Chris Lee is almost always singled out as one of the best villains. I happen to agree.
Guy Hamilton's last Bond film. Thank God he didn't direct another.
John Barry proved he can still put out a score in just 2 weeks, and it isn't half bad.
The bad....
Roger Moore proves again that he was miscast as James Bond. He is a total buffoon here. Lee's villain is so good, you end up almost rooting for him against this putz they got playing oo7. Connery's presence was just being screamed out for in this movie. It would have been more of an even match. Connery's age would have given some tension to the story, which was there in the book...yes, the book they forgot to adapt. In the book you had an aging, not at the top of his game Bond who was sent up against this top of the line marksman. Who will win? 1974 Connery would have nailed this perfectly, especially if he had a real director like Terence Young there to guide things along.
Roger was never convincing as the physical Bond. I just wish they could have gotten someone who looked like they could handle themselves in a fight. Lazenby had that in spades. Moore didn't. Watching the documentary on the Live and Let Die DVD, you see how scrawny Moore is. The guy is a pipsqueak in the fight scenes. They look so obviously choreographed that you laugh at the absurdity of it all. Look at how he handles the goons in the alley in New York City in Live and Let Die. Those guys are falling on the ground before Moore does his stupid fight moves that he does.
And finally, how in the hell can some of you guys go ga-ga over characters like Jaws and Sheriff JW Pepper and then comment on how bad Brosnan's movies are? Hell, even Wade has more believability than these two idiots. Every time I read about how some of you think Moore's movies are Flemingesque, I have to just shake my head. I guess if you look hard enough, you can see a little Fleming in the works of all 7 or 8 Police Academy movies, too....if you look hard enough, I suppose.
