Time for a new M? If so, who?
#31
Posted 27 May 2002 - 09:51 PM
~Harmsway
#32
Posted 27 May 2002 - 11:18 PM
Jim (27 May, 2002 05:41 p.m.):
Give the job to Timothy Dalton and let everyone's head spin off
Let's watch your head spin off:
I think Dalton would be perfect as M. I'd pay money to see Brosnan take orders from him.
-- Xenobia
#33
Posted 28 May 2002 - 12:12 AM
Tanner is a fleming character and, in the books, is Bonds closest friend in the security services.
its as bad as having monypenny becoming a field operative, or bond becoming a "captain" (a la Gardner).
M and Q are titles...whereas Bond, Moneypenny and Tanner are Fleming characters of a specific age range and should always remain so.
#34
Posted 28 May 2002 - 03:42 AM
Anyway, Hopkins is the head of the CIA or something and one of his lines has that 'snort' sound that Lee had--know what I mean? And he looks the part: old man.
But Dame Judi is excellent, and after Lee, another man is just not as interesting. Not that Brown was bad.
#35
Posted 28 May 2002 - 05:09 AM
Xenobia (28 May, 2002 12:18 a.m.):
Jim (27 May, 2002 05:41 p.m.):
Give the job to Timothy Dalton and let everyone's head spin off
Let's watch your head spin off:
I think Dalton would be perfect as M. I'd pay money to see Brosnan take orders from him.
-- Xenobia
(sound of head spinning off and hitting keyboard)
ierfhkgkkjge93mnge ilh 6eam
#36
Posted 28 May 2002 - 05:54 AM
General Koskov (28 May, 2002 04:42 a.m.):
Anthony Hopkins! Watched the tv spot for...uh the film about the bloke who's twin brother was in the CIA, and they hire him? ???
Anyway, Hopkins is the head of the CIA or something and one of his lines has that 'snort' sound that Lee had--know what I mean? And he looks the part: old man.
But Dame Judi is excellent, and after Lee, another man is just not as interesting. Not that Brown was bad.
Hmmm. . .I think Anthony Hopkins might be a little out of EON's price range. He's also still starring in movies or at least appearing in hefty supporting roles, so I doubt he'd be interested in spending two or three minutes as M--and all the Tony Hopkins fans out there (there are plenty of 'em) might be disappointed by his small part. They might have to turn M into a major character if they got Hopkins for the part.
BTW, General, the movie you're thinking of is Bad Company. Has anyone else noticed the blatant ripoff of Thunderball that appears in BC's trailer and TV commercial? A beautiful woman is emerging from the shower and she asks Chris Rock to hand her something to cover herself with. Chris responds by holding up a tiny hand towel. Markedly similar to the scene where Bond finds Fiona in his bath and when she asks for something to put on he tosses her a pair of shoes. And who says Hollywood is out of fresh ideas?
#37
Posted 28 May 2002 - 08:37 PM
#38
Posted 29 May 2002 - 01:27 AM
Jim (28 May, 2002 06:09 a.m.):
Xenobia (28 May, 2002 12:18 a.m.):
Jim (27 May, 2002 05:41 p.m.):
Give the job to Timothy Dalton and let everyone's head spin off
Let's watch your head spin off:
I think Dalton would be perfect as M. I'd pay money to see Brosnan take orders from him.
-- Xenobia
(sound of head spinning off and hitting keyboard)
ierfhkgkkjge93mnge ilh 6eam
::Jumps up and pumps fist in the air:: YES! Mission accomplished!
::pauses:: Oh wait...who will help with the baby? Oops! :-)
-- Xenobia
#39
Posted 29 May 2002 - 01:53 AM
Hardyboy (28 May, 2002 06:54 a.m.):
And who says Hollywood is out of fresh ideas?
I do! I hated that bit, I mean it was funny, but the fact that Bond did it just ruined the whole thing.
-Does it play DVDs?
-Yes Chris, the Thunderball DVD is in there right no. Care to steal some more sequences?
If Bond wasn't so famous, I'd say the writer might not have known of that scene (though how it would have got past the producers, directors, actors, I've no clue). I once wrote a PTS where Bond blows up a train by lighting a trail of petrol from a leaking tanker car--didn't realise Die Hard 2 had this!
#40
Posted 18 May 2002 - 03:34 PM
#41
Posted 19 May 2002 - 04:35 AM
Anyway. . .I've been mulling this over, and I think I need to step outside the box. When I made some suggestions for a potential new M, I was really thinking of an M on the lines of Bernard Lee or Robert Brown, forgetting that Judi Dench changed everything. The fact she's become M means that the original has retired (as in the current series of novels) or died, so I guess ANYONE could be a potential M. . .Tanner, Robinson, it's all up in the air. But, still, why call the head of the SIS M now? M was never a general title--it's the initial of Admiral Sir Miles Messervy and his use of the initial dates to the Cold War era, when the identity of the SIS head was supposed to be such a closely guarded secret not even his own agents knew who he was. The Secret Service today is far more open--the head can use his or her own name.
#42
Posted 18 May 2002 - 09:31 PM
#43
Posted 20 May 2002 - 05:22 AM
Plus, it gives Pierce more juicy acting to do. The M that he's finally begun to accept and respect, even though she's a woman and all that, is snatched away, possibly before his eyes. Maybe it'll even be his fault; that'd be good. Who knows, but I don't mind the idea.
#44
Posted 21 May 2002 - 12:35 AM
But Dame Judi Dench's M has been refreshing, adding a unigue element to the series, and continuity with Bronsnan's Bond. But when she goes, I just hope the M role is not focused too seriously upon, M should be less visable, villians and Bond should always stand out, Renard for example in TWINE could of done with more scenes of menace rather then extending M's role a bit.
#45
Posted 19 May 2002 - 03:49 AM
#46
Posted 19 May 2002 - 12:58 AM
#47
Posted 20 May 2002 - 05:35 AM
This is like someone in May of '69 saying:
SpoilerAnd that's why Tracy might not be in Diamonds Are Forever.
Now I know you said it might be a rumour, but still...I'd rather not know [cuss] about Die Another Day!
PS. No offense, I just hate thinking I'm reading a 'spoiler-safe' thread and then getting a huge lead on the plot.
#48
Posted 20 May 2002 - 06:31 AM
Sorry about that, GK.General Koskov (20 May, 2002 06:37 a.m.):
Now I know you said it might be a rumour, but still...I'd rather not know [cuss] about Die Another Day!
PS. No offense, I just hate thinking I'm reading a 'spoiler-safe' thread and then getting a huge lead on the plot.
We staff members try to keep on top of unsuspecting spoilers suddenly appearing, but the old couple may fall through the cracks.
Everyone just needs to be mindful of others when posting any information that they read previously in a thread that had a spoiler warning attached.
#49
Posted 20 May 2002 - 06:16 PM
#50
Posted 20 May 2002 - 05:33 PM
#51
Posted 20 May 2002 - 09:07 AM
Brian Cox is an interesting choice, one I hadn't thought of.
Edward Woodwood is just too smarmy and all-knowing smiles. He was the chief in the New Professionals a few years ago and I just wished one of his agents would take a pop at him all the way through.
I don't know how he looks these days but Robert Hardy is Bernard Lee-ish in approach. He was in All Creatures Great and Small.
#52
Posted 20 May 2002 - 12:24 PM
Simon (20 May, 2002 10:07 a.m.):
I don't know how he looks these days but Robert Hardy is Bernard Lee-ish in approach. He was in All Creatures Great and Small.
Simon, this is exactly what i've been trawling through this topic to say!
Hardy had a cameo in the recent bbc version of The Lost World, and hasn't changed greatly since All Creatures Great and Small all those years ago.
I think he'd be a wonderful crusty no- nonsense M, just as Bernard Lee was in Dr No and FRWL.
#53
Posted 20 June 2002 - 07:27 AM
Please tell me that's not true...
#54
Posted 20 June 2002 - 01:37 PM