If Dalton did Goldeneye
#1
Posted 14 August 2007 - 07:26 PM
#2
Posted 14 August 2007 - 07:42 PM
#3
Posted 14 August 2007 - 08:02 PM
Yes.Would you have liked it better with Dalton in it?
What might have been...
#4
Posted 14 August 2007 - 08:55 PM
Regards
#6
Posted 14 August 2007 - 09:10 PM
The problem Brosnan faces is it's his debut film as Bond and we're given a whole back story that goes back 9 years. We're not that familiar with him as Bond yet (although some may argue it seemed like he was way back to that time).
While the plot is somewhat generic and an easy way to introduce a new Bond, the 00 vs 00 premise is harder to accept since that history is lacking. Knowing Dalton and the more angst-ridden Bond he was, this fits his version better.
Besides, Brosnan had two more betrayal Bond films in his era. Three's a crowd in this case.
#7
Posted 14 August 2007 - 09:39 PM
That said, I will admit that I don't think it would have done quite as well box office wise with Dalton as it did Brosnan.
#8
Posted 14 August 2007 - 09:40 PM
#9
Posted 15 August 2007 - 04:46 PM
There is no justice in the world for Daltonites.
#10
Posted 15 August 2007 - 05:35 PM
How about this; Laz turns down more Bond after OHMSS and Sean can't make it for DAF. The whole bit with John Gavie was a gag to get Tim Dalton to come down on his salary demands. Starting with DAF through to and including GE we have a long period of Dalton as Bond.
There is no justice in the world for Daltonites.
You have just made concrete an eternal friendship with MHazard, but have invoked the fiery wrath of Santajosep.
There
#11
Posted 15 August 2007 - 05:38 PM
CBn Forums: The Text Game, coming soon from Infocom.You have just made concrete an eternal friendship with MHazard, but have invoked the fiery wrath of Santajosep.
#12
Posted 17 August 2007 - 08:58 PM
There is no justice in the world for Daltonites.[/quote]
You have just made concrete an eternal friendship with MHazard, but have invoked the fiery wrath of Santajosep.
There
#13
Posted 18 August 2007 - 09:40 PM
But I have to also agree with one of the posters above that perhaps it might not have done as well at the box office with Dalton compared to Brosnan. But maybe that's because people were already prejudiced against Dalton's portrayal. Perhaps if that had been Dalton's debut movie (ie he was the same age he was when he made TLD) then maybe he would've been accepted more readily. Dalton came after Moore, when everyone was still expecting a light-hearted Bond. Perhaps Dalton was too ahead of his time when TLD came out, but by the time of GE, people's expectations had changed.
#14
Posted 18 August 2007 - 09:51 PM
However, Brosnan was far better than I ever imagined him to be and I actually think his Bond developed and balanced what Dalton had started.
I don't think GoldenEye would have been as successful had Dalton come back, it grieves me to say.
#15
Posted 18 August 2007 - 10:08 PM
Yeah, probably not. Of course, financially speaking, GoldenEye benefitted enormously from the relaunch double whammy of having a new Bond, and being the first film for six years.I don't think GoldenEye would have been as successful had Dalton come back, it grieves me to say.
John Calley was quite shrewd in that regard...
#16
Posted 18 August 2007 - 10:14 PM
True. For me it would have been Sophie's Choice - risk the franchise or deep six my favourite Bond.Yeah, probably not. Of course, financially speaking, GoldenEye benefitted enormously from the relaunch double whammy of having a new Bond, and being the first film for six years.I don't think GoldenEye would have been as successful had Dalton come back, it grieves me to say.
John Calley was quite shrewd in that regard...
Think they made the right choice but I still hold a candle for Tim.
Brosnan was a far better Bond than I imagined and we were very lucky. His success certainly paved the way for the Casino Royale route.
#17
Posted 18 August 2007 - 10:31 PM
For me it would have been Sophie's Choice - risk the franchise or deep six my favourite Bond.
Yeah. And maybe it's better to leave the audience wanting more, rather than overstay your welcome, anyway.Think they made the right choice but I still hold a candle for Tim.
Brosnan was a far better Bond than I imagined and we were very lucky. His success certainly paved the way for the Casino Royale route.
#18
Posted 21 August 2007 - 03:20 AM
Certainly, GoldenEye has many Dalton references in it. The plane trip in Cuba "yes sir" line , "dont make it personal" for example.
#19
Posted 21 August 2007 - 10:09 AM
There is no justice in the world for Daltonites.[/quote]
You have just made concrete an eternal friendship with MHazard, but have invoked the fiery wrath of Santajosep.
There
#20
Posted 22 August 2007 - 05:15 PM
There is no justice in the world for Daltonites.[/quote]
You have just made concrete an eternal friendship with MHazard, but have invoked the fiery wrath of Santajosep.
There
#21
Posted 05 September 2007 - 09:39 PM
The racing scene Bond has with Xenia probably wouldn't fit Dalton too well, but almost every other part of the movie had me envisioning Dalton playing the role. I especially would have loved to see Dalton's reaction to the "ressurection" of Alec Trevelyan and his betrayal. The confrontations between Trevelyan and Dalton's Bond would have been awesome.
GoldenEye is the one film from the Brosnan era which seems like it would have better suited Dalton.
#22
Posted 06 September 2007 - 06:47 AM
However, I really like Brosnan in it.
And believe it or not, it was a huge smash, and everyone loved Brosnan at the time, and he "saved the series" as far as the press were concerned. It's amazing. Back then I would never have believed that Bond fans would not like him.
#23
Posted 06 September 2007 - 01:58 PM
#24
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:09 PM
Not everyone. Kim Newman, in his review of GoldenEye for Empire magazine, said Brosnan's performance was "stolid."And believe it or not, it was a huge smash, and everyone loved Brosnan at the time
#25
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:23 PM
#26
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:34 PM
#27
Posted 06 September 2007 - 04:31 PM
http://blogs.nypost....otos/clive2.jpg
or
http://www.nndb.com/...3694/tcurry.jpg
#28
Posted 06 September 2007 - 04:46 PM
While I think it was one of the best Bond films that Brosnan did, I would have loved to have seen Dalton as Bond in this one. It seems so right for Dalton. I wish he would have taken over for Moore in his couple of rounds as Bond as well.
That's what I said. I wonder what TD thinks of his fans wanting more TD as bond?
#29
Posted 06 September 2007 - 04:49 PM
GE seemed designed for Dalton's brooding interpretation and as Alec Trevelyan I could see either:
http://blogs.nypost....otos/clive2.jpg
or
http://www.nndb.com/...3694/tcurry.jpg
Either Michael France or Jeffrey Caine were quoted as saying that their very first treatment of GE was submitted to Cubby in the early 90s when TD was still the incumbent and it was he that they had in mind when they structured the story. Fierstein came on board later when there was clearly going to be a new actor. Thus his quotes about hearing SC's voice when he did rewrites, rather than on TND when he knew he was writing for Brozza.
#30
Posted 10 September 2007 - 10:17 AM
Edited by Mr Teddy Bear, 10 September 2007 - 10:18 AM.