Originally posted by Trempo
The London Daily Express reported that Broccoli was looking at Ted Kotcheff and John Landis as possible directors for the film. Kotcheff directed Rambo:First Blood and John Landis had filmed, among many projects, Animal House and the ill-fated 1982 Twilight Zone: The Movie, which resulted in the death of actor Vic Morrow and two children.
Kotcheff (director of FIRST BLOOD; there is no such film as RAMBO: FIRST BLOOD) would have been a great choice at the time. He really fitted Eon's profile for directors down to a T: http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0467646/. I remember Landis being rumoured for directing duties on THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH, too (and I believe he did some uncredited writing work on THE SPY WHO LOVED ME).
As for this treatment, well, it doesn't seem all that bad to me; in fact, from the point of view of great locations and exciting action scenes it seems pretty good. There is no mention of Whoopi Goldberg (I highly doubt that the role of Connie Webb would have gone to her; as ray t points out in another thread, Goldberg just wasn't Bond girl material), and so what if Willard Huyck and Gloria Katz (not William and Gloria Huyck, actually) wrote HOWARD THE DUCK? They also wrote AMERICAN GRAFFITI and INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM; and, anyway, their involvement in this third Dalton Bond project was only considered. Heck, Roger Spottiswoode was the director of STOP! OR MY MOM WILL SHOT, and he was actually hired (and did a good job, IMO), so let's squash all this prejudice, shall we?
Originally posted by Trempo
Early indications were that "the plot involved terrorists who want to stage a nuclear meltdown and industrialists who want to keep Hong Kong a capitalist stronghold" ... The main point to Wilson and Ruggiero`s treatment for Bond 17 is that Sir Henry wants Britain to withdraw from Hong Kong; his high tech empire has manufactured critical components for all navigation, communication, weapon and missile guidance systems in the world. With his expertise in electronics, Sir Henry plots to unleash a computer virus that can paralyze every military and commercial unit in the world. This power will be directed against Britain if his demands are not met.
Hang on. He wants to keep Hong Kong a capitalist stronghold, but he wants Britain to withdraw from Hong Kong? And why go to elaborate means to compel Britain to do something it had committed itself to doing anyway, only a few years down the line?