140 replies to this topic

[jaguar007]

I think I just wet myself.

[Marketto007]

Now on Youtube guys! I've posted there.

"Quantum Of Solace" - Behind The Scenes (Moviefone)
http://br.youtube.co...h?v=fQQCStsNv6U



xxx

[Dalton]

Looking good. Things are shaping up for a great movie.

[Harmsway]

The coolest thing for me are those shots of the fight on the scaffolding/ropes in the art gallery. That's top notch.

[Sir James Moloney]

[quote name='Royal Dalton' post='834595' date='7 February 2008 - 17:30'][quote name='Sir James Moloney' post='834571' date='7 February 2008 - 16:38']Does anyone have a downloadable link or something? Cause I have a bloody fool for a web system administrator and he has blocked all streming videos.
I

[tdalton]

[deleted]

[Harmsway]

The rest of it, though, looks a bit uninspired.

Seriously, I thought it was the rest of it that was more impressive. That scene with the ropes and the art gallery had me catching my breath.

[tdalton]

[deleted]

[Harmsway]

The scene with the ropes was the worst part of the video to me.

Why? What's not to love?

[tdalton]

[deleted]

[Andrew]

Anyone else catch the brief flash of Felix standing in front of a plane next to an unidentified man?

It really looks fantastic. The action, the sets, everything.

Craig also shows that the role just oozes from his pores. QoS could be his GF, in the sense that in that film Connery really came to own the role.

[JimmyBond]

The scene with the ropes was the worst part of the video to me.

Why? What's not to love?

It just looks extremely silly and looks to be just more needless action.

As a fellow who enjoys action in his Bond films I found it all rather appetite whetting. Can't wait to see more

[Vauxhall]

Anyone else catch the brief flash of Felix standing in front of a plane next to an unidentified man?

Yes, indeed. This perhaps could be the action that was rumoured to have been shot at Farnborough aerodrome?

[Judo chop]

The scene with the ropes was the worst part of the video to me.

Why? What's not to love?

It just looks extremely silly and looks to be just more needless action.

How does one distinguish

[tdalton]

[deleted]

[Mr. Blofeld]

[quote name='tdalton' post='834689' date='7 February 2008 - 14:49'][quote name='Judo chop' post='834687' date='7 February 2008 - 14:44'][quote name='tdalton' post='834660' date='7 February 2008 - 13:06'][quote name='Harmsway' post='834658' date='7 February 2008 - 14:04'][quote name='tdalton' post='834655' date='7 February 2008 - 13:02']The scene with the ropes was the worst part of the video to me.[/quote]
Why? What's not to love?
[/quote]

It just looks extremely silly and looks to be just more needless action.
[/quote]
How does one distinguish

[Judo chop]

[quote name='tdalton' post='834689' date='7 February 2008 - 13:49'][quote name='Judo chop' post='834687' date='7 February 2008 - 14:44'][quote name='tdalton' post='834660' date='7 February 2008 - 13:06'][quote name='Harmsway' post='834658' date='7 February 2008 - 14:04'][quote name='tdalton' post='834655' date='7 February 2008 - 13:02']The scene with the ropes was the worst part of the video to me.[/quote]
Why? What's not to love?
[/quote]

It just looks extremely silly and looks to be just more needless action.
[/quote]
How does one distinguish

[The Dove]

As Bond said in Thunderball.." Well...you can't win em all!! " Of course you are entitled to your opinions tdalton, but to say that the video looks uninspiring is beyond me.. Of course this action is still in the rough draft stage..lets hope that the final film persuade you.. " Perhaps a demonstration will convince you. " - Max Zorin "A View To A Kill"

[Mr. Blofeld]

"Perhaps a demonstration will convince you."

Or at least a drop out of a blimp...

[DamnCoffee]

OMG! Brilliant Find! This is shaping up to be a brilliant Bond Movie! Plus the fact that the videos numbered, gives an inkling that there is more to come!

Anyone noticed Felix at 2:23?

[Harmsway]

[quote name='tdalton' post='834660' date='7 February 2008 - 13:06']It just looks extremely silly and looks to be just more needless action.[/quote]
No sillier than the very silly car chase or ski chase in FOR YOUR EYES ONLY, a movie you love, or the car chase/rooftop pursuit in THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS. I'd actually argue it actually looks less silly than either.

[quote name='Judo chop' post='834687' date='7 February 2008 - 13:44']How does one distinguish

[Eddie Burns]

TDalton...its a Bond movie, not The Godfather. Criticizing the action at this stage is completely pointless, especially when you have no idea as to how or when it fits in with the story. I know you have your own expectations of what should be in a Bond film and what shouldn't, but for the past 21 movies Bond films have tried to be nothing more but just that...Bond films. I feel the producers have taken a step in the right direction with Casino Royale and successfully re-invigorated the series despite your protestations. Now they're testing the waters and seeing what works and what doesn't. Twice as much action shouldn't bother you. There are no gadgets and Bond will still have to use his wits to survive. And i'm sure it will all fit in with the story. But i'm getting the sense that your really out of touch with Bond. Applaud the producers for taking the step instead of throwing your toys out of the pram just because you didn't get your way. And to think there are still people out there that say Casino Royale just didn't 'feel' like a Bond movie, which I love to hear. Never knew Bond could go over people's head like that

As for the footage, I think we're getting a slick, polished, modern but at the same time gritty and suspenseful spy thriller. Sprinkle a little Ken Adam, Bond theme, and some action and voila! There you have it...

I have faith that surely this movie can't be worse than Casino Royale. Do any of you?

[Matt_13]

With the amount of action that this movie holds do you think we'll see a teaser trailer sooner than we did with Royale? This video looks astounding btw.

[Harmsway]

So the bits of dialogue we get from the film are as follows:

EXT. BUILDING (MI6 HQ?)

M: Well, ask him about Slate.

TANNER: (to headset) She wants to know about Slate. (to M) Slate was a dead end.

M: He killed him?

INT. HOTEL - HONEYMOON SUITE

M: This is about trust. I thought I could trust you.

[Vauxhall]

That seems about right. In addition to what we already had:

[box]INT. MI6 HEADQUARTERS (?)

BOND:

[dinovelvet]

The scenes with M, Tanner, and Bond look like they will be better than the M/Bond scenes in Casino Royale. The rest of it, though, looks a bit uninspired.

Who didn't see this coming?

Do you get a kick out of trying to bring everyone else down, or something?

[Mr. Blofeld]

Hmmmm... sounds like Slate tails Bond to Cairo, where he meets a "dead end"...

[MR. BOND 93]

Wow! The action sequence with the ropes looks amazing, and did anyone else catch Felix in there?

[Vauxhall]

Hmmmm... sounds like Slate tails Bond to Cairo, where he meets a "dead end"...

As far as we know, Bond doesn't actually go to Cairo, and that he is laying a false trail by saying that he is.

[Royal Dalton]

Hmmmm... sounds like Slate tails Bond to Cairo, where he meets a "dead end"...

As far as we know, Bond doesn't actually go to Cairo, and that he is laying a false trail by saying that he is.

Yep. I'd wager Slate's the chap Bond's fighting with on those ropes. So he's probably going to pop his clogs in Siena.