Maybe if you stayed awake you'd find it a better film.And OHMSS is a boring movie.I always fell a sleep there.
Goldeneye BEST BOND FILM
#31
Posted 17 March 2004 - 09:11 PM
#32
Posted 17 March 2004 - 11:27 PM
#33
Posted 17 March 2004 - 11:33 PM
#34
Posted 18 March 2004 - 01:05 AM
#35
Posted 18 March 2004 - 09:54 PM
It's got everything you could want...
Two beautiful bond girls
Computer Hacking
A tank chase
Great Q Scene
Russians as the vilans
Spy satalites
Aston Martin DB5
Its just BRILLIANT
IMHO
#36
Posted 18 March 2004 - 10:06 PM
I saw it at the American world premiere at Radio City two weeks or so before it opened nationwide and it was one of the best movie going experiences of my life.
#37
Posted 18 March 2004 - 10:33 PM
I totally agree. I love this film, but the strange, overt synth score ruins it. It's crying out for a big orchestra and something stylish. David Arnold was a revelation for the music when he took over.I think it's a great film with only the score keeping it from being the best.
#38
Posted 20 March 2004 - 06:42 PM
#39
Posted 20 March 2004 - 06:50 PM
#40
Posted 20 March 2004 - 07:31 PM
I think the music in the pretitles was alright but it might have been a better idea to use more "Bond-like" music when we get to the present day.There are certain bits of the score that I do like, such as the totally odd track played when Bond and Xenia engage in road rage during the beginning of the film and the music that ocurs in the finale, but other parts of it leave a bit more to be desired.
#41
Posted 20 March 2004 - 08:06 PM
#42
Posted 20 March 2004 - 09:05 PM
Yes, I have to admit that the 'Goldeneye Overture' is indeed a catchy tune.I think the music in the pretitles was alright but it might have been a better idea to use more "Bond-like" music when we get to the present day.There are certain bits of the score that I do like, such as the totally odd track played when Bond and Xenia engage in road rage during the beginning of the film and the music that ocurs in the finale, but other parts of it leave a bit more to be desired.
#43
Posted 20 March 2004 - 10:24 PM
#44
Posted 20 March 2004 - 10:27 PM
It's a decent score, but perhaps not familiar enough to us.
#45
Posted 21 March 2004 - 03:38 AM
I would disagree with the assertion that GoldenEye is the best Bond film, but it was certainly welcome after the six year gap between it and License to Kill.
#46
Posted 21 March 2004 - 03:49 AM
GE was rather back to basics though, and worth the long wait. Brosnan had such a great fight in this one w/ Sean Bean, though none that good since. Martin Campbell did a good job.
For some reason, I think Brosnan saying,"Moneypenny I'm devastated" and "Q, I'm familiar with that device" made me feel like 007 had indeed returned. Maybe it was that gray suit...thou shalt not covet thy neighbors suit
Edited by Onyx2626, 21 March 2004 - 04:02 AM.
#47
Posted 21 March 2004 - 03:56 AM
#48
Posted 22 March 2004 - 03:38 AM
#49
Posted 22 March 2004 - 03:44 AM
#50
Posted 23 March 2004 - 07:17 PM
#51
Posted 13 April 2004 - 05:43 PM
Goldeneye is OK, at best. It's certainly the best of Brosnan's Bonds, for whatever that's worth. It still bears the mark of the the late Albert Broccoli, which in and of itself ensures quality. Ilike a lot of Bruce Feirstein's dialogue and the presentation of Bond as a walking anachronism in a new world. To that extent, I think Goldeneye should have been the LAST Bond film, not the hearkening of a new era.
#52
Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:00 PM
Goldeneye has a lot going for it too, the score is great, but Brosnan seems unsure of himself in a few scenes, and that kind of takes the film down a notch or two.
As for my favorite Brosnan film, anyone who knows me knows that I love DAD
#53
Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:30 PM
But it's not the best Bond ever, though.
That goes to From Russia with Love
Edited by SPECTRE_ASSASSIN, 13 April 2004 - 07:31 PM.

