Jump to content


This is a read only archive of the old forums
The new CBn forums are located at https://quarterdeck.commanderbond.net/

 
Photo

Trigger Mortis

September 2015

142 replies to this topic

Poll: Trigger Mortis - the new Bond novel

This is a public poll. Other members will be able to see which options you chose

The title

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

When it's released...

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

Insofar as these "one-shot noted author" Bonds, since 2008, have gone...

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.

This inclusion of Fleming material and Pussy Galore...

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#121 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 15 September 2015 - 08:01 AM

I think Trigger Mortis could be filmed, but I wonder if it could be anything other than a period piece? Key to the plot is the start of the US/Soviet space race, which of course no longer exists as such - indeed the US is reliant on Russia at the moment to get its astronauts to the International Space Station.

Perhaps in a present day film of TM, since our villain is Korean it could be a North Korean driven plot to sabotage the US and its space programme? Of course it would also involve North Korean suddenly deciding it was entering cars in Formula 1 races also - unlikely, but with the boy Kim in charge, you never know! ;-)

#122 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 15 September 2015 - 09:19 PM

Bond entering the German Grand Prix in 1957 is hard enough to swallow, but in 2016...! :)

 

The refugee stuff is more relevant than they probably realised when the book was being written, but the rest is pretty heavily based in the period. It's tricky.



#123 coco1997

coco1997

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2821 posts
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 16 September 2015 - 12:02 AM

Anyone done a circa 1966 fancast for a Connery TRIGGER MORTIS film set between GF and TB?



#124 Guy Haines

Guy Haines

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3075 posts
  • Location:"Special envoy" no more. As of 7/5/15 elected to office somewhere in Nottinghamshire, England.

Posted 16 September 2015 - 07:00 AM

Bond entering the German Grand Prix in 1957 is hard enough to swallow, but in 2016...! :)
 
The refugee stuff is more relevant than they probably realised when the book was being written, but the rest is pretty heavily based in the period. It's tricky.


Agreed, filming TM in our day and age would be awkward, and I think whoever took on the task of screenwriter would wind up having to make some major changes - but it's not exactly the first time that's happened when even Fleming's novels have transferred to the big screen.

Bond in a Grand Prix race? Not quite that far fetched for me - we've already seen him use fast cars, and fast vehicles of other types on numerous occasions over the decades. And he's not the only one - there have been two episodes of The Saint in which Simon Templar entered motor races to foil a villain's sabotage plot against a driver or car winning a race.

Incidentally, Bond entering in the 1950s would have been more of a risk than today - according to a "Motor Sport" special I've been reading recently about legendary Grand Prix drivers, there was quite an attrition rate of drivers killed or injured then compared with now.

#125 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 16 September 2015 - 07:21 AM

Incidentally, Bond entering in the 1950s would have been more of a risk than today - according to a "Motor Sport" special I've been reading recently about legendary Grand Prix drivers, there was quite an attrition rate of drivers killed or injured then compared with now.



Till '94 an average of two drivers were killed each season. In some years four, in a few none. But death was quite a regular occurrence in Formula 1/Grand Prix racing. Makes one wonder...

#126 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 26 September 2015 - 01:54 AM

I wonder how this is selling.

#127 marktmurphy

marktmurphy

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:London

Posted 26 September 2015 - 08:36 AM

Anyone done a circa 1966 fancast for a Connery TRIGGER MORTIS film set between GF and TB?

 

 

It's the only Bond book I've read where I've pictured Connery in it all the way through.



#128 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 26 September 2015 - 09:17 AM

I wonder how this is selling.


Somehow my impression is not too well. It was launched, saw some discount from day one, the usual suspects reviewing it - and now it's already old hat. In two or three years the next one is likely to see a similar fate.

#129 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 26 September 2015 - 01:58 PM

Agreed. It's a good book, but it kind of came and went without much fanfare. Horowitz's comments about Elba received more attention.

#130 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 26 September 2015 - 02:18 PM

That's unfortunate. It's the best of the bunch, but the numerous recent attempts to manufacture a Bond novel "event" undoubtedly exhausted public interest.

#131 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 26 September 2015 - 02:23 PM

It seems to sell best in Great Britain - on amazon it´s on No. 4 for spy fiction, No. 74 in contemporary fiction.

 

Other countries... well, not so well.  I could imagine that SPECTRE will lift the sales and increase interest for the holiday buying season.



#132 Harmsway

Harmsway

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 13293 posts

Posted 26 September 2015 - 02:27 PM

I could imagine that SPECTRE will lift the sales and increase interest for the holiday buying season.


Let's hope so.

#133 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 26 September 2015 - 03:43 PM

Just was at a local bookstore - Hugendubel, large chain here in Germany - and asked the woman in charge of decorating their tables and wall shelves, their most important places to sell. She didn't have anything like a definite overview but according to her it's a pretty bad seller and will soon lose its prominent place on the thriller table.

While she was still relatively young she remembers Horowitz selling far better in the children's/young adult corner with his Alex Rider books. Even his Sherlock Holmes - still a relative oddity in the mainstream market - sold better than this.

I think sharpshooter is spot-on here, his remarks about Elba garnered him more interest than his book. And a good deal of the people discussing whether Elba is supposedly 'too street' didn't even know who Horowitz is, nor did they care for his book.

Note also that in Germany books aren't just sold on discount. If Trigger Mortis doesn't pick up speed soon - and right at the moment it doesn't look too likely - it will disappear from shelves before SPECTRE even premieres. That in turn means the books go back to the publisher. Now, if IFP announce another Bond novel, by Horowitz or by whoever else will want the gig, in two years from now, then publishers will look at their figures and be astonished to note they still have half the print run from the last one in storage. From a year where a Bond film came out.

Conclusion: don't buy; or only at a bargain price.

#134 Double-Oh Agent

Double-Oh Agent

    Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4325 posts

Posted 27 September 2015 - 02:55 AM

That's too bad. Trigger Mortis is a good, solid, entertaining read.

 

I suppose not having a successful Bond novel three times in the last seven years has dwindled interest, particularly with different authors every time. It makes it hard to have any consistency or confidence in the product for the general public when that happens. Fool them once, twice, three times they're not going to go for it a fourth time at least until you prove you can deliver.

 

I hope that IFP give Anthony Horowitz another crack at it because he has a good grasp of the Bond character/novel and he is the best of the recent continuation authors (although that is not saying a whole lot. Sebastian Faulks didn't take it seriously and undermined his product, Jeffery Deaver lacked a little something in his updating of the character while giving Bond the overly used current trend of dramatizing the hero's backstory by making the death of his parents suspicious/mysterious, and William Boyd delivered a slow, boring adventure.)

 

Hopefully, Horowitz's next crack comes sooner rather than later. More continuity (and good continuity at that) is what is needed now and Horowitz is off to a good start in showing he can deliver it.



#135 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 27 September 2015 - 06:02 AM

I suppose not having a successful Bond novel three times in the last seven years has dwindled interest, particularly with different authors every time. It makes it hard to have any consistency or confidence in the product for the general public when that happens. Fool them once, twice, three times they're not going to go for it a fourth time at least until you prove you can deliver.

 

I think that's it. The public are fatigued. I think DMC was a success in terms of interest and sales, but it all dwindled with the subsequent books.  



#136 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 27 September 2015 - 10:15 AM

The timing of the release maybe was wrong.  The whole Bond publicity machine is just getting started.  To have the novel come out after SPECTRE would have probably helped.



#137 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 27 September 2015 - 11:48 AM

Probably. Also the promo campaign could have used a little cross-reference from the film. But evidently the lit-Bond branch is now a fairly limited sideline of the The Bond Corporation ™ and merely used every so often to keep it secure in the realm of the brand. It's just a fact that 99 per cent of people on the street associate Bond with the films and nothing else.

Meanwhile the reading public is strongly interested in thrillers, but not necessarily in Bond. If you look at the market you can clearly see author's series are going strong, nearly every paperback now features the author's name in bold letters while the title is several dots smaller. Also mirrors the fact that most authors now have more than one character going; or even don't use a series character.

Bond in this market is more an extension of the classic pulp character, sadly minus any freshness or constant quality. Let's face it, for the most part the books now sail on the back of the films. But the books are not the films and many lack their own specific redeeming qualities that kept the originals going.

#138 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 27 September 2015 - 12:19 PM

I´m looking forward to reading "Trigger Mortis" - but I do wonder if it were helpful to tie in future novels with the films in a way that they could imagine missions between the movies, referencing the era of the particular actor.

 

Could help drumming up business - and since the films only come every three years novels could benefit from that.



#139 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 27 September 2015 - 01:25 PM

The thing is, EON is not into books, they are pretty busy getting a film off the ground every once in a while and that alone costs them most of their energy. IFP...well, if we take a closer look they are not into books either; they are solely into the Fleming canon and branched out with diminishing results. EON has no interest in watering down their product, IFP has not the scope, funds and manpower to really turn the wheel around. Perhaps they even got their hands tied from getting their Bond closer to EON's. So they are stuck with efforts that only go so far. They've got themselves a niche but they can hardly expand from there. And there's another not-so-different example even, the Bourne books seem to follow a similar pattern of being mainly written for the ever smaller number of fans of Ludlum's original. None of them are big sellers or will ever get much recognition beyond their target audience. And few of them will be fans coming from the films.

#140 SecretAgentFan

SecretAgentFan

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9055 posts
  • Location:Germany

Posted 27 September 2015 - 02:29 PM

Bummer.  

 

Do you think that setting the novels within the Craig era might even be prohibited by EON?



#141 Dustin

Dustin

    Commander

  • Commanding Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5786 posts

Posted 27 September 2015 - 03:20 PM

It's interesting that the Project X thingy went over board without any much fanfare. When Deaver was announced and details about 'rebooting' leaked everything looked like there would be some kind of effort to turn lit-Bond into its own 'modern' brand. I can imagine that caused some raised eyebrows over at Eon-House.

There is the question of copyright that's playing into all this, a topic that's extremely sensitive and that now led to Bond having become a registered trademark to secure the character firmly in Eon's sphere of influence. Even IFP now uses Bond 'with permission'.

Had IFP followed through on the reboot they would effectively have created their own golem of their property. What influence would this have had on copyright? Can Deaver's Bond seriously be considered as Fleming's? When he's evidently a wholly different person?

Tricky field, very tricky. You can easily spend the net-earnings of all books since Faulks' on lawyers and expert assessments concerning this matter. A can of worms they probably closed just in time with housing all rights with Eon and giving IFP only permission of use. On what conditions though...

#142 glidrose

glidrose

    Lt. Commander

  • Veterans
  • PipPipPip
  • 2469 posts

Posted 29 September 2015 - 07:44 PM

Sales thread up - and the news ain't pretty. In short it's selling better than Solo, but much worse than DMC and CB.

http://debrief.comma...-sales-figures/

#143 sharpshooter

sharpshooter

    Commander

  • Executive Officers
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8996 posts

Posted 09 November 2015 - 12:37 PM

The timing of the release maybe was wrong. The whole Bond publicity machine is just getting started. To have the novel come out after SPECTRE would have probably helped.


I was thinking this recently. For me, Trigger Mortis was an ace up their sleeve, and it's a shame it generally came and went. I still think sales would've been on the lower side of the scale (not because it's a poor book), but a closer proximity to SPECTRE's hype train would've had to have had some positive effect.