CBn brings you the storyline of the 22nd James Bond film
'Quantum of Solace' Official Plot Synopsis
#1
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:09 PM
#2
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:12 PM
#3
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:15 PM
#4
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:16 PM
#5
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:18 PM
Interesting to note that the synopsis indicates that Dominic Greene and the man responsible for Vesper's betrayal are different people.
#6
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:18 PM
#7
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:18 PM
I'm not opening up the main page article, but if this is indeed a synoposis shouldn't it be in the Spoilers section?!
Hmmmm... I was thinking that, too.
#8
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:18 PM
#9
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:21 PM
Yes, I'm certainly feeling that Greene is not Vesper's former boyfriend. I may well be wrong, but that's my gut instinct.Interesting to note that the synopsis indicates that Dominic Greene and the man responsible for Vesper's betrayal are different people.
#10
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:22 PM
#11
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:22 PM
Usually, officially released plot summaries aren't put in the same category as "spoilers."I'm not opening up the main page article, but if this is indeed a synoposis shouldn't it be in the Spoilers section?!
This is a rather vague plot summary that gives the basic shape of QUANTUM OF SOLACE's story without giving a whole lot away.
#12
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:25 PM
My excitement level for this film has ramped up unbelievably high.
#13
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:25 PM
Well, that's what the plot synopsis seems to point out. According to the synopsis, after Bond's found Greene, he's still searching for the man responsible for Vesper's betrayal. It's good to see the roles separated.Yes, I'm certainly feeling that Greene is not Vesper's former boyfriend. I may well be wrong, but that's my gut instinct.Interesting to note that the synopsis indicates that Dominic Greene and the man responsible for Vesper's betrayal are different people.
And one thing I really like about this plot is the political nature of it all, with upheaval in a South American country. Good stuff.
#14
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:26 PM
Usually, officially released plot summaries aren't put in the same category as "spoilers."I'm not opening up the main page article, but if this is indeed a synoposis shouldn't it be in the Spoilers section?!
This is a rather vague plot summary that gives the basic shape of QUANTUM OF SOLACE's story without giving a whole lot away.
Still I am trying to stay as unspoiled as possible. I feel that I already am beginning to know too much about the movie. I believe my enjoyment of Casino Royale was enhanced by knowing little of what was going to happen in the movie.
Thank you to the staffer who moved it to the Spoilers section.
#15
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:28 PM
I like that as long as it's not a fictional S. American country. Until they say which actual country that one is going to worry me a bit.And one thing I really like about this plot is the political nature of it all, with upheaval in a South American country. Good stuff.
#16
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:30 PM
But please, please tell me that the "MI6 traitor" just means Vesper, and they're not doing the traitor-within-the-service thing again already. MI6 and CTU recruit from the same pool, it would seem.
#17
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:31 PM
#18
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:31 PM
In all liklihood, it's going to be fictional.I like that as long as it's not a fictional S. American country. Until they say which actual country that one is going to worry me a bit.And one thing I really like about this plot is the political nature of it all, with upheaval in a South American country. Good stuff.
#19
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:34 PM
I think you're right but I don't like it at all.In all liklihood, it's going to be fictional.I like that as long as it's not a fictional S. American country. Until they say which actual country that one is going to worry me a bit.And one thing I really like about this plot is the political nature of it all, with upheaval in a South American country. Good stuff.
#20
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:34 PM
Mild speculation, but SPECTRE, anyone?
#21
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:35 PM
If it was Vesper, they'd mention her by name. And secondly, Vesper wasn't from MI6. She was with the Treasury. So it's another traitor-within-the-service.But please, please tell me that the "MI6 traitor" just means Vesper, and they're not doing the traitor-within-the-service thing again already.
Furthermore, given that it's "forensic intelligence" links the MI6 traitor, I imagine that we'll see Bond kill said agent during the pre-title sequence in an action scene of some sort. Perhaps the MI6 traitor will violently interrupt the interrogation with Mr. White, killing him to silence him?
#22
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:35 PM
If they can handle that without making the MI6 traitor a big revelation...if it's a realistic situation where he/she is merely being paid off to be an insider, I can probably deal with it fine. Another self-motivated Frost or Trevelyan, not so much.If it was Vesper, they'd mention her by name. And secondly, Vesper wasn't from MI6. She was with the Treasury. So it's another traitor-within-the-service.But please, please tell me that the "MI6 traitor" just means Vesper, and they're not doing the traitor-within-the-service thing again already.
Furthermore, given that it's "forensic intelligence" links the MI6 traitor, I imagine that we'll see Bond kill said agent during the pre-title sequence in an action scene of some sort. Perhaps the MI6 traitor will violently interrupt the interrogation with Mr. White, killing him to silence him?
Surely not...they can be more daring than that. That would be disappointing.In all liklihood, it's going to be fictional.I like that as long as it's not a fictional S. American country. Until they say which actual country that one is going to worry me a bit.And one thing I really like about this plot is the political nature of it all, with upheaval in a South American country. Good stuff.
#23
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:36 PM
The thing about "one of the world's most important natural resources." Hmmmm...in South America....anyone have thoughts what it might be?
Bond keeping "one step ahead" of the CIA, MI6 and M. Hmmmm, I hope this really isn't a highlight of the film. Again, I think this sort of thing has been done too many times in spy films.
"Using his associates in the organisation, and manipulating his powerful contacts within the CIA and the British government, Greene promises to overthrow the existing regime in a Latin American country, giving the General control of the country in exchange for a seemingly barren piece of land."
^That sounds AWESOME. It's these sorts of things that I've been wanting to see in Bond films.
I guess it's safe to assume that the South American country will be either made up, or never mentioned.
Edited by RivenWinner, 24 January 2008 - 08:37 PM.
#24
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:36 PM
#25
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:37 PM
#26
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:37 PM
On a mission that leads him to Austria, Italy and South America, Bond discovers that Greene, conspiring to take total control of one of the world
#27
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:38 PM
ThatBut please, please tell me that the "MI6 traitor" just means Vesper, and they're not doing the traitor-within-the-service thing again already. MI6 and CTU recruit from the same pool, it would seem.
#28
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:39 PM
If it is a real nation, I don't see why they wouldn't just name it in the summary.Surely not...they can be more daring than that. That would be disappointing.In all liklihood, it's going to be fictional.I like that as long as it's not a fictional S. American country. Until they say which actual country that one is going to worry me a bit.And one thing I really like about this plot is the political nature of it all, with upheaval in a South American country. Good stuff.
But personally, I don't see how it's worth caring about. I could care less that LIVE AND LET DIE's San Monique didn't actually exist, and I could care less whether this South American nation is a real one or not.
#29
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:40 PM
I'd be very surprised if Bond 23 wasn't a continuation of Quantum of Solace in some capacity.The way I read it, the movie is aiming to set up the man who betrayed Vesper as the major villain in BOND 23...
#30
Posted 24 January 2008 - 08:43 PM
I don't see why you're worrying about it. The character's clearly a throwaway who shows up for a few minutes at the beginning of the film who then dies, if he ever appears alive at all (it's possible that M just throws out the info that there was a traitor inside MI6 who was killed and that forensics found such-and-such). At the most we'll get a Dryden level of development, and it's probably far more likely that we won't even see that.If they can handle that without making the MI6 traitor a big revelation...if it's a realistic situation where he/she is merely being paid off to be an insider, I can probably deal with it fine. Another self-motivated Frost or Trevelyan, not so much.If it was Vesper, they'd mention her by name. And secondly, Vesper wasn't from MI6. She was with the Treasury. So it's another traitor-within-the-service.But please, please tell me that the "MI6 traitor" just means Vesper, and they're not doing the traitor-within-the-service thing again already.
Furthermore, given that it's "forensic intelligence" links the MI6 traitor, I imagine that we'll see Bond kill said agent during the pre-title sequence in an action scene of some sort. Perhaps the MI6 traitor will violently interrupt the interrogation with Mr. White, killing him to silence him?
I think my scenario with Bond and M trying to interrogate Mr. White, only to have it interrupted by a traitor who kills White, followed by a chase and then the traitor's death is the likely scenario. It would fit as a PTS opening.