Posted 17 January 2007 - 04:11 PM
Okay, we're now about half-way into Season 2 and I'm sensitive about avoiding spoilers here.
Not a "big" deal, but it's beginning to feel a bit "off" to me. Maybe it's the nature of a production that is so sharp, so moving, that anything less than that (tho' better than virtually all other options) risks quickly coming up short.
Plot lines are feeling repetitive.
Alan comes across as duplicitous to me. I'm talking about specifically in his relationship w/ Denny. I mean, this is the core of the series, that on which so much otherwise hinges. So that's a place I'd really not muck up. But it's hitting me sorta like, "I disagree w/ you, but I'm not going to take the time to resolve that. I'm simply going to go off and do what I, in my sole, not to be questioned judgment, is right. I have no respect for your point of view" (eg, the "paint ball shooting" case).
Denny certainly doesn't treat Alan that way. I mean, Denny seems to spill out his disagreement w/ Alan on just about everything (ie, "no money in it," or "too liberal"). Yet he repeatedly comes down from "mad cow" influence to focus on the key for Alan (and others), suggest direction, or personally insert himself - because he cares. It seems that Denny understands the bigger picture, friendship and the nature of the longer-term far better and more deeply than Alan (eg, when he gives Paul the hockey tickets after their HUGE argument, the "pretend" comment).
Someone on the radio here locally (Detroit area) said the other day that Boston Legal appears to have "jumped the shark" in Season 3. Again, w/out spoilers, anyone else having that feeling?
Okay, end of venting. Thanks for listening.