Put to use during the aerial filming in Mexico

Snakehead Camera System Soars In 'Quantum of Solace'
#1
Posted 13 May 2008 - 02:38 AM
#2
Posted 13 May 2008 - 02:55 AM
I hope they can match that amazing pre-titles sequence from Moonraker. I was completely blown away as a youngster by that free-fall scene in the theatre in 1979.
Here's hoping for something totally Bondian in the skies come the Fall/Autumn...without the comedy, that is!
#3
Posted 13 May 2008 - 10:20 AM
PS - the link in the article doesn't link to this thread.

#4
Posted 13 May 2008 - 10:32 AM
That sounds like it could be awesome. Glad to see that the franchise is doing something that sounds sort of cutting edge.
Indeed! I hadn't been too excited about this aerial scene (just another scene with planes), but this may make it considerably more interesting...
#5
Posted 13 May 2008 - 12:09 PM
Greengrass, in fact, has shown his lack of class and lack of vision by publicly dissing James Bond and over-using shakey cam...whereas Eon have shown IMMENSE vision by employing THE BEST talent in virtually every field, including in the areas of director and technology. And, they continue to show their class - by effectively ignoring loud-mouthed wannabes like Greengrass.
When audiences look back 20 yrs from now, they'll look to Casino Royale and (i'm betting) Quantum Of Solace as the great adventure thrillers and not the dated, unwatchable, shakey-cam-riddled Bourne Ultimatum, which couldn't hold a candle to the great Bourne Identity.
#6
Posted 13 May 2008 - 12:26 PM
And, they continue to show their class - by effecting ignoring loud-mouthed wannabes like Greengrass.
Well said.
#7
Posted 13 May 2008 - 12:46 PM
There is an element of 'proof of the pudding' to be awaited here following the diting process.Beats the hell out of the last Bourne and Greengrass' shakey cam, something which went out of style back in early 2000s.
There were some wonderfully graceful shots of the ice lake chase in DAD which were all but completely unused in preference of editing in all of the gadget shots. All the best shots of this chase are in the James Bond on Ice documentary.
#8
Posted 13 May 2008 - 02:40 PM
That sounds like it could be awesome. Glad to see that the franchise is doing something that sounds sort of cutting edge.
PS - the link in the article doesn't link to this thread.
Gotcha - thanks, Skudor.
#9
Posted 13 May 2008 - 02:49 PM
And, they continue to show their class - by effecting ignoring loud-mouthed wannabes like Greengrass.
Well said.

Sorry about the typo...meant to say: "by effectively ignoring loud-mouthed wannabes like Greengrass."

#10
Posted 13 May 2008 - 02:51 PM
#11
Posted 13 May 2008 - 03:17 PM
What is it with you always having to create an "enemy" to be slagged off, and at the same time bigging up Eon? First it was Haggis, now its Greengrass. Do you deliberately exaggerate for effect?Beats the hell out of the last Bourne and Greengrass' shakey cam, something which went out of style back in early 2000s.
Greengrass, in fact, has shown his lack of class and lack of vision by publicly dissing James Bond and over-using shakey cam...whereas Eon have shown IMMENSE vision by employing THE BEST talent in virtually every field, including in the areas of director and technology. And, they continue to show their class - by effectively ignoring loud-mouthed wannabes like Greengrass.
When audiences look back 20 yrs from now, they'll look to Casino Royale and (i'm betting) Quantum Of Solace as the great adventure thrillers and not the dated, unwatchable, shakey-cam-riddled Bourne Ultimatum, which couldn't hold a candle to the great Bourne Identity.
As I understand it, Greengrass just doesn't like the character of James Bond, and what he perceives it represents: a certain imperialism and misogyny. Thats just his opinion, not one I share, but its his view. It doesn't demonstrate a lack of class in any way.
And the phrase "shakey-cam" is a really annoying form of reductionism which people use to undermine something that just isn't to their tastes: Greengrass doesn't just shake the camera about aimlessly, there is some serious, complex action filmmaking technique going on there that even Steven Spielberg appreciates.
Its much more likely that audiences will look back in 20 years and enjoy all the Bourne films and the Craig Bonds as great examples of action filmmaking. Theres room for both.
Edited by kneelbeforezod, 13 May 2008 - 03:18 PM.
#12
Posted 13 May 2008 - 03:32 PM
Beats the hell out of the last Bourne and Greengrass' shakey cam, something which went out of style back in early 2000s.
Greengrass, in fact, has shown his lack of class and lack of vision by publicly dissing James Bond...
As I understand it, Greengrass just doesn't like the character of James Bond...
...which means he'll never get near a James Bond film*.
Good!
*Unless he pays up for a ticket.
#13
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:03 PM
And, they continue to show their class - by effecting ignoring loud-mouthed wannabes like Greengrass.
Well said.![]()
Sorry about the typo...meant to say: "by effectively ignoring loud-mouthed wannabes like Greengrass."
...and I agree all the same.

#14
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:08 PM
#15
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:14 PM
As a huge fan of Bourne, I was pretty irritated by the camera use in the Bourne films, especially this last one. At times it is great for the action, at other times it annoyed me.
The shakey cam use in Supremacy was at time too much. It felt like the suspence was derived from the fact that you couldn't see what was happenening, which seems counter productive in a movie.
Did anyone else chuckle at the name of this new camera technology... snakehead made me think of something completely different.
#16
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:16 PM
Yeah! He's a talentless, classless scumbag and the sooner his career is in ruins the better!...which means he'll never get near a James Bond film*.
Good!
Thank God for those folk at Eon, whose boundless humility, prescience, altruism, flair and genius inspires me to be a better man... no... a better human being every day! God bless you Eon, England's rose!
#17
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:21 PM
Yeah! He's a ... classless scumbag ......which means he'll never get near a James Bond film*.
Good!
Thank God for those folk at Eon, whose boundless humility, prescience, altruism, flair and genius inspires me to be a better man... no... a better human being every day! God bless you Eon, England's rose!
Generally agreed! Except for the last bit. The two folk who run Eon are Americans. Even James Bond needs some good old Marshall Aid.

#18
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:22 PM
I actually agree that there are moments in Supremacy that cross the line and become a bit bewildering, but overall I can see what they are trying to achieve.The shakey cam use in Supremacy was at time too much. It felt like the suspence was derived from the fact that you couldn't see what was happenening, which seems counter productive in a movie.
As`Spielberg himself said:
"Quick-cutting is very effective in some movies – like the “Bourne” pictures – but you sacrifice geography when you go for quick-cutting.
[That] is fine because audiences get a huge adrenaline rush from a cut every second and a half [in] “The Bourne Ultimatum”.
There’s just enough geography for the audience never to be lost especially in the last “Bourne” film, which I thought was the best of the three."
#19
Posted 13 May 2008 - 04:35 PM
There is an element of 'proof of the pudding' to be awaited here following the diting process.Beats the hell out of the last Bourne and Greengrass' shakey cam, something which went out of style back in early 2000s.
There were some wonderfully graceful shots of the ice lake chase in DAD which were all but completely unused in preference of editing in all of the gadget shots. All the best shots of this chase are in the James Bond on Ice documentary.
Thanks for pointing that out. I've always felt that the fight scenes in TND, which should have been superb with Michelle Yeoh on board, were ruined in the editing. Similarly Jet Li has pretty much been wasted in his American efforts. Hip-hop Fu just ain't for me. Anyway, I'll keep an eye for that Ice documentary. Might afford the chance for me to see DAD more fairly.
#20
Posted 13 May 2008 - 06:35 PM
In the Cold War mindset, are we, lads? How very Fleming-esque...Generally agreed! Except for the last bit. The two folk who run Eon are Americans. Even James Bond needs some good old Marshall Aid.Yeah! He's a ... classless scumbag ......which means he'll never get near a James Bond film*.
Thank God for those folk at Eon, whose boundless humility, prescience, altruism, flair and genius inspires me to be a better man... no... a better human being every day! God bless you Eon, England's rose!

#21
Posted 13 May 2008 - 08:44 PM
In the Cold War mindset, are we...? How very Fleming-esque...Generally agreed! Except for the last bit. The two folk who run Eon are Americans. Even James Bond needs some good old Marshall Aid.Yeah! He's a ... classless scumbag ......which means he'll never get near a James Bond film*.
Thank God for those folk at Eon, whose boundless humility, prescience, altruism, flair and genius inspires me to be a better man... no... a better human being every day! God bless you Eon, England's rose!
Well, not quite...let's not forget that Her Majesty's Secret Servant is largely funded by Yank and Jap money these days...

#22
Posted 13 May 2008 - 08:53 PM
That sounds like it could be awesome. Glad to see that the franchise is doing something that sounds sort of cutting edge.
YES! At long last, too. And here's to hoping they keep the cutting edge end up. No more entire decades of technical faltering, please. Not in my lifetime at least.
#23
Posted 14 May 2008 - 03:24 PM
I actually agree that there are moments in Supremacy that cross the line and become a bit bewildering, but overall I can see what they are trying to achieve.
As`Spielberg himself said:
"Quick-cutting is very effective in some movies
#24
Posted 14 May 2008 - 04:25 PM
I'm actually amazed more people didn't complain about this. I enjoyed the film thoroughly, but the extent to which it simply repeated stuff from Supremacy really surprised me.I felt "Ultimatum" was lacking because the story was repetetive
#25
Posted 14 May 2008 - 07:00 PM
Absolutely it did. I've only seen Sup twice and Ult once, but I donI'm actually amazed more people didn't complain about this. I enjoyed the film thoroughly, but the extent to which it simply repeated stuff from Supremacy really surprised me.I felt "Ultimatum" was lacking because the story was repetetive
#26
Posted 14 May 2008 - 08:23 PM
I'm actually amazed more people didn't complain about this. I enjoyed the film thoroughly, but the extent to which it simply repeated stuff from Supremacy really surprised me.
[/quote]
Absolutely it did. I've only seen Sup twice and Ult once, but I don
#27
Posted 15 May 2008 - 12:52 AM
When we look back on December 31, 2009 on the 'Top 10 Of The Decade', it will be The Bourne Identity from '02 that will show up on people's list and not the two that followed. And, somewhere on that list the 9-time BAFTA-nominated Casino Royale will no doubt make an appearence...and, hopefully, Quantum Of Solace (Snakey-head-cam and all) too.
#28
Posted 15 May 2008 - 04:32 AM
Its evidence of nothing of the sort I'm afraid. The Bourne Identity is looking more and more like a fluke, as Liman followed it up with the bloated Mr and Mrs Smith and the utterly crap Jumper. He isn't in Greengrass's league.Just more evidence of Doug Liman's superiority over Greengrass.
When you look back on December 31, 2009 on the 'Top 10 Of The Decade', it will be The Bourne Identity from '02 that will show up on your list and not the two that followed.When we look back on December 31, 2009 on the 'Top 10 Of The Decade', it will be The Bourne Identity from '02 that will show up on people's list and not the two that followed.
And you are very much in the minority on that one.
#29
Posted 15 May 2008 - 04:45 AM
When the camera is shaking on two people sitting in a diner you know there's a problem.
Edited by Colossus, 15 May 2008 - 04:46 AM.
#30
Posted 15 May 2008 - 05:33 AM
When you look back on December 31, 2009 on the 'Top 10 Of The Decade', it will be The Bourne Identity from '02 that will show up on your list and not the two that followed.When we look back on December 31, 2009 on the 'Top 10 Of The Decade', it will be The Bourne Identity from '02 that will show up on people's list and not the two that followed.
And you are very much in the minority on that one.
Really, eh?
I'm in the minority? LOL
Take a pole. Start a thread and see where people put Identity, Supremacy and Ultimatum.
I don't think i'm in the minority with the opinion that The Bourne Identity will be THE movie of the three that will show up on the Top 10 Of The Decade lists.
As I said, take a pole.
Also take a pole to see which one people think suffers from the over-use of the so-called 'shakey cam' methodology of hand-held filming. I think most would vote for Ultimatum as its use of shakey-cam was unbearably irritating.