

Edited by Stax, 28 December 2005 - 07:54 AM.
Posted 28 December 2005 - 07:52 AM
Edited by Stax, 28 December 2005 - 07:54 AM.
Posted 28 December 2005 - 09:27 AM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 09:46 AM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 11:31 AM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 01:37 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 02:36 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 03:17 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 03:20 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 03:22 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 03:32 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 04:09 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 04:36 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 04:56 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:23 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:23 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:25 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:34 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:45 PM
I have to agree that it doesn't look like he's dyed his hair at all in those shots - simply the non-studio lighting creating an illusion of a darker hue.
Personally, I prefer his hair a little longer than those shots - hope they let it grow a bit more before the cameras start rolling...
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:50 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:51 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:54 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 05:59 PM
Should be darker still IMO
And also longer, IMO. A bit like in SYLVIA:
Craig is a good Bond in that picture...maybe a little more tanning and he'd be perfect.
Posted 28 December 2005 - 06:03 PM
Posted 28 December 2005 - 06:19 PM
at the end of the day, i can't see them allowing Bond to be Blonde. Otherwise they know they REALLY will get backlash then. Because of their choice of actor, they know the film will be watched and critiqued even closer.
He WILL look as Bondian as possible, that IS for sure.
Posted 28 December 2005 - 06:21 PM
Edited by Stax, 28 December 2005 - 06:23 PM.
Posted 28 December 2005 - 06:30 PM