
Naked Bond!
#31
Posted 28 February 2006 - 12:56 PM
#32
Posted 28 February 2006 - 01:39 PM
I thought Bond should be better hung.
Connery wore a wig, maybe Craig should wear an artificial penis?
#33
Posted 28 February 2006 - 01:41 PM

#34
Posted 28 February 2006 - 03:33 PM
Craig is sure no John Holmes. I thought Bond should be better hung. Another one the press is going to lashes onto...
Do you mean latch onto?
Let's hope the press don't make a grab for Bond's hang-ups.
Anyway, Jinx certainly won't be saying ever again "Now that's a mouthful."

#35
Posted 28 February 2006 - 03:38 PM
Craig is sure no John Holmes. I thought Bond should be better hung. Another one the press is going to lashes onto...
Do you mean latch onto?
Let's hope the press don't make a grab for Bond's hang-ups.
Anyway, Jinx certainly won't be saying ever again "Now that's a mouthful."
Or, ".....something bigs come up"
Oh, god there endless

#36
Posted 28 February 2006 - 03:41 PM
Edited by mario007, 28 February 2006 - 03:41 PM.
#37
Posted 28 February 2006 - 04:35 PM
"No it's just the right size.....for me!!!"
er, maybe not

#38
Posted 28 February 2006 - 04:41 PM
Bond: "In this case, it's just a theory!"

#39
Posted 28 February 2006 - 04:49 PM
Bond: What did you say?
M: ...to support you in the field. He's our man in the Bahamas.
Bond: Oh. I thought you said...
M: No, Double-Oh Seven, do grow up. Just because you've got a tiny todger doesn't mean you should overcompensate!
Bond: Aaaaargh!
#40
Posted 28 February 2006 - 06:21 PM
Bond: "No. It's just a relic of the Cold War!"
#41
Posted 28 February 2006 - 06:46 PM

#42
Posted 01 March 2006 - 12:57 AM
I'm strongly opposed to Daniel Craig being James Bond, and I think he will without question be the worst Bond ever!
However the size of any actors genitals should not even be a topic in regards to their acting!
There are some minors who visit this site, and those photos and links are disgusting!
I was once sent a PM from a moderator who was warning me for the fact that I put "
![[censored]](https://debrief.commanderbond.net/topic/29203-naked-bond/style_emoticons/default/censored.gif)
Can you say HYPOCRITE???
If people want to criticize Daniel Craig's apperance, then criticize is ugly face, because that is something that actually will be seen in the film!
#43
Posted 01 March 2006 - 01:26 AM
Is it just me, or does anyone else find this thread to be EXTREMELY IN POOR TASTE???
I'm strongly opposed to Daniel Craig being James Bond, and I think he will without question be the worst Bond ever!
However the size of any actors genitals should not even be a topic in regards to their acting!
There are some minors who visit this site, and those photos and links are disgusting!
I was once sent a PM from a moderator who was warning me for the fact that I put "'$," That was the exact way that I typed it, and I still got a warning for inappropriate language!?!? And now there is a link to full frontal nude photos and a pørn site, as well as people even using words like d*ck.
Can you say HYPOCRITE???
If people want to criticize Daniel Craig's apperance, then criticize is ugly face, because that is something that actually will be seen in the film!
it's no different than the Eva Greene thread.... however, I do agree with you about your warning....
#44
Posted 01 March 2006 - 01:58 AM
#45
Posted 01 March 2006 - 02:15 AM
BTW, can someone please tell me what he's covered in? It looks like he took a bath in someone's bloody diarrhea or something...
#46
Posted 01 March 2006 - 01:54 PM
I don't think that it's in bad taste, just pointless.Is it just me, or does anyone else find this thread to be EXTREMELY IN POOR TASTE??
#47
Posted 01 March 2006 - 04:41 PM
I must admit, I really don't see why some people are getting so scandalised about this thread. And I mean, for God's sake, if the sight of a man naked is really going to corrupt younger members, then what are those younger members doing watching Bond films full of sex and violence in the first place?

I'm sorry to get annoyed here, but it is getting ridiculous. GROW UP ALREADY!!!!
Or will I be forced to start yet another petition website: www.freedanswilly.com?
That's Mr Malcolm's soapbox done for now. On a different note, I believe that Dan the Man is covered in tomato juice in the photo.

#48
Posted 01 March 2006 - 06:16 PM
Or will I be forced to start yet another petition website: www.freedanswilly.com?
If you believe the tabloids Dan's willy doesn't need freeing. I would suggest it is more than a little liberated already.
Willies and Titties...whatever next?
OK, don't answer that.
Edited by Lappaman, 01 March 2006 - 06:17 PM.
#49
Posted 02 March 2006 - 03:57 AM
A pair of naked breasts and everything's fine. A naked penis (and not an erect one either) and suddenly people are becoming more morally outraged than a Daily Mail reader in a transexual strip-show. Why? Yes, this thread is silly, but no more silly than having one devoted to Eva Green's humps, her humps, her lovely lady lumps.
I must admit, I really don't see why some people are getting so scandalised about this thread. And I mean, for God's sake, if the sight of a man naked is really going to corrupt younger members, then what are those younger members doing watching Bond films full of sex and violence in the first place?(NB: Younger members: I'm not getting at you here!) It's not like the photos show Mr Craig engaging in full-on sex with a pair of bisexual women.
I'm sorry to get annoyed here, but it is getting ridiculous. GROW UP ALREADY!!!!
Or will I be forced to start yet another petition website: www.freedanswilly.com?
First of all, I had not even seen the Eva Green thread when I made my post on this one. Secondly, I agree that the Eva Green one is also inapproprite for this site. Also, the Eva Green thread does not show her vagina, and there is a big difference between breasts and genitals!!! There are also gay-pørn links on this thread.
And I have to ask why a guy would even be searching the internet for naked pictures of DC (or any man for that matter) naked in the first place, that is unless he's....???
If people want to get off on naked pictures they should actually go to that kind of site in the first place!!!
Silly me, I thought James Bond sites were for the purpose of talking about the Bond films, not genitals!?!?
That's Mr Malcolm's soapbox done for now. On a different note, I believe that Dan the Man is covered in tomato juice in the photo.
#50
Posted 02 March 2006 - 04:09 AM
No. I can't look. I can't look at a man naked. What if I liked it?
Don't be goin' all Brokeback on us!
#51
Posted 02 March 2006 - 12:26 PM
#52
Posted 03 March 2006 - 09:00 PM
And I don't want to do it...
I prefer to see Eva...
#53
Posted 04 March 2006 - 04:24 PM

#54
Posted 05 March 2006 - 02:50 PM
They thought all rulers had twelve inches....
Ahthangyow!
