Good. Bring on Owen.Mr Jackman seems to have his schedulle full for the next couple of years...
![]()
![Photo](http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/f8453ba47d894611dd0e689c0e1ccd2d?s=100&d=http%3A%2F%2Fdebrief.commanderbond.net%2Fpublic%2Fstyle_images%2Fmaster%2Fprofile%2Fdefault_large.png)
Owen Versus Jackman
#151
Posted 09 August 2004 - 10:41 PM
#152
Posted 09 August 2004 - 10:45 PM
#153
Posted 09 August 2004 - 10:51 PM
i will go see it because its bond BUT i would enjoy it far more if brosnan would be the starGiving rise to the question, are you a Bond fan or Brosnan fan. Or a Bond fan because Brosnan is in it?
Whilst this is true, are you not going to give Bond 21 a go if Pierce Brosnan isn't in it?no matter what way they go someone going to be unhappy
if someone else is playing the part of bond and i dont care for them i will just like it less is all
#154
Posted 09 August 2004 - 10:58 PM
Looks like Owen's busy, too. According to imdb (not the most reliable of sources) Derailed is due to start shooting this autumn.Good. Bring on Owen.Mr Jackman seems to have his schedulle full for the next couple of years...
![]()
James Purefoy still looks an interesting prospect.
#155
Posted 10 August 2004 - 01:47 AM
Hmm, I don't know about all of those said details about this person being busy then, etc.. Those can be worked around.Good. Bring on Owen.Mr Jackman seems to have his schedulle full for the next couple of years...
![]()
#156
Posted 13 August 2004 - 12:16 AM
and I have to say I,m not keen on either as Bond
( I like them both in the roles they have had so far, I just dont see either of them as Bond!)
Then it would have to be Jackman on the basis of screen charisma and acting ability.
Owen looks the part, more than jackman, but his performance in Arthur was by far the dullest, most out of place looking shambles I have seen in a long time.
Either he does not have the hidden depths he has hinted at in other screen roles or he was very, very badly directed.......time will tell.
In the mean time Jackman has never been stretched in a screen role
(and as Connery pointed out... Bond is a much more complex role than people imagine )
nor IMHO does he look the part.
(He's short, and looks like a refined Bruce Springsteen.....now that's still a good looking guy...... But it's NOT how I see Bond!!!!
However!
He HAS survived some major league special FX orientated movies and come through with an intense character driven performance....
SO ! Jackman over Owen, on present form...
#157
Posted 13 August 2004 - 07:15 AM
Just picking you up on a small point. If you're referring to Jackman, then he's not short. He's around 6'2" and this is fairly obvious if you see him in any off-screen photos with other people.(He's short, and looks like a refined Bruce Springsteen.....now that's still a good looking guy...... But it's NOT how I see Bond!!!!
#158
Posted 13 August 2004 - 11:40 AM
I don't like the guy Clive Owens, his face
![:)](https://debrief.commanderbond.net/public/style_emoticons/default/dizzy.gif)
#159
Posted 13 August 2004 - 04:20 PM
#160
Posted 13 August 2004 - 04:25 PM
Sounds average. I think Moore might have been the tallest with 6'3, so it isn't short by any means.Just picking you up on a small point. If you're referring to Jackman, then he's not short. He's around 6'2" and this is fairly obvious if you see him in any off-screen photos with other people.(He's short, and looks like a refined Bruce Springsteen.....now that's still a good looking guy...... But it's NOT how I see Bond!!!!
#161
Posted 13 August 2004 - 11:50 PM
Might've been an article on Mel Gibson as Bond, actually.
#163
Posted 14 August 2004 - 05:32 AM
![:)](https://debrief.commanderbond.net/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
#164
Posted 14 August 2004 - 05:53 AM
Coincidence or not, yay!So Hugh Jackman is as tall as Lazenby eh? Hmmm, two aussies who are the same height. Yeah, I think it means Jackman will be the next Bond
![:)](https://debrief.commanderbond.net/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
#165
Posted 14 August 2004 - 10:22 AM
Did you know that a real James Bond, one employed by Her Majesty's government would actually be more suitable if he were shorter than six foot? Yes, well, according to this anyway:
James Bond, Britain
#166
Posted 14 August 2004 - 03:23 PM