
The ending of Thunderball
#1
Posted 31 January 2004 - 04:59 AM
#2
Posted 31 January 2004 - 05:37 AM
You'll either totaly get that, or not.
#3
Posted 31 January 2004 - 11:44 AM
Not sure if I totally get that - but I was LMAO at that!!!They both get scraped down the runway at 50 MPH and whilst Bond was able to peeled off the tarmack for YOLT, sadly Domino was turned into a pizza.
You'll either totaly get that, or not.

#4
Posted 31 January 2004 - 01:53 PM

#5
Posted 31 January 2004 - 02:58 PM

By the way, I totally got that.

#6
Posted 03 February 2004 - 05:51 PM
Also, Professor Kutze jumps off of the Disco Volante with Bond and Domino. Nothing is shown as to what happened to him, plus Bond and Domino don't appear concerned. Maybe a shot of him crawling up on shore, or something, could have been added.The ending of the movie, where Bond and Domino are suddenly pulled behind the airplane is whimsical and amusing. A helicopter could set them down smoothly somewhere, but the plane certainly couldn't. I'm sure there's a simple answer. Just wondering.
#7
Posted 03 February 2004 - 08:21 PM
I felt his character could've used much more interaction in the film. There is very little information given about him, yet you do know the basics. His character seems to just be an addition to the film, even though, I'm pretty sure I recall him from the novel of the same name.Also, Professor Kutze jumps off of the Disco Volante with Bond and Domino. Nothing is shown as to what happened to him, plus Bond and Domino don't appear concerned. Maybe a shot of him crawling up on shore, or something, could have been added.
#8
Posted 05 September 2004 - 07:18 AM
Well I do think Domino and Bond was pulled inside the plane.The ending of the movie, where Bond and Domino are suddenly pulled behind the airplane is whimsical and amusing. But, unless I'm missing something, how are they planning on getting down, or up? They aren't hanging on a tow line from a helicopter. They're being dragged very abruptly behind a fast moving airplane. And the rope isn't connected to a part of the plane where they can be pulled in (as far as I can tell). I don't believe they have parachutes either. A helicopter could set them down smoothly somewhere, but the plane certainly couldn't. I'm sure there's a simple answer. Just wondering.
The device used is a Fulton Skyhook. It was developed by Interountain Aviation to pickup shot down pilots. The plane is a B-17 flying fortress. More information can be found at my webpage
BMT 216A: James Bond Vehicle Library

#9
Posted 05 September 2004 - 12:17 PM
But it doesn't explain just how they were winched inside. After the efficiency of being wisked up in a flash, I can't see operatives throwing hooks out of the window trying to lassoo them in before they run out of fuel.
Would sort of diminish the whole thing if they had to then drop them back in the soup after having picked them up.
But even that would present a problem - unless the hook at the front is also a scissor affair.
I don't know.
#10
Posted 05 September 2004 - 12:19 PM
Classic.They both get scraped down the runway at 50 MPH and whilst Bond was able to peeled off the tarmack for YOLT, sadly Domino was turned into a pizza.
#11
Posted 05 September 2004 - 12:51 PM
ThanksNice site.
But it doesn't explain just how they were winched inside. After the efficiency of being wisked up in a flash, I can't see operatives throwing hooks out of the window trying to lassoo them in before they run out of fuel.
Would sort of diminish the whole thing if they had to then drop them back in the soup after having picked them up.
But even that would present a problem - unless the hook at the front is also a scissor affair.
I don't know.

The Skyhook system was used by CIA to retreive agents - and I am not kidding !
Take a look at Operation Coldfeet at CIA's website.
#12
Posted 05 September 2004 - 01:13 PM
Well, well.The Skyhook system was used by CIA to retreive agents - and I am not kidding !
Take a look at Operation Coldfeet at CIA's website.
Very many thanks for that sir. Didn't realise they could release the balloon or that the hook actually attached the cable physically to the plane.
Ingenious.
#13
Posted 05 September 2004 - 03:51 PM
#14
Posted 05 September 2004 - 04:34 PM
Thank you very much.Very cool site there BMT216a!

#15
Posted 05 September 2004 - 04:35 PM
#16
Posted 05 September 2004 - 04:55 PM
Help me.
#17
Posted 05 September 2004 - 05:08 PM
Sorry, didn't mean to spoil the funAhh, i'm still laughing at my own Domino joke.
Help me.

anyway: I do like the joke

#18
Posted 05 September 2004 - 05:15 PM
#19
Posted 06 September 2004 - 02:05 AM
Geez, imagine the G-force and whiplash of suddenly getting yanked out of the water (wherever) by a plane. One's chest cavity contents would end up in one's feet.Well, well.The Skyhook system was used by CIA to retreive agents - and I am not kidding !
Take a look at Operation Coldfeet at CIA's website.
Very many thanks for that sir. Didn't realise they could release the balloon or that the hook actually attached the cable physically to the plane.
Ingenious.

#20
Posted 06 September 2004 - 09:02 AM
Hard to believe but...
#21
Posted 06 September 2004 - 04:51 PM
... and the Coldfeet agents are smiling - even after the climb - or is it the medicine ?Actually, have a look at the CIA link. It says the yanking is gradual because of the combined climb up and forwards.
Hard to believe but...

#22
Posted 07 September 2004 - 01:24 AM
#23
Posted 07 September 2004 - 01:44 AM
Buck
#24
Posted 07 September 2004 - 02:00 AM
....I don't think I want to try it all the same.Actually, have a look at the CIA link. It says the yanking is gradual because of the combined climb up and forwards.
Hard to believe but...

#25
Posted 07 September 2004 - 02:02 AM
I think that was the way the editting may have shown the seen. A bit fast, yes.I have my own problems with the Thunderball ending. Those boats were moving exceptionally fast during the end sequence. It looked like the Disco Volante was hopping over reefs and small islands at 90 mph.
#26
Posted 07 September 2004 - 08:36 AM
It wasn't the editing so much as the under cranking of the camera.I think that was the way the editting may have shown the seen. A bit fast, yes.
#27
Posted 07 September 2004 - 01:32 PM
Ah, that would make sense.It wasn't the editing so much as the under cranking of the camera.I think that was the way the editting may have shown the seen. A bit fast, yes.
#28
Posted 07 September 2004 - 02:06 PM
...Which is precisely why I love it so much. So many people complain about TB's slow pace, yet when things get sped up, the detractors still complain! You have to keep in mind that the filmmakers threw everything but the kitchen sink into the movie to "out-James Bond" the competition. Sure, the film fails on some levels (ostensibly speaking; I love everything about it) such as pacing and length, but that's what one gets with an epic.I have my own problems with the Thunderball ending. Those boats were moving exceptionally fast during the end sequence. It looked like the Disco Volante was hopping over reefs and small islands at 90 mph.
#29
Posted 07 September 2004 - 02:09 PM
Interesting!ThanksNice site.
But it doesn't explain just how they were winched inside. After the efficiency of being wisked up in a flash, I can't see operatives throwing hooks out of the window trying to lassoo them in before they run out of fuel.
Would sort of diminish the whole thing if they had to then drop them back in the soup after having picked them up.
But even that would present a problem - unless the hook at the front is also a scissor affair.
I don't know.![]()
The Skyhook system was used by CIA to retreive agents - and I am not kidding !
Take a look at Operation Coldfeet at CIA's website.
#30
Posted 07 September 2004 - 06:06 PM

Look for the B-17 in the bombers section of Aircraft & Artifacts.