I suppose it was pretty obvious it would be called that, really. What with Greene's 'Q' lapel pin.
http://img505.images...2/qos002sg3.jpg
Sorry, but I'm not buying into it, and I cite the PAUL HAGGIS ARGUMENT as my case: a few weeks after the initial press conference Haggis stated that he didn't have anything to do with the title being selected, which contradicts the notion that the Organisation is called "Quantum". If it was to be called Quantum, it's likely he would have had some idea of what the title was before it was announced, which he stated was not the case. For the Organisation to be called "Quantum" in a film called
Qunatum of Solace without the screenwriter having any idea as to what the title was is too big a coincidence for me to accept. No, I think the writer of this article has come to his own conclusion based on Dominic Greene's lapel pin.
We know Greene's out to control the world's water supply
Then explain to me this: how the hell does taking control of the
driest place on Earth give you control of the world's water supply? If you read the article in full, Michael G. Wilson stated that Bolivia has seen problems with the control of its water supply in the past, which is where I think this author has gotten the idea from. If you listen to the audio commentary in the gallery, th author also states that the plot involves executing a coup d'etat in
several South American countries, when we know it's just Bolivia that is involved.