Bond 22: Live And Let DIe?
#1
Posted 21 October 2006 - 12:55 AM
Ok, so we got a reboot..so why not go one step further and make Casino Royale along with 22 the concept where we actually see Fleming's work on film.
On the one hand you'll have the people who say "It's been done before and it doesn't need a retelling." But it wouldn't exactly be a retelling, take Moonraker for instance...although I respect Sir Roger Moore's portrayal of Bond, Moonraker almost certainly HAS to be the lousiest piece of film in the cannon. I think there's now a chance...if done correctly...to make it better by sticking with the original plot of sorts, sure the ICBMs have to change to more leathal missles but keep the missles and Gala Brand, stick with the plot and it should be good.
Need I go into how much the novel for Diamonds Are Forever than the film?
Anyhow, that's what I'm thinking could happen. If the idea has been discussed before forgive me for flogging a dead horse of sorts but I would like to hear feedback anyhow.
#2
Posted 21 October 2006 - 01:02 AM
#3
Posted 21 October 2006 - 01:06 AM
Of course, I'd watch it anyway, but I'd rather see something new. The only Fleming novel/film I'd like to see "remade" is YOLT since the film was completely different from the book.
#4
Posted 21 October 2006 - 01:07 AM
I can live with seeing a down to Earth and faithful Moonraker adaptation though - obviously with new characters and a different title (perhaps one of the good titles that got passed over in favor of just 'Moonraker'). I've lobbied for that in the past and it really hasn't been done on film yet. If anything I'd love to see the scene in Blades used in a future film, probably Bond 23 to distance itself from Casino Royale. Fleming has been tapped though. I would hope they could take from what he wrote and write something new and great in that spirit without rehashing 40-50 year old ideas that have mostly been done before in other Bond films.
#5
Posted 21 October 2006 - 02:33 AM
I gotta say, I'm with 008. Live And Let Die as a film had only most of the main characters' names, the location of New York, and the use of African-Americans in common with the novel. The only irreplaceable element of the original, IMO, is the title song. And FYEO only had the use of the coral-dragging sequence. And LTK used only the Leiter mutilation and warehouse location.
I don't mention these things to discredit these other films, but we really haven't seen Live And Let Die as a complete story before. And it's really one of Fleming's best (sorry, imposing my own opinion).
The LALD novel plot isn't completely dated...the finding of lost treasure and the plan to use it for terrorist financing isn't completely lame. Even if this isn't the exact plot, it is certainly adaptable. I'd die to see this story redone with most all of its original elements restored. It's a great enough story that it deserves to be given a fair opportunity to be seen in today's climate. Might it be smart to organize the villainous network differently than Fleming did (all blacks)? Uh, probably so.
In the case of a new version versus the '73 film, I'm all for the retelling of Fleming's actual stories in a time when camp isn't considered an improvement upon the original material. Sorry, J-Dub.
#6
Posted 21 October 2006 - 02:53 AM
#7
Posted 21 October 2006 - 03:24 AM
#8
Posted 21 October 2006 - 03:39 AM
The rest of the novel is really expendable and most of the cool scenes have already been pillaged.
#9
Posted 21 October 2006 - 04:18 AM
The LALD novel plot isn't completely dated...the finding of lost treasure and the plan to use it for terrorist financing isn't completely lame. Even if this isn't the exact plot, it is certainly adaptable. I'd die to see this story redone with most all of its original elements restored. It's a great enough story that it deserves to be given a fair opportunity to be seen in today's climate. Might it be smart to organize the villainous network differently than Fleming did (all blacks)? Uh, probably so.
Can't help but agree with you here, though I do think the title should be changed. To release Bond 22 as LALD would draw unfair comparisons between the new film and Moore's debut. And even if the faithful adaption was the better film, people would still choose Moore's over it, because it came first.
#10
Posted 21 October 2006 - 04:26 AM
No thanks...been there, done that.
Of course, I'd watch it anyway, but I'd rather see something new.
Agreed.
#11
Posted 21 October 2006 - 06:29 AM
Definitely agree. I want to see something else like the filming of the continuation novels instead. Besides, if EON remade the 007 novels in order, it would be the end of the Bond series. Yes, hardcore Bond fans would see them, but the average moviegoer would not. They will have seen it before and after a film or two would want something original and look for it elsewhere. No, the future for movie-Bond is either with continuation novels or original screenplays entirely.
No thanks...been there, done that.
Of course, I'd watch it anyway, but I'd rather see something new.
Agreed.
#12
Posted 21 October 2006 - 12:14 PM
#13
Posted 21 October 2006 - 07:06 PM
Definitely agree. I want to see something else like the filming of the continuation novels instead. Besides, if EON remade the 007 novels in order, it would be the end of the Bond series. Yes, hardcore Bond fans would see them, but the average moviegoer would not. They will have seen it before and after a film or two would want something original and look for it elsewhere. No, the future for movie-Bond is either with continuation novels or original screenplays entirely.
No thanks...been there, done that.
Of course, I'd watch it anyway, but I'd rather see something new.
Agreed.
Well, it might be a very long while until or even if the continuation novels are made for film....
Not that I want to rehash the original novels..I just thought it would be a good...or even semi good idea to actually film the Fleming novels in order for the younger, and older fans who would be interested in seeing it done.
Or maybe that's just too anal-retentive? But thanks for the feedback nonetheless
#14
Posted 21 October 2006 - 07:13 PM
#15
Posted 21 October 2006 - 07:17 PM
#16
Posted 21 October 2006 - 07:19 PM
#17
Posted 21 October 2006 - 07:21 PM
#18
Posted 24 October 2006 - 11:33 PM
#19
Posted 25 October 2006 - 12:10 AM
#20
Posted 25 October 2006 - 12:47 AM
Edited by Sanjuro007, 25 October 2006 - 12:49 AM.
#21
Posted 25 October 2006 - 03:14 AM
Although I have my reservations, I think I would be happy if Bond 22 was Live and Let Die if the filmmakers made a commitment to "re-imagining" all of Fleming's work in order, but with the idea of giving the series a more direct sense of continuity, emphasizing previously unused Fleming material, and creating "story arcs" (although still delivering standalone flicks), which all would culminate with The Man With The Golden Gun. By that time, it'll be high time for either a reboot or a return to GE/TND/TWINE-style "new adventures." But then again, I'm just interested in seeing Bond films period. Just make good movies!
My thoughts exactly.
#22
Posted 25 October 2006 - 03:53 AM
I've expressed my views on this before, but this is the best place for me to do so.
I gotta say, I'm with 008. Live And Let Die as a film had only most of the main characters' names, the location of New York, and the use of African-Americans in common with the novel. The only irreplaceable element of the original, IMO, is the title song. And FYEO only had the use of the coral-dragging sequence. And LTK used only the Leiter mutilation and warehouse location.
I don't mention these things to discredit these other films, but we really haven't seen Live And Let Die as a complete story before. And it's really one of Fleming's best (sorry, imposing my own opinion).
The LALD novel plot isn't completely dated...the finding of lost treasure and the plan to use it for terrorist financing isn't completely lame. Even if this isn't the exact plot, it is certainly adaptable. I'd die to see this story redone with most all of its original elements restored. It's a great enough story that it deserves to be given a fair opportunity to be seen in today's climate. Might it be smart to organize the villainous network differently than Fleming did (all blacks)? Uh, probably so.
In the case of a new version versus the '73 film, I'm all for the retelling of Fleming's actual stories in a time when camp isn't considered an improvement upon the original material. Sorry, J-Dub.
I agree completely. I'm so pleased they kept CR for last (last of the Flemings at least) but LALD didn't get nearly the service it deserved. What a fantastic book, and what a lack-luster film (IMO). Lets see it with Craig and the seriousness and textual accuracy it should have had in the first place!
#23
Posted 25 October 2006 - 05:18 AM
#24
Posted 31 October 2006 - 06:42 AM
1. The network of blacks. There is no way that MAJOR race issues would pop up if the villains were all African-American.
2. The method to 'control' that network. LALD operated on the principle that there were a large number of lower-class blacks that would be simple enough to buy into the voodoo threat of Baron Samedi.
3. The long train sequence. Who would actually travel by train for efficiency instead of scenery today?
Unless there were an AMAZING way to adapt/skip these major issues, perhaps there isn't a way to remake this story. That would really be a pity, IMO. It's one of the best stories. And with this spoiler about Bond 22, it sounds as if they're not gonna move too far away from CR.
#25
Posted 31 October 2006 - 07:37 AM
#26
Posted 31 October 2006 - 08:07 AM
Now that I'm actually into the book again, there are several major points that I admit I can't imagine how to adapt.
1. The network of blacks. There is no way that MAJOR race issues would pop up if the villains were all African-American.
2. The method to 'control' that network. LALD operated on the principle that there were a large number of lower-class blacks that would be simple enough to buy into the voodoo threat of Baron Samedi.
3. The long train sequence. Who would actually travel by train for efficiency instead of scenery today?
Unless there were an AMAZING way to adapt/skip these major issues, perhaps there isn't a way to remake this story. That would really be a pity, IMO. It's one of the best stories. And with this spoiler about Bond 22, it sounds as if they're not gonna move too far away from CR.
I agree it would be quite a challenge. A lot of things would have to be modernized and accounted for in a "re-imagining" of the book. So much so that it might be impossible to get right.
If they did try to adapt it, I think Daniel Craig could really hold his own and not look totally out of place as Roger Moore (quite intentionally) did in LALD.
#27
Posted 31 October 2006 - 09:47 AM
#28
Posted 31 October 2006 - 02:16 PM
#29
Posted 31 October 2006 - 02:41 PM
#30
Posted 31 October 2006 - 03:29 PM