Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

The ugliest and the most handsome JB


67 replies to this topic

#31 krypt

krypt

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 320 posts
  • Location:classified

Posted 09 April 2006 - 04:08 AM

Techincally, Woody Allen was Bond's nephew...


True. He was Jimmy Bond. JB. :tup:


Tell me who do you think is the most handsome and attractive JB and the least attractive JB.


The most handsome and attractive "JB": Matt Damon.

The least attractive "JB": Woody Allen.

Edited by krypt, 09 April 2006 - 04:09 AM.


#32 TortillaFactory

TortillaFactory

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1964 posts
  • Location:Deep 13

Posted 09 April 2006 - 05:29 AM

The whole idea of attractiveness is just too damn subjective. Brosnan has model good-looks, but I find Dalton very appealing in a somewhat earthier way. As a young man Moore was very good-looking, as Brosnan was, but also somewhat generic.

Craig, I can't judge. He's intense. I like intense. On va voir.

Connery is Connery. My belief in his attractiveness or not has little to do with it.

#33 Monsieur B

Monsieur B

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 532 posts
  • Location:C'wood, ON, Canada

Posted 09 April 2006 - 05:41 AM

The whole idea of attractiveness is just too damn subjective. Brosnan has model good-looks, but I find Dalton very appealing in a somewhat earthier way. As a young man Moore was very good-looking, as Brosnan was, but also somewhat generic.

Craig, I can't judge. He's intense. I like intense. On va voir.

Connery is Connery. My belief in his attractiveness or not has little to do with it.

What about Laz? :tup:

#34 medrecess

medrecess

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 487 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 05:47 AM

Pierce in goldeneye imo is the best looking among all Bonds.No doubt about that.Roger Moore looked bloated and old in AVTAK.Craig is a ruggedly handsome Bond.Not ugly for sure if someone feels i felt that way.

#35 medrecess

medrecess

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 487 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 06:04 AM

I detect another enormous Craig bashing is imminent.


I dont agree with.Craig is a ruggedly handsome man.No Craig bashing for me.

Honestly, I consider all of the Bonds to be qualified in the looks department.


You may feel that way.

What's the point of this topic?

Daniel Craig has come really high in 2 recent women's polls for sexy men and he came second in a GMTV hunkiest Bond poll.

There are always some women who disslike a man, my mother says Pierce Brosnan is, quote, "slimey and unattractive", she thinks Tim Dalton and Sean Connery were the most handsome Bonds. But there is a wide consensus that Daniel Craig is a hunk whether you agree or not and I believe this thread was started with the intention of stirring arguments - so let me just state that before any break out.


No argument stirring intented.Why wont Daniel Craig score points in a sexy man poll.What do you mean ? Do you think Craig is ugly or you just suppose so and want to justify needlessly.

IMO you think Craig is ugly.

IMO Craig is one of the most attractive Bond.

Daniel Craig is a hunk for me but not for you as you are justifying and not me.

You should stop assuming things.If i started this thread does it mean that i think Craig is unattractive or Brosnan is attractive.

Unless i state something how can you just assume whatever you like ?

Most Attractive- Bronsnan or Connery

Least Attractive- AVTAK's Roger Moore (he just looked so old in that movie)


Agree with you.


What does this topic have to do with CR. Shouldn't it be moved to general Bond discussion?


Exactly, it's a deliberate attempt to start an argument over Daniel Craig's looks, if it wasn't it wouldn't be in this thread which is all about Daniel Craig and Casino Royale - but I actually know a number of women who think he's "hot".


i think Craig is hot and not ugly.You are one of those people who just assume things without checking the facts.IMO you think craig is ugly.

#36 Dr. Noah

Dr. Noah

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1405 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 06:27 AM

Jesus, this is like checking a hockey board and reading "Who's the cutest goalie?" This is fanboy alternate-universe stuff. The James Bond fans have all been replaced by 13 year-old girls!!!

Who gives a crap? Who is going to give a good performance and make me believe he's Bond? I don't how "cute" James Bond is.

#37 Santa

Santa

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6445 posts
  • Location:Valencia

Posted 09 April 2006 - 07:22 AM

It is a bit poo, but strangely I don't object to most attractive Bond girls discussions. Hmmm....

Also the question is not answerable as handsome and attractive are not the same thing.

#38 Pussfeller

Pussfeller

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4089 posts
  • Location:Washington, D.C.

Posted 09 April 2006 - 09:08 AM

That's exactly how I feel. You've got "pretty" Bonds, like Brosnan and Moore, you've got "virile" Bonds, like Connery, Craig, and Lazenby, and then you've got Dalton, who's somewhere in between. I don't think Craig is boyishly handsome, but he's not ugly or repulsive. Even if you ignore his physique, which is his best feature and far superior to any other Bond actor's, he's still an attractive man.

Is this the face of ugly?

Posted Image

How about this?

Posted Image

#39 Peter Guillam 006

Peter Guillam 006

    Midshipman

  • Crew
  • 50 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 09:15 AM

All I know is that Craig has a huge female fan base, and most women I talk to find him sexy. I think for Bond, as long as he is attractive to the ladies, which he is, then we souldn't worry about it any more. Craig haters are just jealous.

#40 Kingdom Come

Kingdom Come

    Discharged

  • Discharged
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3572 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 09:18 AM

Most handsome has to be old Rog.
Least handsome has to be old misery - Connery.

#41 Dr. Noah

Dr. Noah

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1405 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 10:19 AM

Now, which Bond has the dreamiest government assassin eyes?

#42 Jim

Jim

    Commander RNVR

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 14266 posts
  • Location:Oxfordshire

Posted 09 April 2006 - 02:06 PM

Deep, all this, isn't it?

But, true, I probably wouldn't make that sort of comment if it were "which Bond girl is the prettiest" - although I suspect that goes some way to explaining a wider perception of what Bond girls are for.

1. Look pretty
2. There is no 2. 1 was reason enough.

#43 Tarl_Cabot

Tarl_Cabot

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10505 posts
  • Location:The Galaxy of Pleasure

Posted 09 April 2006 - 03:47 PM

I don't think this thread is objectionable...we compare these lads for everything else so why not looks/attractiveness? I think they are all very handsome and attractive otherwise they'd be playing a different role(duh!)!


Connery is the ugliest and Brosnan is the prettiest. Sean has a crueler look, like he'd have had a harder life and had really been forced to survive meaner streets...while Brosnan looks like pampered male model. They ranked 1 and 5(Craig doesn't make the list yet) on my list respectively too I might add. Looks aren't everything. :tup:

#44 kneelbeforezod

kneelbeforezod

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1131 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 09 April 2006 - 03:50 PM

That picture above when Craig was at the press conference is awful I think... whats going on with his eyes? Is it mascara, or eyeliner? Basically he looks heavily made-up, the one thing that Bond CANNOT look! I hope they fired the make up artist. He looks great in most other pics though...

As for whether this thread was designed to trigger more Craig-bashing, I thought so too at first, but then I checked Medrecess's previous posts and they are generally very pro-Craig. So Medrecess is off the hook! :tup:

#45 Dr. Noah

Dr. Noah

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1405 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 05:19 PM

The most popular Bond was bald with rotten teeth, and he was overweight through half of his films. The key was he gave great performances, and used a decent toupee (usually).

#46 Orion

Orion

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1579 posts
  • Location:Great Britain (rule Britania)

Posted 09 April 2006 - 05:21 PM

I'm guessing he looks like that cause Stephen Spielberg didn't Allow the cast to sleep whilst making Munich

#47 Seannery

Seannery

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3440 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 09:56 PM

Craig fans are way too defensive here. He's not ugly at all but probably the least conventionally handsome in the Bondian sense. This is his hurdle to overcome with the general audience. I've seen snipes at him for this in non-Bond sites whenever 007 comes up. And why do males care how Bond looks? Because of identifying with the ultra alpha male NOT wanting to date him. :tup:

Best looking Bond--Brosnan slightly over Connery.

#48 Brix Bond

Brix Bond

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1503 posts
  • Location:Glasgow, Scotland

Posted 09 April 2006 - 11:13 PM

Bond isn't meant to be attractive. cf. Fleming

#49 Seannery

Seannery

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3440 posts

Posted 09 April 2006 - 11:32 PM

Bond isn't meant to be attractive. cf. Fleming


But we are talking about the reality of cinematic Bond.

#50 medrecess

medrecess

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 487 posts

Posted 10 April 2006 - 01:44 PM

The most popular Bond was bald with rotten teeth, and he was overweight through half of his films. The key was he gave great performances, and used a decent toupee (usually).


was he fat and overweight ? how many of you think so ?

I don't think this thread is objectionable...we compare these lads for everything else so why not looks/attractiveness? I think they are all very handsome and attractive otherwise they'd be playing a different role(duh!)!


Connery is the ugliest and Brosnan is the prettiest. Sean has a crueler look, like he'd have had a harder life and had really been forced to survive meaner streets...while Brosnan looks like pampered male model. They ranked 1 and 5(Craig doesn't make the list yet) on my list respectively too I might add. Looks aren't everything. :tup:


We compare these lads for everything so why not looks/attractiveness ?
The first thing you would see in a potential bond is how he looks,whether he is good looking enough,debonair enough.Otherwise a funnyman could be bond.But would anyone accept a Rowan Atkinson as Bond.?

If ten years from now DC goes and search for a new bond begins the first actors who come to your mind would have to fit the Bond description.ie have to be debonair , charming.That is why a lot of you wanted Owen as Bond ,jackman as Bond.

#51 Stephen Spotswood

Stephen Spotswood

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 823 posts

Posted 10 April 2006 - 02:09 PM

I think this thread is pointless. All the Bonds look larger than life. Some were handsome (meaning attractive in a masculine way) others were pretty (attractive in a feminine way). Our own personal preference is based on our own personal history. However, the most effective at playing Bond IMO is Connery/Dalton.

#52 Mister Asterix

Mister Asterix

    Commodore RNVR

  • The Admiralty
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 15519 posts
  • Location:38.6902N - 89.9816W

Posted 10 April 2006 - 02:37 PM


I detect another enormous Craig bashing is imminent.


I dont agree with.Craig is a ruggedly handsome man.No Craig bashing for me.

Honestly, I consider all of the Bonds to be qualified in the looks department.


You may feel that way.

What's the point of this topic?

Daniel Craig has come really high in 2 recent women's polls for sexy men and he came second in a GMTV hunkiest Bond poll.

There are always some women who disslike a man, my mother says Pierce Brosnan is, quote, "slimey and unattractive", she thinks Tim Dalton and Sean Connery were the most handsome Bonds. But there is a wide consensus that Daniel Craig is a hunk whether you agree or not and I believe this thread was started with the intention of stirring arguments - so let me just state that before any break out.


No argument stirring intented.Why wont Daniel Craig score points in a sexy man poll.What do you mean ? Do you think Craig is ugly or you just suppose so and want to justify needlessly.

IMO you think Craig is ugly.

IMO Craig is one of the most attractive Bond.

Daniel Craig is a hunk for me but not for you as you are justifying and not me.

You should stop assuming things.If i started this thread does it mean that i think Craig is unattractive or Brosnan is attractive.

Unless i state something how can you just assume whatever you like ?

Most Attractive- Bronsnan or Connery

Least Attractive- AVTAK's Roger Moore (he just looked so old in that movie)


Agree with you.


What does this topic have to do with CR. Shouldn't it be moved to general Bond discussion?


Exactly, it's a deliberate attempt to start an argument over Daniel Craig's looks, if it wasn't it wouldn't be in this thread which is all about Daniel Craig and Casino Royale - but I actually know a number of women who think he's "hot".


i think Craig is hot and not ugly.You are one of those people who just assume things without checking the facts.IMO you think craig is ugly.



Still, the point is this is a general film discussion. Moving topic now.

#53 spynovelfan

spynovelfan

    Commander CMG

  • Discharged
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5855 posts

Posted 10 April 2006 - 03:18 PM

Bond isn't meant to be attractive. cf. Fleming


Where in Fleming does it say that? Several of the female characters comment that he is attractive. cf. Vesper Lynd, Gala Brand, Honeychile Ryder.

#54 pieffra

pieffra

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 303 posts
  • Location:Rome, Italy

Posted 10 April 2006 - 03:54 PM

The most: Sean Connery
The least: George lazenby

Craig is not so handsome, but he's attractive

#55 Santa

Santa

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6445 posts
  • Location:Valencia

Posted 10 April 2006 - 04:17 PM

We compare these lads for everything so why not looks/attractiveness ?
The first thing you would see in a potential bond is how he looks,whether he is good looking enough,debonair enough.Otherwise a funnyman could be bond.But would anyone accept a Rowan Atkinson as Bond.?



Actually there's something about Rowan Atkinson..... I find him very attractive.

#56 TortillaFactory

TortillaFactory

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1964 posts
  • Location:Deep 13

Posted 10 April 2006 - 04:31 PM

Bond isn't meant to be attractive. cf. Fleming


Er, yes, he is. Tania says he looks like an American movie star.

#57 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 10 April 2006 - 05:53 PM

Bond is described as very good looking in Casino Royale for one.

Pictures speak louder than words.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Oh yes and:

http://i16.photobuck...ozd/pierce2.jpg

Edited by Leon, 10 April 2006 - 06:15 PM.


#58 Santa

Santa

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6445 posts
  • Location:Valencia

Posted 10 April 2006 - 05:54 PM

That's not good. Really not good.

#59 Leon

Leon

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 1574 posts
  • Location:England

Posted 10 April 2006 - 07:40 PM

Here's a little collection of famous shots of each actor as Bond to compare:

http://i16.photobuck..._ozd/6bonds.jpg

#60 Stephen Spotswood

Stephen Spotswood

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 823 posts

Posted 10 April 2006 - 08:01 PM

George Lazenby seems thinner than he was in OHMSS. He was pretty massive in that one. I recognize the picture of Sean Connery where he was a runner up in the Mr. Scotland contest. Craig looks like he'll either be the most muscular Bond, or a close second to the Lazenby I remember.

The only trouble is OHMSS I don't remember Lazenby in anything so revealing.