An Open Letter To MGM From A Bond Fan...
#61
Posted 16 August 2002 - 04:49 PM
#62
Posted 16 August 2002 - 04:57 PM
Hey, now there's an idea. A boycott of all (non-Bond) MGM films. It's not like we'd be missing anything.Originally posted by killkenny kid
But MGM will never get another dollar from me for anything that isn't a Bond movie.
#63
Posted 16 August 2002 - 05:03 PM
#64
Posted 16 August 2002 - 05:10 PM
#65
Posted 16 August 2002 - 05:11 PM
Too bad MGM and EON can't see that. My God, we're the people who are keeping Bond alive. We're celebrating Bond, discussing Bond, and--what's more--giving MGM and EON tons of FREE PUBLICITY. You'd think that rather than persecuting the Bond sites, MGM/EON would embrace them and support them. . .but I guess that's a little too forward-thinking for the toothless old lion.
#66
Posted 16 August 2002 - 05:15 PM
Even though I'm loath to say anything nice about MGM right now, I did really like LEGALLY BLONDE and GHOST WORLD (even through that was UA) and their home video division is tops. They put some terrific DVDs.Originally posted by rafterman
I once heard a quote that said MGM wasn't really a studio since all they do is put out a Bond film every two or three years with nothing in between....without Bond there is no studio...
#67
Posted 16 August 2002 - 05:23 PM
#68
Posted 16 August 2002 - 05:48 PM
#69
Posted 16 August 2002 - 05:57 PM
#70
Posted 16 August 2002 - 06:13 PM
Originally posted by zencat
Even though I'm loath to say anything nice about MGM right now, I did really like LEGALLY BLONDE and GHOST WORLD (even through that was UA) and their home video division is tops. They put some terrific DVDs.
Oh yeah, Ghost World was great and the DVDs are quite nice....love watching an MGM DVD, love that opening....
#71
Posted 17 August 2002 - 03:34 AM
Funny how the 3 main sites that ran with the story and had it posted and discussed on the forums suddenly were all threatened with legal action...
That is simply poor work on who ever's behind it. It would have been much more effective for the companies involved to politely contact the site and ask to have the content removed without threatening legal action.
AJB and MI6 pulled the script pages from the forums remember. So did CBN from memory. Poor effort by EON and/or MGM.
Its funny that they have shamelessly attacked the very life source of the franchise. Most people don't get on the internet and talk for two or three years between movies about franchises (star wars, matrix, bond) except for their major fans. Good way to effectively piss us off.
But the good and bad thing is if they stuff DAD it's going to be US who are the most dissapointed or pleased, much more so than the general public.
They should sign Lee to a directors contract, least he seems to be shaking things up a bit, while keeping things the same.
Very sad day to be a bond fan. Get your act together.
Couldn't see Cubby letting something happen this drastically.
#72
Posted 17 August 2002 - 05:26 AM
Originally posted by zencat
Even though I'm loath to say anything nice about MGM right now, I did really like LEGALLY BLONDE and GHOST WORLD (even through that was UA) and their home video division is tops. They put some terrific DVDs.
MGM does put ou some terrific DVD's. I've got tons of DVD's from their Avant Garde and Midnight Movie collections. MGM are the proud owners of several of the Vincent Price films. And where would I be without my Elvis films?
#73
Posted 17 August 2002 - 08:18 AM
I mean, we know who the head guys at EON are.
Our grievances are about Bond and EON own Bond.
#74
Posted 17 August 2002 - 09:25 AM
#75
Posted 17 August 2002 - 12:04 PM
#76
Posted 17 August 2002 - 12:40 PM
#77
Posted 17 August 2002 - 01:51 PM
#78
Posted 17 August 2002 - 02:57 PM
#79
Posted 17 August 2002 - 03:07 PM
A note to EON/MGM: Let Daniel Dykes or Dave Winter become our personal Steve Sandsweet, our new Yarborough, someone we'd love to hear from every few days!
#80
Posted 17 August 2002 - 03:12 PM
#81
Posted 17 August 2002 - 04:43 PM
#82
Posted 18 August 2002 - 03:38 PM
#83
Posted 18 August 2002 - 06:04 PM
PS. I completely agree with and support Zencat and everyone who has written in this thread. Also, for my information, when exactly did the legal action take place?
#84
Posted 18 August 2002 - 07:39 PM
#85
Posted 18 August 2002 - 10:23 PM
#86
Posted 18 August 2002 - 10:49 PM
Lot of good laughs in that one.
#87
Posted 18 August 2002 - 11:25 PM
But MGM would have passed on it and another studio makes it instead.
#88
Posted 19 August 2002 - 12:28 AM
#89
Posted 19 August 2002 - 08:45 AM
So, who would you cast as the MGM execs?
I would choose Nathan Lane for Nathanson (apologies to the actor, I've never seen a picture of said exec)!!
#90
Posted 19 August 2002 - 12:17 PM
You know, this and other sites ARE the advertising campaign for MGM and DAD and they cost nothing other than the use of pictures. So by shutting it down, MGM again proves that they have no clue how internet sites actually promote things, rather than infringe on them. This site has done nothing but spread the word of Die Another Day for EON and MGM. It generates interest for the film, basically selling it to fans, who will tell others about it. The site makes money-for MGM.
A Steve Sansweet type is needed. Star Wars understands its fans. Go to the official Star Wars site and have your questions answered by everyone involved in the films, except George himself.
At the Star Trek site, Trektoday, their message boards are frequently visited by the authors and editors of their books. It's not the television producers, but it is a nice link between the fans and the manufacturers. Imagine if Raymond Benson or Glidrose reps posted here, listened and took what we said into consideration like those Trek authors do. They talk to the people who buy their product.
I think the problems are mostly with MGM. They don't make the films themselves, they sit back with too much time on their hands and too many unneeded employees and so they sick them on websites for imagined violations instead of selling their product. All studios make bad decisions. MGM seems to consistently make them.
Also MGM rely on Bond, but don't seem to care or even like their product. They're not fans of it, hence they make suggestions like "hire Denise Richards, the kids love her." They're also the ones who give us title options like If Looks Could Kill and Black Sun and ask us to vote in these ridiculous meetings of people off the street. (forgive me, I forget the correct term...)
Many at the other franchises seem to actually care about getting their product to the fans, while maintaining ownership. They don't give too much, but they don't crush fans who just want to enjoy the product...imagine MGM stealing domain names from websites because someone somewhere uses the numbers 007...
MGM has shot themselves in the foot here. It's just another move that will bring the studio further and further down...