Neal Purvis And Robert Wade Discuss 'Bond 22' Details
#91
Posted 08 April 2007 - 10:18 AM
#92
Posted 08 April 2007 - 11:01 AM
I'm part of the no-Q and no-MP party. They are part of another era. Whatever title EON uses I hope, and actually have some faith in them, that it will be a good one.
As for the story? As long as it's a whopper of a story, I'm good.
The clown thing in IF's notebook is intriguing because it would be so hard to pull off. I like the aspect of a crowd standing around watching men fight and no one intervenes because the crowd take it as entertainment. This has happened in a number of true crime cases. It's like the scene Hitchcock wanted to film someday; the hero goes to an auto plant to investigate a murder. He interviews the foreman while a car is being built right in front of them. When the car is finished, the foreman asks the hero if he will drive it off the line. The hero opens the door and a corpse falls out!
Hitch and IF are awesome.
This idea sound like it might have been adapted and used in Octopussy. The sequence where the agent gets stabbed and stumbles into an embassy party dressed as a clown springs to mind here.
#93
Posted 09 April 2007 - 06:55 AM
#94
Posted 12 April 2007 - 07:11 AM
While I'm no fan of OCTOPUSSY (or Roger Moore's Bond), please note that it was Ian Fleming's idea to have a man dressed as a clown fighting for his life whilst an audience laughs mistaking his actions for comedy. I don't believe he ever wrote it, but I know he mentioned it in an interview.
Really? Now that's interesting.
It's in one of Fleming's notebooks. There's a idea of a fight between Bond and an assassin that takes place at an embassy party. Both 007 and the other man are disguised in clown costumes, so (as Jackanaples mentions) the party guest all think it's part of the entertainment and stand around watching.
Is it okay to be glad Fleming left that idea in his notebook, and never actually wrote it into a story? Yech.
#95
Posted 16 April 2007 - 12:21 AM
#96
Posted 18 April 2007 - 04:23 AM
#97
Posted 20 April 2007 - 02:00 AM
I'm part of the no-Q and no-MP party
But will you want Villiers to return in Bond 24, for example?
#98
Posted 26 April 2007 - 06:13 PM
#99
Posted 26 April 2007 - 06:31 PM
I'm part of no party. If they can make the characters work, great, I won't mind seeing them again.
That IS what it all comes down to, isn
#100
Posted 27 April 2007 - 01:55 AM
#101
Posted 27 April 2007 - 02:36 AM
#102
Posted 27 April 2007 - 04:24 AM
Curious what people think, if we see these characters (Q, Moneypenny, Tanner) in Bond 22, should Bond be introduced to them or should he interact with them as if they were alawys around?
It would be interesting to see Bond introduced to Moneypenny and for Bond to be more attracted to her than she is to him, at first!
#103
Posted 27 April 2007 - 04:29 AM
#104
Posted 27 April 2007 - 04:36 AM
I don't think he should be introduced to Q--if he's even in Bond 22. Just go the Dr. No/From Russia With Love route for the scene (or something along those lines).
I agree.
M can ask for Major Boothroyd in the same manner as in Dr No.
#105
Posted 27 April 2007 - 04:39 AM
#106
Posted 27 April 2007 - 04:41 AM
Precisely. I'm undecided when it comes to Miss Moneypenny.
I think Daniel Craig's flirting with Moneypenny would be great - in fact, it would be very similar to his sparring with Vesper on the train in CR.
And I fail to see why Villiers is a better character than Moneypenny. He is just an iffeminite charicature.
#107
Posted 27 April 2007 - 05:22 AM
#108
Posted 27 April 2007 - 05:26 AM
I don't think it's so much that he's a better character, just that he's different. You know the old saying, familiarity breeds contempt, it's nice to have a break from the norm every now and then.
True. Fair point.
But I think alot of non-Bond fanatics (those who don't come on this site) missed some of the regular things, like Moneypenny and Q.
And Villiers is a shocking stereotype. It's the Sheriff Pepper of an English person. It's like the Simpsons came up with the character. And don't get me started on the doctor. My uncle is ex-SAS and he told me that the chances of all those intelligence staff having those accents are 500-1...!!
#109
Posted 27 April 2007 - 05:35 AM
But I think alot of non-Bond fanatics (those who don't come on this site) missed some of the regular things, like Moneypenny and Q.
Perhaps, but it didnt hurt the Box office much, nor did I see it mentioned much in any professional reviews.
#110
Posted 27 April 2007 - 06:22 AM
Does it strike anyone as rather odd that Purvis and Wade, the guys who gave James Bond an invisible car and made him surf a CGI wave, have suddenly become apostles of a stripped-down, less gimmicky Bond? WHere were these guys in 2002?
#111
Posted 28 April 2007 - 03:54 AM
Does it strike anyone as rather odd that Purvis and Wade, the guys who gave James Bond an invisible car and made him surf a CGI wave, have suddenly become apostles of a stripped-down, less gimmicky Bond? WHere were these guys in 2002?
They got to go off entirely fresh Flemming material, thats why CR was so great IMO, as others have said, their true colours will be seen with 22, good or bad.
As for Q, the Major Boothroyd bit in Dr. No is a perfect example for how 'Q' could be, if not an addition to the film, at least not a detraction.
#112
Posted 28 April 2007 - 05:24 AM
They got to go off entirely fresh Flemming material, thats why CR was so great IMO, as others have said, their true colours will be seen with 22, good or bad.
I wouldnt be too sure of that. They've turned in their draft and moved on. Someone is going to come in and do a polish, it might be a complete overhaul or it might be a small rewrite. Whatever it is, we'll (once again) have a hard time telling what they're responsible for.
#113
Posted 28 April 2007 - 05:32 AM
They got to go off entirely fresh Flemming material, that's why CR was so great IMO, as others have said, their true colours will be seen with 22, good or bad.
I would be too sure of that. They've turned in their draft and moved on. Someone is going to come in and do a polish, it might be a complete overhaul or it might be a small rewrite. Whatever it is, we'll (once again) have a hard time telling what they're responsible for.
Does anybody know who the other writer is going to be? I am not a huge fan of Paul Haggis, but the Casino Royale script kicked derriere.
#114
Posted 28 April 2007 - 07:00 AM
Does anybody know who the other writer is going to be? I am not a huge fan of Paul Haggis, but the Casino Royale script kicked derriere.
Nobody knows. Just a couple rumors here and there. Haggis again, Tom Stoppard. I'd put my money on the former at least being offered.
#115
Posted 28 April 2007 - 08:14 AM
They got to go off entirely fresh Flemming material, thats why CR was so great IMO, as others have said, their true colours will be seen with 22, good or bad.
I wouldnt be too sure of that. They've turned in their draft and moved on.
The first draft is never the final draft, so they will continue to be working on the script. A first draft is like a rough blueprint of everything that will no doubt change.
#116
Posted 28 April 2007 - 11:07 PM
#117
Posted 30 April 2007 - 08:57 AM
Okay, but they are the credited writers of the film, so wouldn't just hand in a first draft and run. They'd be rewriting from here on in.Well, they're busy working on another movie right now. While that doesnt preclude them from returning and going over there script again, I seriously doubt it.
#118
Posted 30 April 2007 - 09:55 AM
Q however is a useless character once you miss Desmond. Gadgets are all over us by now, why would bond need someone showing off his new GPS tracking system ? Everyone got one.
#119
Posted 01 May 2007 - 01:43 AM
why would bond need someone showing off his new GPS tracking system ? Everyone got one.
This is the British government. There would be 10 people with this job, and another 5 who would be advisors to the 10 who do this job.
#120
Posted 19 June 2007 - 09:52 PM
Not a joking, deadpan Q, but a tight, no-nonsense type of character. Hugh Laurie would be great in a role like this!
I'm thinking Moneypenny should be used as a voiceover for the films- kind of an opening, and closing narrative, or something like that. Not really seen, but just heard.