

Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:07 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:18 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:19 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:25 PM
But remember, this is supposed to be a realistic James Bond. In the real world, a British agent wouldn't have panache and swagger and be debonair....and he would get dirty, and he would come off as a cold person. This is what EON is going for...realistic. However, I think that if they had died his hair black, that would've helped more people accept him.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:26 PM
As much as they keep the same, it's easy to believe they'll mix things up a bit. I mean they have to if they want the series to survive, dont you think?
Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:27 PM
Well, more than that- what's the point in doing something that's been done for 40 years? Just going over the same ground endlessly I would imagine is starting to lose its appeal.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:36 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 05:44 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 06:30 PM
To be fair, I thought Brosnan looked laughable while carrying the swagger with his "Tom Hanks in CAST AWAY" look.Brosnan managed to look swave even with a huge beard and long hair in DAD...
Posted 25 February 2006 - 06:31 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 07:03 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 07:13 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 07:46 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:15 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:18 PM
I'm one of the Bond fans advocating Bond films' going back to basics for years. But this disappoints me. All of you supposed Bond fans who have posted in this thread sloberring over these pix are nothing but Bourne fans in disguise. If I want to see a Bourne flick I go to a Bourne movie. NOT A RIP OFF. These so called "Bond" scenes confirm my fear that the Bond franchise has become a second rate, un-original pretender. Rather than the inventive trail blazers it used to be. And blind followers swallow it all up. Sad day indeed! What a freaking shame!
Edited by Andrew, 25 February 2006 - 08:19 PM.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:26 PM
So Bond is Bourne just because...
Spoiler
TLD must have been a Bourne rip off! I can't believe Bond would wear a leather jacket!!11!!1!
Find some new lines...these "Bourne rip-off" shouts are getting tired.
It's also been awhile since Bond was a "trailblazer", probably since the Connery films.
Edited by Frankie, 25 February 2006 - 08:29 PM.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:27 PM
Please don't post copyrighted images.
That made me think of both Steve McQueen and Sir Sean. Very cool.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:31 PM
I'm one of the Bond fans advocating Bond films' going back to basics for years. But this disappoints me. All of you supposed Bond fans who have posted in this thread sloberring over these pix are nothing but Bourne fans in disguise. If I want to see a Bourne flick I go to a Bourne movie. NOT A RIP OFF. These so called "Bond" scenes confirm my fear that the Bond franchise has become a second rate, un-original pretender. Rather than the inventive trail blazers it used to be. And blind followers swallow it all up. Sad day indeed! What a freaking shame!
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:32 PM
Edited by Leon, 25 February 2006 - 08:34 PM.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:42 PM
So Bond is Bourne just because...Spoiler
TLD must have been a Bourne rip off! I can't believe Bond would wear a leather jacket!!11!!1!
Find some new lines...these "Bourne rip-off" shouts are getting tired.
It's also been awhile since Bond was a "trailblazer", probably since the Connery films.
Bond is now Bourne, because the Bourne franchise is increasingly making money and an upward moving genre. While Bond movies are still making money they are comparatively on the downswing. Yes, they needed a change back to the basics of From Russia With Love and Goldfinger. But with keeping Bond as Bond. Not the down and dirty and t-shirt wearing Bourne imitation. They even hired a short blond gruff guy to play Bond cheaply ripping off (yes, I said it and it's true) the Bourne franchise. It's nothing but a marketing ploy and you are swallowing it hook line and sinker.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:47 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 08:51 PM
But remember, this is supposed to be a realistic James Bond. In the real world, a British agent wouldn't have panache and swagger and be debonair....and he would get dirty, and he would come off as a cold person. This is what EON is going for...realistic. However, I think that if they had died his hair black, that would've helped more people accept him.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 09:10 PM
Please don't post copyrighted images.
That made me think of both Steve McQueen and Sir Sean. Very cool.
Looks to me more and more like we're going to be introduced to a dark, rough Bond, like Indiana Jones or Rambo, then gradually transform to the playboy hero at the end.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 09:13 PM
All of you supposed Bond fans who have posted in this thread sloberring over these pix are nothing but Bourne fans in disguise.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 09:31 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 09:48 PM
Posted 25 February 2006 - 09:56 PM
Just a question. What's with the shirt being buttoned with one little button? Looks a little strange. Other than that, I'm pleased with the pics.
I'm thinking the other buttons broke off during the sequence, notice he's incredibly... worn...
I showed these pics to a couple friends and a couple stated he kinda resembles the main character from Far Cry.heh.. http://www.mobygames...03387078-01.jpg
Posted 25 February 2006 - 10:08 PM
To be fair, I thought Brosnan looked laughable while carrying the swagger with his "Tom Hanks in CAST AWAY" look.
Brosnan managed to look swave even with a huge beard and long hair in DAD...
As some have pointed out, Brosnan's Bond had a sort of fake coolness that I never wanted. I never really wanted to be Brosnan's Bond. But Craig, in all of these photographs, is exuding an incredible sense of cool.
Edited by Emma, 25 February 2006 - 10:10 PM.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 10:15 PM
Some of us actually like Bond and have been following him for a very long time. And it dismays us to see a character we love so much being changed and ruined.
Posted 25 February 2006 - 10:18 PM