs so much from the comics is that the screenwriters started writing the movie when only the first issue of the comic had been released. They were forced by necessity to extrapolate where the story would go while purposely NOT going to the insane lengths the comic went too.
#18
Posted 29 June 2008 - 05:30 AM
#19
Posted 29 June 2008 - 09:39 AM
I saw the trailer and thought it looked like run-of-the-mill mindless CGI-stuffed action junk, but since y'all are being so sweet about it I might just give it a go on DVD.
When the mood hits to to watch some unashamed godawful rubbish, you'll see it. It is absent themes. It is absent logic. It is absent introspection. It is absent significant character arcs or whatever else is required of comic book heroes these days. As a result it glories in what it is - bloody awful and it knows it. Fab.
#20
Posted 29 June 2008 - 06:47 PM
That's quite ironic considering that, in the mini series, it was the supervillains who were the leads. They beat the heroes.It is absent significant character arcs or whatever else is required of comic book heroes these days.
#21
Posted 29 June 2008 - 11:50 PM
I think it could be a big hit.
Looks like its opening weekend set a record for an R-rated June movie.
#22
Posted 30 June 2008 - 01:13 AM
Wow, the second half of that sentence makes the first half as meaningless as a player's batting average over a five game span.set a record for an R-rated June movie.
#23
Posted 30 June 2008 - 02:02 AM
Wow, the second half of that sentence makes the first half as meaningless as a player's batting average over a five game span.set a record for an R-rated June movie.
It's a stretch as far as movie records go (as well as how much one actually cares about such things), but nonetheless: http://www.superhero...ews.php?id=7413
#24
Posted 04 July 2008 - 02:36 PM
I missed it the first time around, because the frantic camerawork covered it up--we never get to see La Jolie for more than a second or so at a time...and never below the elbows, when she's wearing the sleeveless white dress. There'd been tabloid stories, a while back, about her alarming wait loss.
At the time of the film, at least, that may well be true. She looks more than wraith-like and frail--she looks positively anorexic. And if I'm right, they must've used a nude stunt double for the steamroom booty shot.
McAvoy, in contrast, is shown stripped to the waist for 2-3 seconds a couple of times.
What are your takes on this?
#25
Posted 04 July 2008 - 03:00 PM
Good, unpretentious fun - no evident "themes" and I was in the mood for something incredibly shallow. Yum.
Totally agree - this is what I also liked about it. I found that I and the group I was with seemed to be the only ones laughing at the silliness though.
#26
Posted 09 July 2008 - 11:42 PM
Yeah, lots of unashamed laughing when I saw it this evening too. Generally, just good fun. It also served the dual purpose of convincing me that James McAvoy could never be Bond!Totally agree - this is what I also liked about it. I found that I and the group I was with seemed to be the only ones laughing at the silliness though.Good, unpretentious fun - no evident "themes" and I was in the mood for something incredibly shallow. Yum.
#27
Posted 15 July 2008 - 05:43 PM
#28
Posted 15 July 2008 - 11:42 PM
Note: SPOILERS for those who have not seen Wanted.
Wanted 2 Already in the Works
#29
Posted 16 July 2008 - 12:32 AM
The ending of the movie was pretty decent with loose ends tied up I thought. Plus, with certain key characters dead, I didn't feel that a sequel was necessary.
#30
Posted 16 July 2008 - 03:55 AM

