Obviously, they've used Craig’s birthday as Bonds...but that is not correct.
It's the date (although not year, obviously!) Casino Royale was published, in fact.
Posted 20 May 2006 - 09:13 PM
Obviously, they've used Craig’s birthday as Bonds...but that is not correct.
Posted 20 May 2006 - 09:19 PM
April 13th? That's my birthday! How about that?Born: West Germany, 13 April 1968.
Educated at the London School of Economics (presumably on the Royal Navy's dime, since we're told he was in the Navy between the ages of 17 and 31).
Much more interesting stuff here, although I'm not sure whether it all hangs together in any remotely plausible way. Anything in particular jumping out at anyone? Anyway, let the discussion of Bond's background begin!
Posted 20 May 2006 - 09:24 PM
Posted 20 May 2006 - 10:48 PM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 12:24 AM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 12:47 AM
So, is anybody finding it slightly easier to believe Craig's Bond served in the Special Forces and did service in Iraq, Bosnia etc. than Brosnan's Bond doing it?
Posted 21 May 2006 - 02:08 AM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 02:26 AM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 02:35 AM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 02:39 AM
Bond served in Iraq during the Gulf War not the current one.I also love the fact that he was involved in Iraq, a hugely unpopular war; Bond the character doesn't give a toss about Hollywood's politics because his job is to kick butt and take names and I love that Eon didn't pander to them.
Posted 21 May 2006 - 06:35 AM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 07:08 AM
According to EON Productions, Pierce Brosnan's James Bond was born on June 5, 1961 so I have no problem with Craig's incarnation being born on April 13, 1968.
Posted 21 May 2006 - 07:55 AM
Actually I thought it was May 6, 1961 - depending on which way you read the date! I personally got the supposed information from the prop that was the medical evaluation of Bond given by Molly Warmflash in TWINE. The date of birth for Bond was listed as 6.5.1961.
According to EON Productions, Pierce Brosnan's James Bond was born on June 5, 1961 so I have no problem with Craig's incarnation being born on April 13, 1968.
Where is this coming from?
Posted 21 May 2006 - 08:01 AM
Actually I thought it was May 6, 1961 - depending on which way you read the date! I personally got the supposed information from the prop that was the medical evaluation of Bond given by Molly Warmflash in TWINE. The date of birth for Bond was listed as 6.5.1961.
According to EON Productions, Pierce Brosnan's James Bond was born on June 5, 1961 so I have no problem with Craig's incarnation being born on April 13, 1968.
Where is this coming from?
Posted 21 May 2006 - 09:37 AM
Bond served in Iraq during the Gulf War not the current one.
I also love the fact that he was involved in Iraq, a hugely unpopular war; Bond the character doesn't give a toss about Hollywood's politics because his job is to kick butt and take names and I love that Eon didn't pander to them.
Posted 21 May 2006 - 09:52 AM
Actually I thought it was May 6, 1961 - depending on which way you read the date! I personally got the supposed information from the prop that was the medical evaluation of Bond given by Molly Warmflash in TWINE. The date of birth for Bond was listed as 6.5.1961.
According to EON Productions, Pierce Brosnan's James Bond was born on June 5, 1961 so I have no problem with Craig's incarnation being born on April 13, 1968.
Where is this coming from?
Posted 21 May 2006 - 09:54 AM
I also love the fact that he was involved in Iraq, a hugely unpopular war
Posted 21 May 2006 - 09:57 AM
Actually I thought it was May 6, 1961 - depending on which way you read the date! I personally got the supposed information from the prop that was the medical evaluation of Bond given by Molly Warmflash in TWINE. The date of birth for Bond was listed as 6.5.1961.
According to EON Productions, Pierce Brosnan's James Bond was born on June 5, 1961 so I have no problem with Craig's incarnation being born on April 13, 1968.
Where is this coming from?
Which would have made him 38.
Posted 21 May 2006 - 09:59 AM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 12:58 PM
Yes, I wish they hadn't given a year for his birth, it brings up all sorts of continuity issues for the trolls to lose their knickers over.
I doubt it'll make it into the film anyway. They're hardly going to openly contradict the previous films to that extent.
Posted 21 May 2006 - 01:00 PM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 01:08 PM
Yes, I wish they hadn't given a year for his birth, it brings up all sorts of continuity issues for the trolls to lose their knickers over.
How? It's a Reboot. There is not continuity to the previous films.
Posted 21 May 2006 - 01:31 PM
Yes, I wish they hadn't given a year for his birth, it brings up all sorts of continuity issues for the trolls to lose their knickers over.
How? It's a Reboot. There is not continuity to the previous films.
Posted 21 May 2006 - 03:57 PM
Yes, I wish they hadn't given a year for his birth, it brings up all sorts of continuity issues for the trolls to lose their knickers over.
How? It's a Reboot. There is not continuity to the previous films.
Absolutely right- and if you look at the discussion above you'll notice that Bond's birthdate has changed for each version so far anyway- the last two were born in 1948 and 1961 separately. Another birthdate changes absolutely nothing.
Posted 21 May 2006 - 05:14 PM
Interesting! I didn't know such wide birthdate variance existed in the films themselves (albeit on props).
Actually I thought it was May 6, 1961 - depending on which way you read the date! I personally got the supposed information from the prop that was the medical evaluation of Bond given by Molly Warmflash in TWINE. The date of birth for Bond was listed as 6.5.1961.
According to EON Productions, Pierce Brosnan's James Bond was born on June 5, 1961 so I have no problem with Craig's incarnation being born on April 13, 1968.
Where is this coming from?
Whereas DaltonBond was born on the 10th of November 1948:
Which makes him two years younger than Dalton. So Craig's Bond is actually one of the few to give his real age!
Posted 21 May 2006 - 05:24 PM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 06:07 PM
I agree wholeheartedly with this. Scorpio's by reputation, are passionate, stubborn, and secretive. Very Bondlike. I thought Fleming may have deliberately placed Bond as one.Well, I'm not an expert on this, but Scorpios are known to be deadly, devious, and HIGHLY sexual (they also project predatory sexual energy). They are scorpions.
Of course, I might be wrong and April 13 is not Pisces, but the next sign. Still, I always though Pearson making Bond a Scorpio was exactly right. Bond is practically the definition of a Scorpio. I believe Fleming was also a Scorpio, wasn't he?
Posted 21 May 2006 - 07:07 PM
Actually I thought it was May 6, 1961 - depending on which way you read the date! I personally got the supposed information from the prop that was the medical evaluation of Bond given by Molly Warmflash in TWINE. The date of birth for Bond was listed as 6.5.1961.
According to EON Productions, Pierce Brosnan's James Bond was born on June 5, 1961 so I have no problem with Craig's incarnation being born on April 13, 1968.
Where is this coming from?
Which would have made him 38.
And 25 (!) in the GoldenEye pre-titles! Bless ya Pierce; you're well preserved, but not that well preserved!
Posted 21 May 2006 - 07:40 PM
Posted 21 May 2006 - 09:41 PM