
Connery Vs. Cubby
#1
Posted 20 May 2004 - 12:17 AM
#2
Posted 20 May 2004 - 12:19 AM
#3
Posted 20 May 2004 - 12:21 AM

#4
Posted 20 May 2004 - 12:32 AM
But really, they didn't eye to eye on things
#5
Posted 20 May 2004 - 12:32 AM
#6
Posted 20 May 2004 - 12:42 AM
... and don't forget to mention that it was all about moneymoneymoney.Money, money, compensation, and oh yeah, money.
Another factor also may have played a small role: ego, ego, ego.
#7
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:17 AM
Plus there were the merciless crowds following him everywhere and the press always wanting something from him. But in all fairness, and it's on the making of YOLT on the DVD, Cubby seemed to come off pretty well in handling the Japanese press and defending Connery at the beginning of filming.
His decision to do DAF, was almost purely a $ decision.
#8
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:19 AM
#9
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:31 AM
#10
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:33 AM
I'd lend my support to that suggestion. Of course, money is always one of the key factors in many celebrity disputes, but I'm sure Connery's occasional aggitation with the role also played into it.Is it really that simple? Has it always been a dispute over money? No one believes that Sean Connery's boredom with the James Bond role had a little bit to do with it? That he was tired of the whole James Bond thing and wanted to do something else? Did Sean Connery also personally dislike Cubby Broccoli and Harry Saltzman in addition to feeling exploited by them and under paid?
#11
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:49 AM
#12
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:50 AM
#13
Posted 20 May 2004 - 05:49 AM
Is that the one where he donates all the money to start that "Scottish Trust" thingy?His decision to do DAF, was almost purely a $ decision.
#15
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:13 PM
Since that is where he supposedly sent that money, then, yes I would cosider that a purely $ decision. That' wasn't meant to be said in a negative way, but it wasn't like he was doing it for free. He compensated nicely out of it as well.Is that the one where he donates all the money to start that "Scottish Trust" thingy?His decision to do DAF, was almost purely a $ decision.
#16
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:40 PM
#17
Posted 20 May 2004 - 01:43 PM
#18
Posted 20 May 2004 - 05:37 PM
#19
Posted 20 May 2004 - 06:56 PM
#20
Posted 20 May 2004 - 06:57 PM
#21
Posted 20 May 2004 - 07:00 PM
#22
Posted 20 May 2004 - 07:02 PM
#23
Posted 20 May 2004 - 07:04 PM
#24
Posted 20 May 2004 - 08:11 PM
Actually, that's a very good point. There were big stars back then, John Wayne and people like that, but they were under contract under the studio system anyway, so they got paid for several films they made a year, some of which did well and others that didn't.Perhaps he was jesting a tad but the problems between him and the Broccoli's were inevitable as this was the 60s and really the Bond films were the first so called blockbusters and a lot was at steak - I think I'm loosing my point here -.... *_*
The Bonds set a new standard for blockbusters as the studio system was fading away. The films also set a new marketing trend, where Connery's image was being used on numerous product tie-ins, but he wasn't making any money from it. None of this had entered in before, and this was probably another sticking point for Connery in wanting to be a partner, so he could also share in things such as that where otherwise he couldn't.
#25
Posted 20 May 2004 - 09:13 PM
#26
Posted 20 May 2004 - 10:17 PM
#27
Posted 20 May 2004 - 11:16 PM
#28
Posted 20 May 2004 - 11:58 PM
#29
Posted 21 May 2004 - 12:58 AM
Sean Connery's penchant for suing studios probably comes from his working-class background. He'd sooner be damned than let execs in high-dollar suits sitting in plush offices not comspensate him as was agreed upon (or, at least, fair compensation in his mind).
#30
Posted 21 May 2004 - 10:10 AM
However.....
I also think that, like Brosnan, Connery had genuine concern for the artistic side of what he was doing and felt that Thunderball and YOLT were veering off in a direction he didn't like, quite ironic given what followed immediately after he left (OHMSS and all it's humbleness). To me Connery looked like he was trying to be more serious with his facial expression in YOLT to combat his dislike for the va va voom gadget emphasis, but only ended up looking bored. By DAF he seemed to pretty much have given up caring about Bond's spy integrity, turning up on set only to take money, film a few Mankiwiz (can't spell the name) gags, and take up the opportunity to wear a few smart tux's in the process.
If he ever saw the script for LALD before he was officially confirmed as having left, I doubt he would seen much on it to excite him.