
Naked Bond!
#1
Posted 26 February 2006 - 02:03 AM
#2
Posted 26 February 2006 - 02:54 AM

(but the first set of pics just looks bleh, like he rolled through someones trash, not cute)
#3
Posted 26 February 2006 - 05:19 AM

#4
Posted 26 February 2006 - 05:23 AM
No. I can't look. I can't look at a man naked. What if I liked it?
Do it! I did, and I don't regret a thing. I'm actually pretty sure I've seen more horrible things than Daniel Craig without pants.
#5
Posted 26 February 2006 - 05:26 AM
#6
Posted 26 February 2006 - 05:34 AM
#7
Posted 26 February 2006 - 05:47 AM
#8
Posted 26 February 2006 - 08:32 AM
#9
Posted 26 February 2006 - 08:40 AM
No. I can't look. I can't look at a man naked. What if I liked it?
Hmm. What an odd question. That'd be strange that after all your long years you suddenly turned gay by the sight of Daniel Craig's penis. Just saying... it'd be strange.

#10
Posted 26 February 2006 - 08:44 AM
What is he covered with? It looks like ketchup.
baby food? yuk!

#11
Posted 26 February 2006 - 08:49 AM
#12
Posted 26 February 2006 - 12:50 PM
#13
Posted 26 February 2006 - 04:07 PM
On the topic of the pictures, I'm not too worried about looking at them I mean, I have a penis too so it's nothing that I haven't already seen before. I don't know why some of you are afraid of seeing another man's unmentionables.
#14
Posted 26 February 2006 - 04:20 PM
Ashamed to admit I did look. Also ashamed to admit, I found it interesting, very interesting

Size isn't everything, technique is

Enough said...at least by me.
#15
Posted 26 February 2006 - 08:52 PM
(George Costanza - "The Hamptons" episode)
#16
Posted 27 February 2006 - 01:49 AM
#17
Posted 27 February 2006 - 07:01 AM
And until everyone posts a picture of their junk in this thread I'd prefer not to hear criticism about what Craig is packing.
Am I defending another person's genitals? What a day in history.
#18
Posted 27 February 2006 - 07:21 AM
And until everyone posts a picture of their junk in this thread I'd prefer not to hear criticism about what Craig is packing.

#19
Posted 27 February 2006 - 07:56 AM
As a former female coworker once said: "A small penis can be a big penis erect and vice-a-versa."
Vice-versa?
Really?
Okay, I'm only going to say this once: being that he's a spy and everything, Bond really should be a grow-er, not a show-er.
Now I hate myself. And this thread is so destined for closure.
#20
Posted 27 February 2006 - 10:57 AM
[quote]
Okay, I'm only going to say this once: being that he's a spy and everything, Bond really should be a grow-er, not a show-er.
Now I hate myself. And this thread is so destined for closure.
[/quote]
I'm surprised it's stayed up this long. Dammit, there was just no other way for me to phrase that.
Hey Mods, how about we pull the pin and shut this puppy down? Threads like this just give more ammunition to the anti-Craig brigade.
VM
#21
Posted 27 February 2006 - 11:02 AM
#22
Posted 27 February 2006 - 11:37 AM
#23
Posted 27 February 2006 - 03:07 PM
Besides these picture are freely available all over the web and virtually all actors these days seem to do full frontal scenes in films, I think it's starting to become a normal part of the job.
#25
Posted 27 February 2006 - 04:31 PM
Danny Boy seems fine with parading his giblets otherwise he wouldn't have gone nude. These actors are exhibitionists. Anyway, he certainly won't be the wurst Bond...
But I can't mention the other Bond candidate who was arrested for indecent exposure...and let off for lack of evidence!




![[censored]](https://debrief.commanderbond.net/public/style_emoticons/default/stare.gif)

#26
Posted 27 February 2006 - 04:32 PM
'Bond had always had an incredibly tiny todger.'
Chapter Six, On Her Majesty's Secret Service
#27
Posted 27 February 2006 - 10:23 PM
What the hell were you people expecting, anyway? Dirk Diggler? As has been stated, he's perfectly average.
#28
Posted 28 February 2006 - 12:22 AM

#29
Posted 28 February 2006 - 10:11 AM
VM
#30
Posted 28 February 2006 - 11:17 AM