
Clive Owen Sex Appeal?
#31
Posted 11 November 2004 - 07:09 PM
#32
Posted 11 November 2004 - 07:42 PM
#33
Posted 11 November 2004 - 08:37 PM
I asked my wife a while back what she thought of Owen and she was surprised he was being considered as Bond. Of course, the film I showed her was The Bourne Identity, not his most glamorous role.
I think Owen's look is fine. If you want to go back to Fleming, James Bond was not the drop-dead gorgeous male model we get in the films. He was described as a good-looking man, but not pretty. He is compared with Hoagy Carmichael. I've seen Hoagy Carmichael, who I don't consider a very good-looking guy.
Like Roger Moore says, Bond should not be somebody everybody knows when he walks into a room. A handsome but not too handsome guy would be the answer and Owen fits the bill nicely. Everything else seems like it would fill into place from there.
Turn makes a lot of good points. The Bourne Identity was my first look at Clive Owen and I though that it was a joke to even consider him as Bond. After viewing the BMW movies I had a complete change of mind. They are a much better gauge of his 007 potential.
Also, I agree that Bond needs to be a good looking man, not a beautiful man. Pierce Brosnan "looks" like Bond to me, but thats because he did a great job of acting the part, IMO. Just glancing physically at Pierce however, he can be easily seen as "too pretty" for Bond. Clive Owen is not a showstopper to look at. He won't be the first guy you notice in a room. That is what Bond should be.
#34
Posted 11 November 2004 - 08:45 PM
#35
Posted 12 November 2004 - 01:52 AM
He still reminds me of Nemo with Acne scars. I'm not a woman but he just doesn't look like female fantasy material too me. He looks serious and soulful and the sort of guy who's shoulder you might want to cry on, but nothing about him strikes me as "Fit". O.K. he can take a moody publicity shot, but he can't seem to repeat that in his performances. His moody comes over as "concerned", and I'm sure he is a great dad.
That's not Bond! Bond is "The good looking bastard", that women know they shouldn't get emotionally mixed up with but think, " what the hell, I never said I wanted to marry him!"
#36
Posted 12 November 2004 - 03:35 AM
Also, I agree that Bond needs to be a good looking man, not a beautiful man. Pierce Brosnan "looks" like Bond to me, but thats because he did a great job of acting the part, IMO. Just glancing physically at Pierce however, he can be easily seen as "too pretty" for Bond.
That's a good point. By the same token, though, isn't it also possible that Owen-spindly and jug-eared though he may be-could, through similar qualities of performance, come across as more desirable than his looks would at first indicate?
I was rereading Adrian Turner's Bloomsbury Movie Guide on Goldfinger, and the section about the lambasting Sean Connery originally got from the British press in 1962 suggests that a beefy Scotsman who had more hair on his back than on his head was not anybody's original conception of an ideal Bond. This perception, however, changed very quickly once Dr. No was released, in no small part because of Connery's unearthly self-assurance and charisma.
I think Owen is a real contender because what he lacks in external beauty he makes up for in je ne sais quoi, and I imagine the other people who are plumping for him might agree.
#37
Posted 12 November 2004 - 05:22 AM
#38
Posted 12 November 2004 - 12:20 PM
Exactly! Bond should be fantasy. Owen is reality. I'll bet there are thousands of women who find him attractive, but he's just not that female sex fantasy made flesh Connery brought out so well. And Connery wasn't even conventionally handsome. He had the charisma Owen just lacks. I love Owen as an actor and I'll watch every one of his films, but I just can't see him as Bond. He's too much of a departure from the previous Bond actors.Bond is "The good looking bastard", that women know they shouldn't get emotionally mixed up with but think, " what the hell, I never said I wanted to marry him!"
#39
Posted 12 November 2004 - 01:31 PM
We're never going to get another Connery, just as we're never going to get another Fleming. I have the feeling, crash, that if you'd been Albert R. Broccoli you wouldn't have hired Moore or Dalton.
But I guess this discussion of Owen may well be "academic". I seem to remember a claim in the British tabloid the News of the World a while back to the effect that Sony wants to revamp James Bond as a young, "modern" action hero capable of competing with the likes of SPIDER-MAN and THE MATRIX. If that's true, then Owen wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell, but then neither would anyone apart from, presumably, the likes of Bloom and Farrell.
My top five candidates right now:
Clive Owen
Jack Davenport
Hugh Grant
James Purefoy
Colin Firth
#40
Posted 13 November 2004 - 07:15 PM
The Bond series as a whole would benefit from a more serious Bond, like Owen would bring.
#41
Posted 13 November 2004 - 07:30 PM
If sony decides to create even more of a superhero Bond, then the series truly is dead. I loved Brosnan, but if his action packed films weren't enough to make Bond a true action hero, then I don't want to see what Sony has in mind.
The Bond series as a whole would benefit from a more serious Bond, like Owen would bring.
Well as a laugh, Bourne films, first one Bourne Identity had Clive Owen in it, and the Bond people will be wanting to rival that film series, snatch Clive Owen, there'll be a link.

My choices for Bond:
Hugh Jackman
Clive Owen
Christian Bale-batman now, but still good conteder.
Dougary Scott-got some fire in him, menacing.
These four, I wouldn't mind.
#42
Posted 13 November 2004 - 11:37 PM
Just because Bond doesn't look attractive to the viewer, doesn't mean Bond isn't attractive to the girl pursuing him.
#43
Posted 14 November 2004 - 02:27 AM
#44
Posted 14 November 2004 - 05:52 AM
Owen doesn't have those "knockout" good looks like the previous Bonds had (with the exception being Dalton). He has more of a "manly man" look to him. Really burly, and rough, but could come off as suave, and passionate.
Just because Bond doesn't look attractive to the viewer, doesn't mean Bond isn't attractive to the girl pursuing him.
Ironically enough I started this thread after viewing that trailer.
#45
Posted 14 November 2004 - 06:20 AM
Owen doesn't have those "knockout" good looks like the previous Bonds had (with the exception being Dalton). He has more of a "manly man" look to him. Really burly, and rough, but could come off as suave, and passionate.
Just because Bond doesn't look attractive to the viewer, doesn't mean Bond isn't attractive to the girl pursuing him.
Ironically enough I started this thread after viewing that trailer.
I think you quoted the wrong person, RevolveR.

#46
Posted 14 November 2004 - 06:34 AM
