Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

New Equalizer film


66 replies to this topic

#31 TheSaint

TheSaint

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3067 posts
  • Location:Bronx,NY

Posted 27 December 2005 - 06:56 AM

Having worked with Sloan and having taken time to talk to him about the creation of the Equalizer he told me that the show was created for George Lazenby to star in.(who is an old friend of his) As things sometime work out Lazenby was not able to do the show and Woodward was chosen as his replacement. George eventually guest starred in another Sloan creation "The Master".

View Post


"The Master" predated "The Equalizer" by a year so, I guess "The Equalizer" as an idea for a tv series sat on the shelf for a while.

After getting the ROTS Aussie DVD set, I think Ian Ogilvy would make a great new Robert McCall.

#32 dinovelvet

dinovelvet

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8038 posts
  • Location:Jupiter and beyond the infinite

Posted 30 January 2006 - 09:35 AM

January 27, 2006
McGuigan to helm The Equalizer

Paul McGuigan is set to direct The Equalizer for The Weinstein Co. He previously worked with the Weinsteins as he helmed Lucky Number Slevin for their company. The Equalizer is a big-screen adaptation of the television drama that ran from 1985-1989. Edward Woodward starred in the show. The movie will be a contemporary take.

---------

It should be noted that both Clive Owen (Derailed) and Pierce Brosnan (The Matador) both did movies for the Weinstein Company recently. Hmm...! :tup:

#33 stamper

stamper

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2994 posts
  • Location:Under the sea

Posted 30 January 2006 - 11:21 AM

Holy Drokk ! With Laz, the show would have become a true cult to millions of 007 fans. Laz would have been perfect as the bastard who kills all the youngsters because they are drugged and depraved without any morals.

I loved the show, apart from all the episodes where Woodward is missing, or cameos, they are truly boring those made when he was sick.

#34 Lady Rose

Lady Rose

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:London,UK

Posted 30 January 2006 - 05:17 PM

I always enjoyed The Equalizer .... this is good news and very good news that they are keeping it to an older actor. Tim Daltons name keeps getting mentioned with this , which is interesting seeing as McCall has been described as ...

'A cynical, guilt-ridden former secret agent, ROBERT McCALL took an early retirement, disgusted by the treachery and hypocrisy of the profession. '

Sounds like there is place for TD's James Bond after all in the commercial world !! I think Tim would be great in the role. He's the right age and still in good physical shape but I dont know if he has the commercial clout the producers would be looking for.

Laz could carry it off. Brosnan is completely wrong for it and I suspect he would run a mile from doing it anyway. Connery is too old as is Rog. Would casting an ex Bond be a bit twee or clever casting ??? I think it would quite cool. A little audience joke that we all know he is an ex spy.

Other than that Patrick Stewart would be OK.

#35 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 30 January 2006 - 06:04 PM

I always enjoyed The Equalizer .... this is good news and very good news that they are keeping it to an older actor. Tim Daltons name keeps getting mentioned with this , which is interesting seeing as McCall has been described as ...

'A cynical, guilt-ridden former secret agent, ROBERT McCALL took an early retirement, disgusted by the treachery and hypocrisy of the profession. '

Sounds like there is place for TD's James Bond after all in the commercial world !! I think Tim would be great in the role. He's the right age and still in good physical shape but I dont know if he has the commercial clout the producers would be looking for.

View Post


Yeah, he does seem to be a perfect fit for it.

I think they could probably get away with casting him in this. I doubt it's going to be a mega-budget film, anyway. As long as they promote it properly, they'll be onto a winner.

It would certainly put Tim Dalton back on the map, if he's cast in it, that's for sure. :tup:

#36 Lady Rose

Lady Rose

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:London,UK

Posted 30 January 2006 - 06:27 PM

I think The Equalizer will work on the big screen. After all, the series was 20 years ago, so it will be totally new to a younger audience and yet still have something for us oldies. I just hope they stick with the older actor idea because that is the whole premise of The Equalizer - non of this Hollywood updating Thankyou!!!

#37 Tarl_Cabot

Tarl_Cabot

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10505 posts
  • Location:The Galaxy of Pleasure

Posted 30 January 2006 - 06:31 PM

I could see Hollywood hiring Jason Stratham to be Robert Mccall Jr...and have dad make an appearence...Ya know it's on the table! :tup:

#38 Lady Rose

Lady Rose

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:London,UK

Posted 30 January 2006 - 06:39 PM

I could see Hollywood hiring Jason Stratham to be Robert Mccall Jr...and have dad make an appearence...Ya know it's on the table! :D

View Post



NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :tup: :D


I hope not ... Why cant we, just for once, have what we know and love without someone having 'to put their mark on it' ??

The whole thing of the Equalizer is that he is an older ex spy trying to atone for sins of the past ... Dont go there Tarl! And absolutely not with Stratham!

#39 Tarl_Cabot

Tarl_Cabot

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 10505 posts
  • Location:The Galaxy of Pleasure

Posted 30 January 2006 - 08:13 PM

I could see Hollywood hiring Jason Stratham to be Robert Mccall Jr...and have dad make an appearence...Ya know it's on the table! :D

View Post



NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :tup: :D


I hope not ... Why cant we, just for once, have what we know and love without someone having 'to put their mark on it' ??

The whole thing of the Equalizer is that he is an older ex spy trying to atone for sins of the past ... Dont go there Tarl! And absolutely not with Stratham!

View Post


Hey relax...it's not a suggestion but a prediction. :D I want Robert McCall to be at least 50 or older...just like Ed Woodard... :(

But about Stratham: His Trasnporter character is alot like McCall... ex-special ops guy...retired but still getting involved in helping people...

#40 Lady Rose

Lady Rose

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:London,UK

Posted 30 January 2006 - 08:32 PM

I could see Hollywood hiring Jason Stratham to be Robert Mccall Jr...and have dad make an appearence...Ya know it's on the table! :D

View Post



NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :D :D


I hope not ... Why cant we, just for once, have what we know and love without someone having 'to put their mark on it' ??

The whole thing of the Equalizer is that he is an older ex spy trying to atone for sins of the past ... Dont go there Tarl! And absolutely not with Stratham!

View Post


Hey relax...it's not a suggestion but a prediction. :( I want Robert McCall to be at least 50 or older...just like Ed Woodard... [censored]

But about Stratham: His Trasnporter character is alot like McCall... ex-special ops guy...retired but still getting involved in helping people...

View Post


I know ... I'm cool ... its just that is probably what will happen!!!! :tup:

#41 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 30 January 2006 - 09:26 PM

Bleedin' Jason "'ave a break, 'ave a Kit-Kat" Statham, as The Equalizer?

You're 'avin' a larf, ain'tcha?!

#42 Lady Rose

Lady Rose

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:London,UK

Posted 30 January 2006 - 10:04 PM

Bleedin' Jason "'ave a break, 'ave a Kit-Kat" Statham, as The Equalizer?

You're 'avin' a larf, ain'tcha?!

View Post


Yeah ,he must be 'avin' a Turkish and while were at it, lets make it an 18 so the saucepans cant see it! Next you know, me old mate Guy Ritchie will be directin' :tup:

Edited by Lady Rose, 30 January 2006 - 10:06 PM.


#43 Royal Dalton

Royal Dalton

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4542 posts

Posted 30 January 2006 - 10:46 PM

:tup:

Got a problem, 'ave ya?
Need 'elp?
Odds against ya?
Call The Equalizer, me old china.

#44 Seannery

Seannery

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3440 posts

Posted 30 January 2006 - 10:58 PM

They just need to give Edward Woodward a bloody good cameo! That was a fun show.

If they go go younger make it Peter Woodward who has some of the same cool bombastic intensity that his dad does. It would never happen though. :tup:

#45 TheSaint

TheSaint

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3067 posts
  • Location:Bronx,NY

Posted 31 January 2006 - 01:08 AM

I could see Hollywood hiring Jason Stratham to be Robert Mccall Jr...and have dad make an appearence...Ya know it's on the table! :D

View Post


McCall did have a son in the series-Scott, played by William Zabka. I don't see the character of Scott morphing from softie Zabka to hard :tup: Statham, even after 20 years.

While I'm a great fan of Jason's, I can't see him playing Robert McCall.

#46 Bond Bombshell

Bond Bombshell

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 461 posts

Posted 01 February 2006 - 05:15 AM

There is talk of this film turning into a franchise, and if that's true they may decide that anyone over sixty is too old for the long term. That would immediately disqualify a lot of the actors suggested in this thread - Timothy Dalton, Patrick Stewart, Anthony Hopkins, George Lazenby, and Ian McShane. IMO, the best suggestions so far have been Pierce Brosnan 55, Liam Neeson 53, and Sam Neill 58. Brosnan's smoothness and Neeson's towering physique seem not quite right for the role, so at the moment I'm leaning towards Neill. He is an experienced and talented film actor who has never quite managed to reach the top rank, perhaps he deserves this sort of career break.

#47 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 01 February 2006 - 06:29 AM

Having worked with Sloan and having taken time to talk to him about the creation of the Equalizer he told me that the show was created for George Lazenby to star in.(who is an old friend of his) As things sometime work out Lazenby was not able to do the show and Woodward was chosen as his replacement. George eventually guest starred in another Sloan creation "The Master".

View Post


"The Master" predated "The Equalizer" by a year so, I guess "The Equalizer" as an idea for a tv series sat on the shelf for a while.


I remember reading in an interview several years back with the creator of The Equalizer, that Edward Woodward was the original choice for McCall but had to battle a little bit with CBS.

Sorry, I don't buy the Lazenby story.

#48 TheSaint

TheSaint

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3067 posts
  • Location:Bronx,NY

Posted 01 February 2006 - 07:37 AM

I've heard about the Lazenby story before-can't remember where-so I don't think it's purely rumor.

#49 Lady Rose

Lady Rose

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:London,UK

Posted 01 February 2006 - 08:04 AM

There is talk of this film turning into a franchise, and if that's true they may decide that anyone over sixty is too old for the long term. That would immediately disqualify a lot of the actors suggested in this thread - Timothy Dalton, Patrick Stewart, Anthony Hopkins, George Lazenby, and Ian McShane. IMO, the best suggestions so far have been Pierce Brosnan 55, Liam Neeson 53, and Sam Neill 58. Brosnan's smoothness and Neeson's towering physique seem not quite right for the role, so at the moment I'm leaning towards Neill. He is an experienced and talented film actor who has never quite managed to reach the top rank, perhaps he deserves this sort of career break.

View Post



As much as I like Neil, you would have to discount him then for the same reason as the others, age. There is only a year between him and Dalton, who is 59. If they do go down the franchise route, they could well go for a slightly younger, 50 year old actor, which would be a real shame as it would alter the premise of the film.

Then again, you are not talking Bond franchise length. At most you may get two to three films out of this. All the actors above are in good shape and could easily be in it for the duration. Afterall, if Harrison Ford can still contemplate Indiana Jones at 64, age holds no bounds ( especially in a CGI riddled world.)

Brosnan is totally wrong for the part. Too playboy, IMO and too associated with Bond. His Equalizer would come across as Bond and Thomas Crown. Neeson might work.

#50 David Schofield

David Schofield

    Commander

  • Discharged
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3026 posts

Posted 01 February 2006 - 09:54 AM

Having worked with Sloan and having taken time to talk to him about the creation of the Equalizer he told me that the show was created for George Lazenby to star in.(who is an old friend of his) As things sometime work out Lazenby was not able to do the show and Woodward was chosen as his replacement. George eventually guest starred in another Sloan creation "The Master".

View Post


"The Master" predated "The Equalizer" by a year so, I guess "The Equalizer" as an idea for a tv series sat on the shelf for a while.


I remember reading in an interview several years back with the creator of The Equalizer, that Edward Woodward was the original choice for McCall but had to battle a little bit with CBS.

Sorry, I don't buy the Lazenby story.

View Post


For what its worth, last Sunday's "The Times" newspaper carries a profile of Martin Shaw, he of The Professionals fame.

The article states that Shaw turned down the offer to go to the USA in the 80s to be McCall in the Equalizer.

Have no idea how credible this is. Maybe Equalizer fans know more?

#51 TheSaint

TheSaint

    Commander RNR

  • Veterans Reserve
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3067 posts
  • Location:Bronx,NY

Posted 02 February 2006 - 04:18 AM

Never heard the Martin Shaw bit.

#52 Bond Bombshell

Bond Bombshell

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 461 posts

Posted 02 February 2006 - 05:07 AM

As much as I like Neil, you would have to discount him then for the same reason as the others, age. There is only a year between him and Dalton, who is 59. If they do go down the franchise route, they could well go for a slightly younger, 50 year old actor, which would be a real shame as it would alter the premise of the film.

Then again, you are not talking Bond franchise length. At most you may get two to three films out of this. All the actors above are in good shape and could easily be in it for the duration. Afterall, if Harrison Ford can still contemplate Indiana Jones at 64, age holds no bounds ( especially in a CGI riddled world.)

Brosnan is totally wrong for the part. Too playboy, IMO and too associated with Bond. His Equalizer would come across as Bond and Thomas Crown. Neeson might work.

Is Dalton 59? IMDB and my reference books all say he was born in March 1944, which would make him almost 62. Is his age in dispute and could this be one of those classic instances of an actor accidentally losing a couple of years?

I'm guessing that they will cast someone with a view to making a possible three films during a six to ten year spell. I think that they will be reluctant to cast anyone who will be pushing 70 by this time. Let's face it a lot of us will face health problems in our 60s and not all of us will even reach 70.(Apologies for the morbid tone of this post). The original Equalizer series suffered because of its star's health problems and I think Woodward was only about 57 when he started. I would hate to see history repeat itself. However, I completely agree with you, that if the actor cast is too young, then the original spirit is lost. 50 is the lowest age acceptable IMO.

I take your point about Brosnan, although he seems less playboy as he ages. I can still see him being cast because of the lack of alternatives. The trouble is there doesn't appear to be any suitable English tough guy actors in their 50s. Even the actors I've mentioned are two Irishmen and a New Zealander. Perhaps we'll end up with an American in the role.

D.Schofield,

I too have read this story about Martin Shaw on a number of occasions. It seems odd as he would have been so much younger than Edward Woodward at the time, i.e. only about 41. He is said to have turned the job down, not wanting to commit himself to an action series, after hating the experience on The Professionals. I'm not sure how true this is though. Ironically, Woodward went the reverse route and was cast as the boss in The New Professionals after The Equalizer. He got that job after his Who Dares Wins co-star and original Professional, Lewis Collins, declined the role. Perhaps the lesson from all this is if a former Professional turns down a role, send for Woodward!

#53 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 02 February 2006 - 07:00 AM

Anthony Hopkins might be able to pull it off, but my top choice would still be Patrick Stewart. He has the intensity that is needed for the role (Brosnan certainly does not) and if every Star Trek geek went to go see it, that would be pretty good box office.

#54 Lady Rose

Lady Rose

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:London,UK

Posted 02 February 2006 - 10:47 AM

Is Dalton 59? IMDB and my reference books all say he was born in March 1944, which would make him almost 62. Is his age in dispute and could this be one of those classic instances of an actor accidentally losing a couple of years?


It is officially 1946, though there are some on here that claim to have seen documentary evidence to the contrary. I, on the other hand, know people who claim to have documentary evidence confirming it is '46 :D and on most sites and references it is given as 1946. Reading some of his very early interviews and stuff seem to indicate '46 is the correct year because when he talks about being a certain age for things the numbers generally add up. Also, he never strikes me as a guy who would give a monkeys about his age. But, you never know, so take your pick.

D.Schofield,

I too have read this story about Martin Shaw on a number of occasions. It seems odd as he would have been so much younger than Edward Woodward at the time, i.e. only about 41. He is said to have turned the job down, not wanting to commit himself to an action series, after hating the experience on The Professionals. I'm not sure how true this is though. Ironically, Woodward went the reverse route and was cast as the boss in The New Professionals after The Equalizer. He got that job after his Who Dares Wins co-star and original Professional, Lewis Collins, declined the role. Perhaps the lesson from all this is if a former Professional turns down a role, send for Woodward!


It occurred to me last night that they should ask Martin Shaw to do it again.
Havind checked on his age. He is now 60/1 but looks in fabulous shape. Then again, whats Lewis Collins up to these days?

N.B. ... I remember Tim Dalton as Heathcliff, Martin Shaw as Doyle, Sam Neill as Reilly. All my favourite actors are getting older. Does this mean that I am to ??? :tup: :D :D

Edited by Lady Rose, 02 February 2006 - 10:59 AM.


#55 templer1972

templer1972

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 266 posts

Posted 02 February 2006 - 11:25 AM

I think Anthony Hopkins will nabbed the role.

I would prefer someone like Daniel Day Lewis to play McCall

#56 Bond Bombshell

Bond Bombshell

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 461 posts

Posted 03 February 2006 - 03:54 AM

It occurred to me last night that they should ask Martin Shaw to do it again.
Havind checked on his age. He is now 60/1 but looks in fabulous shape. Then again, whats Lewis Collins up to these days?

N.B. ... I remember Tim Dalton as Heathcliff, Martin Shaw as Doyle, Sam Neill as Reilly. All my favourite actors are getting older. Does this mean that I am to ??? :tup: :D :D

Thank you for clearing up Dalton's age for me. I am now happy to add his name to that of Brosnan, Neeson, and Neill as a good choice for the role. Funnily enough, I had exactly the same idea last night about Martin Shaw doing the film. In fact, I'd rather see him cast than anybody else mentioned so far. Looking at the current series of Judge John Deed, he seems to have the secret of staying young. The problem is, of course, is that he has no Hollywood profile. Also, he is known to be a bit sniffy about action roles and I wouldn't put it past him to turn down a big film break!

Sadly, Lewis Collins doesn't seem to do much acting these days, apart from his appearance in The Bill a couple of years back - a shame really, as he was a big childhood hero of mine. It seems like only yesterday that I was watching those characters you mention. Time goes by much too fast!

#57 jaguar007

jaguar007

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5608 posts
  • Location:Portland OR

Posted 03 February 2006 - 04:07 AM

What about Connery as Mc Call???

Sure- he is OLDER than Woodward, but he can still pull off an action movie.

#58 Bond Bombshell

Bond Bombshell

    Sub-Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • Pip
  • 461 posts

Posted 03 February 2006 - 05:34 AM

Dear old Sean is 75. If it is true that the producers have franchise ambitions, I can't see them casting him at this age. I don't think Sean would be too keen to accept either. I think that he's earned the right to sit there in his kilt and slippers and take it easy from now on.

I think that Anthony Hopkins is getting a bit long in the tooth for this as well. Its a pity because both would have been excellent in their younger days.

#59 Stephen Spotswood

Stephen Spotswood

    Lieutenant

  • Crew
  • PipPip
  • 823 posts

Posted 22 February 2006 - 05:45 PM

I remember hearing how a British poll in 1986 named Lewis Collins as the Bond of choice. He's the equivalent of todays Clive Owens. Of course another possiblity would be Ben Cross.

I'm surprised no one suggested Jason Connery, because they always seem to be out there rooting for a family franchise. He's certainly not my choice.

I'm still holding out for Dalton.

#60 lsallen

lsallen

    Recruit

  • Crew
  • 1 posts

Posted 06 March 2006 - 07:27 AM

I can see three alternatives:

1. Patrick Stewart. 'Nuff Said.
2. Let George Lazenby do it (if he is willing), in deference to Michael Sloan's original intent and since I believe he will be involved with the film.
3. The alternative that I think is most interesting -- Develop the film with a "passing the torch to a new Equalizer" theme as mentioned earlier, and cast Edward Woodward's son, Peter Woodward, in the role. that would be cool, and if you have seen Peter Woodward work (Galen on Babylon 5, among other roles), you know that his father's style is quite visible in his style.