All against Hugh, Russel, Matthew and Mel, sign here!
#1
Posted 24 May 2002 - 04:00 PM
Hugh Jackman would make a really rubbish 007
Russel Crowe would make a really rubbish 007
Matthew Perry would make a really rubbish 007
Mel Gibson would make a really rubbish 007
A repeat of George Lazenby we do not want!!!!!!!!
#2
Posted 24 May 2002 - 06:36 PM
Hugh Jackman would not be "rubbish"--he's an extremely talented actor who has the right look and who could handle the English accent easily (witness Kate and Leopold). However, beyond being typecast as Wolverine, the main problem with Jackman is that he's on the verge of becoming a major star. By the time Pierce Brosnan steps down, Jackman may be too expensive and/or unwilling to sign a three-picture contract. I think his career will have to stay where it is now or hit the skids before he'd play Bond.
Matthew Perry--that's just an internet rumor or something started by Perry's agent to get his name out to the public. In fact, when Perry was asked about Bond, he said that this was the first he'd heard of it. And could you imagine Perry as Bond? He'd twitch through the role and deliver his lines like this: "What. . .do you expect me. . .to do, Goldfinger? TALK?!"
Mel Gibson is way too old. . .some people are complaining about Brosnan's age now (well at least on my usual site, AJB), so can you imagine how someone who's OLDER than Brosnan would be greeted? Russell Crowe is a great actor, but after his Oscar he'd be far too expensive for EON, and I'm not sure they'd be willing to deal with him--he has a bad reputation for fighting and being difficult to deal with. I doubt Crowe would give two figs for upholding the Bondian image.
#3
Posted 24 May 2002 - 08:41 PM
#4
Posted 25 May 2002 - 07:00 AM
But seriously, I think because of what America is, people would rather her Majesty's loyal terrier did not come from there.
#5
Posted 25 May 2002 - 06:38 PM
#6
Posted 25 May 2002 - 08:49 PM
#7
Posted 25 May 2002 - 08:50 PM
#8
Posted 26 May 2002 - 02:13 AM
#9
Posted 24 May 2002 - 06:01 PM
The only one who is capable of managing it with any degree of success at the moment is Hugh Jackman. I don't think this would be the case however ,if he got typecast in the X-men series.
It's hard to break typecasting, can you imagine Matthew Perry play the role it'd just be wrong. Nobody would take him seriously, because we'd all be thinking of Chandler in Friends.
I agree that Mel Gibson and Russell Crowe shouldn't and won't play Bond, because the salaries they would command would not be easily justified by EON. Oh, and they'd probobly want too much control.
#10
Posted 28 May 2002 - 03:14 PM
General Koskov (25 May, 2002 08:00 a.m.):
But seriously, I think because of what America is, people would rather her Majesty's loyal terrier did not come from there.
Really, General. Why do you have such a grudge against us?
#11
Posted 29 May 2002 - 08:03 AM
#12
Posted 29 May 2002 - 09:42 AM
Russel Crowe would make a really rubbish 007
Matthew Perry would make a really rubbish 007
Mel Gibson would make a really rubbish 007
Agreed.
#13
Posted 29 May 2002 - 11:49 PM
i'd like to hear the head of mi6 list his top 4 post-brosnan bonds...
mine: jackman, mcgregor, owen, law
#14
Posted 30 May 2002 - 12:41 AM
DavidFries (28 May, 2002 04:14 p.m.):
General Koskov (25 May, 2002 08:00 a.m.):
But seriously, I think because of what America is, people would rather her Majesty's loyal terrier did not come from there.
Really, General. Why do you have such a grudge against us?
Because you built the White House again after I worked so hard to burn it down! Just kidding!
No grudge,( ) I just assume that American actors have a mark against them (in playing Bond) for being American. But perhaps if there's an American who's really good, he'll get the job. I'd have no problem with that.
#15
Posted 30 May 2002 - 07:19 PM
General Koskov (30 May, 2002 01:41 a.m.):
But perhaps if there's an American who's really good, he'll get the job. I'd have no problem with that.
I appreciate what you've said. Mind you, I'd prefer a British actor myself, and I'm not pushing any American for the role. I personally have no real opinion, Jackman looks fine, but I haven't seen any of his stuff.
But GK, if you have no grudge against us Yanks.....
General Koskov (25 May, 2002 08:00 a.m.):
But seriously, I think because of what America is, people would rather her Majesty's loyal terrier did not come from there.(emphasis added)
What is America to you? I understand preferring a Brit for a British role, but why would an American be desriminated against "because of what America is?" What is that exactly?
#16
Posted 30 May 2002 - 07:30 PM
ray t (30 May, 2002 12:49 a.m.):
for james page:
i'd like to hear the head of mi6 list his top 4 post-brosnan bonds...
mine: jackman, mcgregor, owen, law
1) Robbie Williams
2) Robbie Williams
3) Robbie Williams
4) Robbie Williams
...and now you don't know if I'm being serious or not
#17
Posted 30 May 2002 - 11:06 PM
#18
Posted 31 May 2002 - 01:39 AM
General Koskov (31 May, 2002 12:06 a.m.):
What I meant about 'what America is' is that America is a sovreign country created by a revolution against the British Emprire. I know that is pretty old to be affecting Bond films, but there may be some sort of animosity hanging around. Or not.
--------------------------------------------------
well general, i'm neither american or british (canadian actually!) but if bond can use a BMW...originally an aircraft manufacturer which was an integral supplier to the LUFTWAFFE in Nazi Germany's air effort against the UK in WWII (in which they bombed the
[cuss] out of greater London)...i'm sure using a qualified actor form a country that had a not too dis-similiar "problem" with the British as the germans had 170 years later should not be too difficult to fathom!
also to James Page:
i heard Eon considers Robbie Williams a Joke.
The guy appearently needs to have acting lessons...
i guess your hoping for robbie to get the role so he can quickly run a 40-odd year franchise into the ground
#19
Posted 31 May 2002 - 02:32 PM
ray t (31 May, 2002 02:39 a.m.):
i heard Eon considers Robbie Williams a Joke.
The guy appearently needs to have acting lessons...
i guess your hoping for robbie to get the role so he can quickly run a 40-odd year franchise into the ground
Well... The replacement needs to have charisma, confidence and bravado. None of the other "contenders" have it in as much quantity as Mr Williams. For that reason alone I dropped his name.
Sure, of course, he will need acting lessons. And Debbie McWilliams (casting), who seems to think she will be making the calls on this issue, said no way will he ever get near the part (and then went to see him in concert the next day).
But the man himself said he'd give up his music career and go to theatre school for as long as it took.
Which is a hell of a lot more than Mr Lazenby did, and some say he did pretty well :-P
#20
Posted 31 May 2002 - 05:18 PM
#21
Posted 31 May 2002 - 05:40 PM
#22
Posted 01 June 2002 - 02:25 AM
she loves Pierce, Hugh Jackman, and Colin Firth... she, in fact, doesnt even mind Greg Wise and hugh grant (who seems to be branching away from his "foppish" hair and roles)
#23
Posted 01 June 2002 - 02:37 AM
rafterman (31 May, 2002 06:40 p.m.):
I'm American and I want Bond to be played by a non American...I like the character because he is British and an American doing a British accent is just an American doing a British accent...no phonies please...we need someone from the commonwealth....
What about a Canadian? We have rather American accents (except for Kingstonians and Newfies--more like Irish). So could a Canadian 'fake' an accent and be Bond? Because some people are very good at accents--but then you don't want a 'character actor', rather someone who plays 'themself'.
#24
Posted 01 June 2002 - 04:15 AM
#25
Posted 01 June 2002 - 05:50 AM
DavidFries (01 Jun, 2002 05:15 a.m.):
Ben Affleck and Brad Pitt are bankable movie stars, and decent actors. Forget for a minute that they don't look like Bond. Even if they could pull off the accent, and the suave sophistication, they still couldn't be Bond. They're too American in their history.
I wouldn't want to see either actor as Bond either (heck, they've had to ratchet down the age of Jack Ryan because Affleck's playing him--would we likewise get a Bond right out of the spy academy?); but, again just for the sake of argument, have you seen Brad Pitt in The Devil's Own, opposite Harrison Ford? Pitt plays an IRA terrorist on the run, and he does a good job with the accent and of disappearing into the role. In fact, I've always had a lot of respect for Pitt because he hasn't cashed in on his pretty boy looks and done teeny-bopper flicks: he goes out there and acts.
#26
Posted 01 June 2002 - 02:35 PM
#27
Posted 01 June 2002 - 03:02 PM
I don't want anyone to get the part if they have to go to acting class...then it's kind of obvious they got it based on something other than talent....I say find an unknown who can already act.....
#28
Posted 01 June 2002 - 08:18 PM
#29
Posted 01 June 2002 - 09:16 PM
DavidFries (01 Jun, 2002 03:35 p.m.):
Let me clarify: I'm not suggesting either Pitt or Affleck for the role. I just was making a point about public perception. But, to your point, Pitt is a respectable thespian in my book. I've not seen a lot of his work, but he does deserve credit for actually acting, as opposed to to just "making movies."
David, I didn't think you were making such a suggestion--heaven forbid! That's why I wrote "just for the sake of argument" in my post--to simply point out that Pitt's pretty good at transcending his image. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
#30
Posted 01 June 2002 - 09:26 PM