Julian McMahon next in line to play James Bond?
#1
Posted 17 August 2004 - 10:30 AM
#2
Posted 17 August 2004 - 10:58 AM
Not seen anything else he's done.
He is male, 6ft and black hair, so fits the criteria for all the other rumoured names.
#3
Posted 17 August 2004 - 11:23 AM
His name was bandied about a few weeks back in a promotional story that ran just about everywhere. I doubt this extends beyond that. Brace yourself for another false Bana-esque media blowout.
#4
Posted 17 August 2004 - 11:29 AM
#5
Posted 17 August 2004 - 11:29 AM
#6
Posted 17 August 2004 - 11:51 AM
#7
Posted 17 August 2004 - 12:00 PM
Might be a result of Michael Madsen's earlier coment that they hired a young unknown Australian.It is interesting the sheer volume of Australians who are being linked with the role.
How many "young unknown Australians" do we have on this board alone? .... Good. Out of the door. Line on the left. One rumour each.
#8
Posted 17 August 2004 - 12:04 PM
Then I rather take Adrian Paul than him. UGH!
Not a James Bond
#9
Posted 17 August 2004 - 12:19 PM
#10
Posted 17 August 2004 - 01:36 PM
NEXT!!
#11
Posted 17 August 2004 - 01:39 PM
McMahon has the look, is built and charming as hell. He has a huge female following and he is manly in Connery way. Maybe not the ideal candidate for Bond, but much more convincing than an Eric Bana.
#12
Posted 17 August 2004 - 01:55 PM
#13
Posted 17 August 2004 - 01:57 PM
His name was mentioned a little while ago, now it seems they're back again to take another shot at moving his name around. The rumors never stop.
#14
Posted 17 August 2004 - 02:08 PM
#15
Posted 17 August 2004 - 02:12 PM
Check out Connery's eyebrows in Doctor No.Not with those eyebrows!
Anyway, said my piece back when this rumor surfaced about three/four weeks ago. Think McMahon would be a fine Bond. He carries himself well, can be charming one moment and cad the next. One thing about Bond you have to believe that he could kiss a woman one second and then kill her in the next second. That's a fine edge to walk, Connery had it, Brosnan to some lesser degree, Dalton definitely, Roger came up short however. McMahon, from his Nip/Tuck performance is right in sync with that. Very good actor, would be a fun a Bond.
#16
Posted 17 August 2004 - 02:49 PM
#17
Posted 17 August 2004 - 02:50 PM
#18
Posted 17 August 2004 - 02:57 PM
Yes, evidently. How does Moriarty know this? Any well-connected CBners aware of a meeting today between Babs and McMahon and/or other actors? Or is this just a figure of speech on Moriarty's part, a way of painting a picture of a hunt for Bond #6 that's underway?
And why does Moriarty cover himself by stating something like "of course, none of this means that McMahon's got the part"?
#19
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:06 PM
Hey, MGM peepers! *middle finger*
If anyone wants me I'll be hanging with Kevin McClory.
#20
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:29 PM
#21
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:32 PM
Because some people who worship that site will forgive him. Anybody remember when they actually nailed stuff rather than tossing a bunch of rumours out there like that?And why does Moriarty cover himself by stating something like "of course, none of this means that McMahon's got the part"?
#22
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:36 PM
I feel much the same that I did about Bana, which is that he is capable of doing the role, but has some major issues to overcome. I do like McMahon better than Bana because I think he could play "suave" better. (It's interesting to note that he is the son of the former Prime Minister of Australia, so he should be plenty familiar with international intrigue already.) And I like him better than Purefoy, because at least McMahon wouldn't be dull; he is quite charismatic.
I could definitely accept it. However, there are other folks I like more. I am not getting why it has to be an Australian.
Edited by Spoon, 17 August 2004 - 03:37 PM.
#23
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:47 PM
Anywho... what irks me about all these rumored Bond #6's (including this Julian McYaddaYadda) is that they do NOT have the bond look... facial wise (Jackman is the closest out of all the rumored men). ARH!
#24
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:49 PM
It's just where the focus has been lying often for these rumors.I could definitely accept it. However, there are other folks I like more. I am not getting why it has to be an Australian.
And just look at the credibility of these rumors.
#25
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:52 PM
Still he has a shot compared to other candidates he's unknown (and cheap) and younger, so maybe?
Or its just another rumour, probably
#26
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:55 PM
#27
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:56 PM
#28
Posted 17 August 2004 - 03:58 PM
Yeah, you gotta mention his role on Nip/Tuck. He's a great actor in it.He's currently in Nip/Tuck on Channel 4 (UK)
#29
Posted 17 August 2004 - 04:04 PM
I will try to find the picture.
#30
Posted 17 August 2004 - 04:05 PM

