The "Royale" would have been the world's first space casino.
Possibly the greatest quote I've ever read on here
Posted 19 April 2007 - 06:52 PM
The "Royale" would have been the world's first space casino.
Posted 19 April 2007 - 07:30 PM
Maybe he's not convincing as Bond, but he is utterly convincing as a great human being. Not a very good explanation, I know, but it works for me .
Edited by LadySylvia, 19 April 2007 - 07:32 PM.
Posted 19 April 2007 - 07:44 PM
Edited by Dr.Mirakle32, 19 April 2007 - 07:45 PM.
Posted 19 April 2007 - 07:48 PM
I get chills thinking about it!
Posted 19 April 2007 - 07:52 PM
I get chills thinking about it!
So do I.
Posted 19 April 2007 - 08:07 PM
You've been spending far too much time on those horror film forums, Dr. M.I would also have Le Chiffre played by a proper actor. While Mads was great, he was NOTHING like the Fleming character. He was too handsome and Bondian, plus he was written as more sympathetic.
How about Peter Cushing or Vincent Price? While certainly not looking like the Fleming character, they were such great actors, they could definitely pull off the villain's edge and lecherous persona.
Posted 20 April 2007 - 12:29 AM
Maybe he's not convincing as Bond, but he is utterly convincing as a great human being. Not a very good explanation, I know, but it works for me .
I thought that Moore was convincing as Bond. I believed so for 12 years. I still believe so when watching his old movies. Since when does Bond have to be portrayed in a particular style? He hasn't in nearly 40 years.
Alright, I have to defend Sean's honor here. The reason that Connery fans forgive him the campiness of later Bonds is based on DN, FRWL, GF, and TB (I don't have time to argue the merits of GF, but despite some camp elements it is not in total a camp movie and still allows suspension of disbelief-I will save that argument for another thread).
Why should Connery be forgiven for the campiness in his movies? I don't think that his early movies should give him an excuse to escape such a reputation. The Age of Camp began during his tenure. Surely he can take some responsibility, as well? If you're going to forgive Connery for the campiness in his films because of his first four movies, then you might as well forgive Moore for his better movies. And as far as I'm concerned, GOLDFINGER was a campy movie. In fact, I believe that it ushered in the Age of Camp.
Posted 20 April 2007 - 01:23 AM
If Casino Royale had starred Roger Moore, it would have been the GREATEST Bond movie ever made!
Right now, it is still in my top five, but since Roger IS my favorite Bond, including him would only make it better.
However, if it was made during his tenure, I would have it be similar to the 2006 script, but closer to the Fleming novel.
The Madagascar and Bahamas subplots as well as the Venice ending would be included, but it would still be based in the cold war, have a male M, white Felix, and General Gogol would make an appearance.
Sure it would still be funny, since James Bond is still a funny guy (he still is in the 2006 film) but it would also be a great chance for Roger highlighting the ruthless Bond persona he does so well (I am serious, look at LALD, TMWTGG and the car kicking scene in FYEO.)
I would also have Le Chiffre played by a proper actor. While Mads was great, he was NOTHING like the Fleming character. He was too handsome and Bondian, plus he was written as more sympathetic.
How about Peter Cushing or Vincent Price? While certainly not looking like the Fleming character, they were such great actors, they could definitely pull off the villain's edge and lecherous persona.
It would also be sweet to see either David Hedison return, or Steve McQueen as a proper Felix Leiter.
I have no idea who would play Vesper, but I'm sure it would be someone good.
Think of it:
You're sitting in the theater after seeing TSWLM. It is 1978, and you are looking foward to seeing a classic down-to-earth Bond movie after that huge extravaganza.
You see the UA logo and the famous Moore gunbarrel with an epic rendition of the Bond theme written by John Williams. It fades out.
TWENTY YEARS AGO....
(B/W)
New York. A younger looking Moore is sneaking around the RCA building in New York. He is seen setting up his silenced rifle. We cut away to a group of Japanese businessmen talking. All leave but one. Bond knows what he has to do. He shoots his target in the head as ordered. He later finds his way to Stockholm where he interrogates an EX MI-6 businessman and has a few drinks with him, talking him up and pretending to be his friend. "Well Mr. Sterling, you are a very charming man. But you are obviously new to this business, so why would Universal Exports send you here to confront me?" Then BAM! He pulls out his Walther and shoots the guy in the head.
Bond: Because nobody does it better.
We cut away to the full-color Maurice Binder titles, with an original song by the BeeGees.
"Albert R. Broccoli presents
ROGER MOORE
as
JAMES BOND
-007
in
IAN FLEMING's
CASINO
ROYALE
Staring Vincent Price
with Steve McQueen as Leiter
and Bernard Lee as M
Music by John Williams
Written by Richard Maibaum and Michael G. Wilson
Directed by Terence Young"
Then we cut away to MADAGASCAR: THE PRESENT and the rest in history.
I get chills thinking about it!
Posted 20 April 2007 - 01:25 AM
I agree 100%. For me Roger Moore was the wrong Bond at the wrong time. And in many respects I'm not sure it was totally his fault. If you look at episodes of the Saint, Moore can be cold hearted and brutal and really vicious in the fight sequences. But this just never came across in the Bond films he made.I enjoy a good spy spoof (Austin Powers, Derek Flint, etc.) but it's hard for me to accept Roger's Bond on that basis due to my dissapointment that the books they stole the titles from were adapted so badly.
Posted 20 April 2007 - 01:40 AM
I agree 100%. For me Roger Moore was the wrong Bond at the wrong time. And in many respects I'm not sure it was totally his fault. If you look at episodes of the Saint, Moore can be cold hearted and brutal and really vicious in the fight sequences. But this just never came across in the Bond films he made.I enjoy a good spy spoof (Austin Powers, Derek Flint, etc.) but it's hard for me to accept Roger's Bond on that basis due to my dissapointment that the books they stole the titles from were adapted so badly.
Posted 20 April 2007 - 07:52 AM
I'd say this is where the problem occurs. If I were judging Rog on Flemingness, I wouldn't like him either. I made a subconscious decision years ago to ignore Fleming and appreciate Rog for himself. I do the same thing when reading Young Bond. To me, they're all Bond but in totally different ways and I tend not to compare to anything but just accept each as they are.4. I'm a hardcore Fleming fan so I tend to rate movies on how much of Fleming they incorporate and how well. None of Roger's movies made me think I was seeing an adaptation of the book they were named after. I enjoy a good spy spoof (Austin Powers, Derek Flint, etc.) but it's hard for me to accept Roger's Bond on that basis due to my dissapointment that the books they stole the titles from were adapted so badly.
Posted 20 April 2007 - 09:17 AM
Posted 20 April 2007 - 03:07 PM
Posted 20 April 2007 - 08:01 PM
Posted 20 April 2007 - 09:27 PM
Posted 20 April 2007 - 09:32 PM