Which Gardner book should be turned into a movie?
#1
Posted 23 September 2001 - 09:57 PM
Though Special Services would be better as an annivsary movie for Bond 20 since it brings back SPECTRE, Felix Lieter, and introdoces Blofeld's vengeful daughter.
I know it's very unlikely that any Gardners will be used for a future film since elements of his books have already been used throughout the EON series.
#2
Posted 25 September 2001 - 01:05 AM
I also get the impression that EON thinks that Gildrose are stepping on their toes every time a novel is published. EON feels very proprietorial to Bond
#3
Posted 25 September 2001 - 03:23 PM
Plus, a return for many old school favs, such as SPECTRE, Felix Leiter, etc.
AND it has an excellent Fleming-inspired title!
#4
Posted 16 October 2001 - 02:37 AM
Many of them read like unpolished preliminary drafts, much as Fleming's own TMWTGG does.
#5
Posted 25 September 2001 - 03:32 PM
#6
Posted 30 September 2001 - 06:49 PM
#7
Posted 30 September 2001 - 07:32 PM
Failing that what about using No Deals Mr Bond.......some good stuff in there aswell
#8
Posted 30 September 2001 - 07:36 PM
Barebumundermakilt (30 Sep, 2001 08:32 p.m.):
Failing that what about using No Deals Mr Bond.......some good stuff in there aswell
Yeah, I thought No Deals, Mr. Bond was pretty good too. It would be nice to see a Bond film in Ireland plus it could bring SMERSH into the series.
#9
Posted 01 October 2001 - 09:13 PM
RossMan (30 Sep, 2001 07:49 p.m.):
I think that the Man From Barbarossa would make a fine spy movie, but not a Bond movie. It's a great post Cold War espionage thriller but fails in many places as a decent Bond story. Gardner should have wrote this one using his own characters rather than Bond M, etc., it probably would have been more successful then.
I've always wondered whether Gardner started this as a non-Bond novel, and then shoe-horned Bond in to meet Glidrose's deadline for the next 007 book.
#10
Posted 23 September 2001 - 10:45 PM
FOR SPECIAL SERVICES and LICENSE RENEWED are both very adaptable. BROKENCLAW has a good villain and locations... And WIN, LOSE OR DIE has a great set-up (Bond returns to the Royal Navy). These could all work.
#11
Posted 24 September 2001 - 01:01 AM
ALL OF THEM!
#12
Posted 04 November 2001 - 12:48 PM
#13
Posted 04 November 2001 - 01:08 PM
#14
Posted 04 October 2001 - 09:34 PM
White Persian (01 Oct, 2001 10:13 p.m.):
RossMan (30 Sep, 2001 07:49 p.m.):
I think that the Man From Barbarossa would make a fine spy movie, but not a Bond movie. It's a great post Cold War espionage thriller but fails in many places as a decent Bond story. Gardner should have wrote this one using his own characters rather than Bond M, etc., it probably would have been more successful then.
I've always wondered whether Gardner started this as a non-Bond novel, and then shoe-horned Bond in to meet Glidrose's deadline for the next 007 book.
Thats an interesting theory, and one thats quite plausible. John Gardner has been in the wars on several occasions during the years. I remember reading an article about him not so long ago and it stated all the illnesses he has suffered and the numerous cancer scares. His wife died of cancer, and Glidrose used to hound him for his latest book, etc. Poor chap. He even stated that the Bond books were 'something he shouldn't have taken on'.
#15
Posted 05 November 2001 - 11:58 PM
If they ever did No Deals, Mr. Bond they would have to change the title. (James Bond in No Deals, Mr. Bond does not sound quite right.)
#16
Posted 24 September 2001 - 02:24 PM
My favorites is definitely Nobody lives forever (Gardner). Also a good title for a movie, but it's also a major popular game (No one lives forever). So they probably will never use that title.
#17
Posted 24 September 2001 - 07:53 PM
M. (24 Sep, 2001 03:24 p.m.):
I've read all Fleming, Gardner and Benson books.
My favorites is definitely Nobody lives forever (Gardner). Also a good title for a movie, but it's also a major popular game (No one lives forever). So they probably will never use that title.
If they did do a movie of Nobody Lives Forever, they could use Death is Forever (shudder...cringe...) for a title instead, they're pretty much alike.
On the subject of Nobody Lives Forever as a movie, I'm surprised Eon hasn't used that concept of a "headhunt" against Bond yet in the movies. That would make for a great movie!
#19
Posted 24 January 2005 - 03:32 AM
#20
Posted 24 January 2005 - 03:48 AM
#21
Posted 24 January 2005 - 03:49 AM
http://debrief.comma...wtopic=323&st=0
#22
Posted 24 January 2005 - 04:36 AM
#23
Posted 24 January 2005 - 09:13 AM
I'd like to see ICEBREAKER as well. Eon should at least use this title. It's certainly the best title of the Gardner series -- in fact, it's probably the best post-Fleming title of them all (sorry Raymond).
It is a good title - I've always wondered if he took it from Victor Suvorov's controversial WWII 'history' of the same name. Gardner was certainly very familiar with Suvorov's Aquarium, which is the source for all his information on the GRU. I think it's in No Deals, Mr Bond that he quotes "It's a ruble to get in, but two to get out", which is how Aquarium opens, and has characters paraphrasing and even directly quoting that book when explaining the GRU's role, history and workings.
EDIT: Just looked this up, and Suvorov's book seems to have been published in English well after Gardner's Bond novel of the same name. So apologies for slurring John Gardner (but his use of Aquarium is still a little too bald for my liking).
Edited by spynovelfan, 24 January 2005 - 09:59 AM.
#24
Posted 24 January 2005 - 09:23 AM
#25
Posted 24 January 2005 - 10:55 AM
Most of them have pretty reasonable titles and I'd be happy with movies named after any of 'em (except the obvious exceptions of course).
#26
Posted 20 February 2005 - 08:14 PM
#27
Posted 20 February 2005 - 08:32 PM
#28
Posted 05 March 2005 - 04:40 AM
#29
Posted 22 March 2005 - 04:03 PM
#30
Posted 22 March 2005 - 08:07 PM
I've only read one JG book, Scorpius. When I started to read it I thought of it being a film. What is Icebreaker like? I liked the name of that title.
One of the better Gardner novels I'd say. An involved plot with alot of turns, it's hard to say much without spoiling it. Try it out!