Clive Owen for Bond 21
#1
Posted 16 September 2002 - 08:11 AM
No new news, Clive Owen was their man ... funny thing is there evidence is supposedly a leak stating that Owen has been "asked to look desheveled so that it draws press attention away from him in the run up to the DAD premiere when the press announcement will be made" [I'm paraphrasing as I haven't seen the article yet]
Me, I'm a little sceptical (The Daily Star is a bit of a rag) and this story has been around for ages ... and I don't actually think he is a terribly likely candidate ...
[Is this the MGM/Eon PR department doing some work for once?]
#2
Posted 16 September 2002 - 05:13 PM
http://www.teletext....tsubsectionid=7
The makers of the James Bond movies have emphatically denied a tabloid's claim that Clive Owen will replace Pierce Brosnan after Die Another Day.
The Daily Star newspaper purportedly quotes "a pal" of Owen saying "James Bond bosses" have ordered him to grow a beard so that his image cannot be associated with that of 007.
But Eon Productions, which makes the Bond films, dismissed the report as "total fiction".
In the Daily Star report, Owen is quoted as saying that he understands Brosnan recommended him to take over as Bond after Die Another Day.
But a spokeswoman at Eon told Teletext: "We are not looking for a replacement for Pierce. We are concentrating on Die Another Day and Pierce will continue as Bond."
Owen can be seen in The Bourne Identity. He impressed critics with his performance in Croupier.
16/09/2002
=======================================
Really though, why would Eon undercut their leading man at his own Premiere and declare his replacement? Especially when Brosnan has been telling everyone that he's been told the by the producers that the job is his as long as he wants it and he wants to do Bond 21.
It's more like PR from Clive Owen's people getting his name in the press, like Dougray Scott and that Dracula 2000 guy before him, and countless others. Just like all those actress's and models saying how they'd be "willing" to be the next Bond girl. How big of them, but nobody asked.
MBE
#3
Posted 16 September 2002 - 05:48 PM
#4
Posted 16 September 2002 - 07:09 PM
Besides, his name sounds a bit ordinary and lacklustre - lacking in star power perhaps. A bit like Finlay Light (although that was admittedly worse) - one of the supposed other actors with a 10 picture deal rumoured for Bond I think just when Roger Moore was about to retire.
#5
Posted 16 September 2002 - 07:39 PM
Originally posted by Welshcat
Besides, his name sounds a bit ordinary and lacklustre - lacking in star power perhaps.
To British ears, perhaps, but not American ones. . .I can't recall ever meeting a single Yank named Clive!
#6
Posted 16 September 2002 - 07:53 PM
#7
Posted 16 September 2002 - 10:16 PM
He say's that he liked play Jamesbond as the producers ask him for take the role over from Brosnan for bond 22 and more.
It's confirmd too that Pierce Brosnan play the secret agent for the last time in Bond 21.
The program ask him of he his beard savage make stand for a good view of him as bond.
And he died it.
And i must say, i like him a bit for Bond.
#8
Posted 17 September 2002 - 12:03 AM
Hasn't Pierce already said that he's doing Bond 21? After all we've been through, can we STILL not recognize a pure PR puff piece when we see one? Come on, guys...Originally posted by Predator_007
Listening to XFM this morning, they announced that The Daily Star had an exclusive as to who's going to be the new Bond in Bond 21 ...
No new news, Clive Owen was their man ... funny thing is there evidence is supposedly a leak stating that Owen has been "asked to look desheveled so that it draws press attention away from him in the run up to the DAD premiere when the press announcement will be made" [I'm paraphrasing as I haven't seen the article yet]
Me, I'm a little sceptical (The Daily Star is a bit of a rag) and this story has been around for ages ... and I don't actually think he is a terribly likely candidate ...
[Is this the MGM/Eon PR department doing some work for once?]
#9
Posted 17 September 2002 - 12:15 AM
There has been no confirmation that Bond 21 with be Brosnan's last. He's said he'd like to do another and that he's now taking them one at a time. He's unsure if he'll do any after that but nothing is definite. He says he's been told the role is his as long as he wants it and he'll figure out if he can still do the role physically etc on a film by film basis. Either way if 21 or 22 is his last they're not going to hire someone now, or offer someone else the role while he still has it, not for a role 5-7 years in the future.
#10
Posted 17 September 2002 - 01:31 AM
#11
Posted 17 September 2002 - 08:07 AM
Originally posted by zencat
After all we've been through, can we STILL not recognize a pure PR puff piece when we see one? Come on, guys...
I think you'll find I posted it as an eyes-up and my tone was dismissive.
Whether or not it's a 'PR puff piece', it pertains to Bond and as such is worthy of (scornful) discussion. Let's not get all patronising ...
And Hardyboy ... a moratorium? We are certain to find out who is the new Bond first from a source outside of Eon (they are traditionally fairly backward in coming forward). While I agree that it's not likely for some years IMO, we must discuss any rumour and then dismiss it/accept it after suitable consideration.
#12
Posted 17 September 2002 - 10:08 AM
Just thought I'd put my money into this debate !
#13
Posted 17 September 2002 - 01:17 PM
#14
Posted 17 September 2002 - 01:19 PM
I'm still trying to figure out who leaked the story and why ... If it was Eon it served no purpose other than get people talking about Bond; if it was Owen he has just been made to look silly. Ho hum.
#15
Posted 17 September 2002 - 02:01 PM
#16
Posted 17 September 2002 - 04:21 PM
#17
Posted 17 September 2002 - 04:52 PM
Originally posted by ChandlerBing
You mean, Pierce isn't doing another one? Aw, ****!
I have no doubt in my mind thats how people (non Bond fans, casual movie goers) will react when they find out Pierce is not in the next Bond film. It happend with OHMSS. As I've said before, the only way to ensure success after Brosnan leaves, is to get a bankable star, someone that everyone has heard of, and as I've said before, that man is Hugh Jackman.
#18
Posted 17 September 2002 - 07:39 PM
Originally posted by Mourning Becomes Electra
"Owen can be seen in The Bourne Identity. He impressed critics with his performance in Croupier."
There's the tell. Pure PR piece. Even Eon's denial is, believe it or not, a PR manipulation. One day you say he's Bond (1 story) the next day you report the denial (2nd story). You get two stories out of this, both of which are about promoting Clive Owen and The Bourne Identity. I'm not saying this is bad--it's the way the game is played--but don't think this has anything to do with James Bond.
#19
Posted 17 September 2002 - 07:51 PM
#20
Posted 19 September 2002 - 01:44 AM
#21
Posted 19 September 2002 - 04:19 PM
#22
Posted 28 September 2002 - 12:57 PM
I'd say Jason Isaacs(The Patriot, Event Horizon, etc.) could work as could Jackman. Hell, why don't you go for broke and get Sean Bean?!!!!!
#23
Posted 28 September 2002 - 01:10 PM
#24
Posted 30 September 2002 - 11:24 AM
#25
Posted 23 October 2002 - 11:22 AM
Sorry, I think of him as Bond and I yawn....
#26
Posted 23 October 2002 - 12:56 PM
#27
Posted 23 October 2002 - 02:39 PM
I think the producers are going to choose someone they think the public will like, hell, after Brosnan, theyre going to need to cast someone well known. Like ChandlerBing said, Eon should go with Jackman.
#28
Posted 24 October 2002 - 12:47 PM
#29
Posted 24 October 2002 - 12:58 PM
Evidently he didn't have the presence necessary to hold a role like that.
I keep slipping the name Christian Bale into these discussions but I guess no one is with me on this one. Having said that, he does look as though he has enough attitude to be a bas---d when the circumstance demands it.
#30
Posted 24 October 2002 - 04:58 PM
Anyway, the fact is it doesn't really matter who we think should be the next Bond, seeing as MGM will choose whoever they see fit, which isn't necessarily the same as we see fit. I mean, look at GL - if they can cast him they can cast ANYBODY! (Barring Robbie Williams, pray.)