Edited by Niwram, 07 February 2008 - 01:26 PM.
Is ... a bad guy?
#1
Posted 07 February 2008 - 01:24 PM
#2
Posted 07 February 2008 - 02:09 PM
#3
Posted 07 February 2008 - 05:48 PM
#4
Posted 07 February 2008 - 05:54 PM
She doesn't really sound any more villainous than she has when scolding Bond in past films. "This is about trust. I thought I could trust you." That could have been taken from the script for CASINO ROYALE.Is it me or is there something freaky about M in the scene at 00:01:16? The way she's dressed, for example, she looks like a Bond villain. And she sounds like one, too, like she's just had him kidnapped after a major action scene.
And as far as I can tell, the room is actually Bond/Fields' honeymoon suite.
Eh, maybe. Some people have suspected it, but I really hope not. It just seems a bit... Bourne-like to me. I want Dench's character to be a good 'un, and frankly, I don't think they'd want to spoil the image of Dench's M. She's been with the series for a long time.I know it's far fetched, but it would be very movie-ish, and a the most shocking twist in Bond history. Maybe that's why they are being so cautious about plot details. It's just a theory.
#5
Posted 07 February 2008 - 05:56 PM
Eh, maybe. Some people have suspected it, but I really hope not. It just seems a bit... Bourne-like to me. I want Dench's character to be a good 'un, and frankly, I don't think they'd want to spoil the image of Dench's M. She's been with the series for a long time.I know it's far fetched, but it would be very movie-ish, and a the most shocking twist in Bond history. Maybe that's why they are being so cautious about plot details. It's just a theory.
I don't want them to go down this route either, but I suspect that this is where they're headed. It was set up a bit in Casino Royale, with her telling Bond not to trust anyone and how she inexplicably knew how and why Bond survived the torture at the hands of Le Chiffre. Also, she let Vesper go on the assignment, when she should have run a thorough check on her before allowing her to do so. The line "sometimes we're so focused on our enemies, we forget to watch our friends" could be a hint as well.
#6
Posted 07 February 2008 - 05:57 PM
xxx
#7
Posted 07 February 2008 - 06:00 PM
#8
Posted 07 February 2008 - 06:03 PM
Eh, I don't think so at all. "Don't trust anyone" is a simple lesson, and knowing how and why Bond survived was just filling in the blanks. Nothing more.It was set up a bit in Casino Royale, with her telling Bond not to trust anyone and how she inexplicably knew how and why Bond survived the torture at the hands of Le Chiffre.
Seriously, I doubt EON would turn M into a villain, ever, much less Dench's M, who has become an institution of sorts. If they were to do the "M is a baddie" thing, I'd imagine they'd do it with a new face.
Now, that's more believable. It's been said that she and Bond would be butting-heads throughout, and in the plot summary, it even says that Bond has to be one step ahead of MI6. Also, given on Craig's comments that "Bond's more in control, but others don't think that's the case," points to something like that, too.Another theory about the scene in question could be that, perhaps Bond's actions throughout the course of the film have really brought Bond to the brink of being thrown out of the service, which could be happening in this scene.
#9
Posted 07 February 2008 - 06:16 PM
I expect Bond is exceeding his orders/being reckless/playing fast and loose with the rules again. Which is good news.
#10
Posted 07 February 2008 - 06:19 PM
I call B.S. on this. There's no benefit to be gained by making M a villain. The dynamic between Craig's Bond and Dench's M is a standout for the series. Throwing something with that much juice away in favor of a banal plot twist that everyone has seen played out in lesser films would ultimately make no one happy and would be the height of stupid.
Agreed. I don't want to see M become a villain, nor after thinking about it do I think that it will happen here, but I can't say that I'd be shocked either to see it happen at some point, either in this film or a film in the near future.
#11
Posted 07 February 2008 - 06:25 PM
Nay! A sacrilege!
#12
Posted 07 February 2008 - 06:26 PM
#13
Posted 07 February 2008 - 06:50 PM
I call B.S. on this. There's no benefit to be gained by making M a villain. The dynamic between Craig's Bond and Dench's M is a standout for the series. Throwing something with that much juice away in favor of a banal plot twist that everyone has seen played out in lesser films would ultimately make no one happy and would be the height of stupid.
Well stated. I'm not worried because I honestly don't think they would do something that boneheaded... but then again a few years ago they thought an invisible car would be a good idea.
#14
Posted 07 February 2008 - 07:15 PM
#15
Posted 07 February 2008 - 07:32 PM
"You keep using that word, Vauxhall. I do not think it means what you think it means."To turn Dench's M into a villain would be about one of the worst moves that they could make. It is ridiculous to think that someone has risen to the top of MI6 over a career spanning probably 30-40 years without being noticed for any questionable links to villains. Inconceivable in my opinion.
Don
#16
Posted 07 February 2008 - 07:37 PM
"You keep using that word, Vauxhall. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Don
#17
Posted 07 February 2008 - 07:40 PM
"You keep using that word, Vauxhall. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Don
#18
Posted 07 February 2008 - 07:42 PM
"You keep using that word, Vauxhall. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Don
#19
Posted 07 February 2008 - 07:50 PM
"You keep using that word, Vauxhall. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Don
#20
Posted 07 February 2008 - 07:51 PM
"You keep using that word, Vauxhall. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Don
#21
Posted 07 February 2008 - 08:50 PM
No, but what if M thought there was a legitimate reason to do this?
#22
Posted 07 February 2008 - 09:36 PM
I'm more and more convinced.
[ibox]Bond discovers that Greene is forging a deal with exiled General Medrano. Manipulating his powerful contacts within the CIA and the British government, Greene promises to overthrow the existing regime in a Latin American country, giving the General control of the country.
In a minefield of treachery, murder and deceit...
As he gets closer to finding the man responsible for the betrayal of Vesper, 007 must keep one step ahead of the CIA, the terrorists and even M, to unravel Greenes sinister plan and stop his organisation[/ibox]
#23
Posted 07 February 2008 - 09:38 PM
#24
Posted 07 February 2008 - 09:39 PM
I'm more and more unconvinced.I'm more and more convinced.
And I don't see how that plot summary indicates anything about M being a traitor. It does indicate that MI6 has been infiltrated, but we already knew that.
#25
Posted 07 February 2008 - 11:11 PM
I certainly don't see that clip of M and Bond from the featurette as suggesting that M could be evil. If she was, then they certainly wouldn't hint at it in a behind-the-scenes clip anyway! They would remain totally secretive until the movie is released.
#26
Posted 08 February 2008 - 12:03 AM
#27
Posted 08 February 2008 - 08:58 AM
I think Bond is the traitor, and Blofeld is his real name. "M" is just a cover for Agent 007, the famous Jane Bond.....
#28
Posted 08 February 2008 - 09:05 AM
#29
Posted 08 February 2008 - 01:06 PM
#30
Posted 08 February 2008 - 01:19 PM
Dear me, interesting speculation guys but that's not happening. Even if it were they wouldn't show a clip of possibly the most shattering scene in Bond history on a featurette right at the start of shooting the new film.
Bond has clearly just done something very against the rules/code of conduct, that's all.
Edited by Leon, 08 February 2008 - 01:19 PM.